Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -104. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,630–9,769 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 17:57
9,646
-32
14 Sept 2026, 10:41
9,678
-2
10 Sept 2026, 12:00
9,680
+3
4 Sept 2026, 21:37
9,677
-8
1 Sept 2026, 00:25
9,685
-10
29 Aug 2026, 08:42
9,695
+2
26 Aug 2026, 10:14
9,693
-27
23 Aug 2026, 17:39
9,720
-1
20 Aug 2026, 06:52
9,721
+6
17 Aug 2026, 11:57
9,715
-11
14 Aug 2026, 10:17
9,726
-15
10 Aug 2026, 19:35
9,741
-12
7 Aug 2026, 12:36
9,753
+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:45
9,750
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:39
9,750
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 22 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,724 reactions across 18 posts, in 28 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,410
27.6%
custom 5294425654865973466
1,857
21.3%
custom 5296765402724978890
1,390
15.9%
❤🔥
883
10.1%
custom 5242526322328097870
643
7.37%
💘
523
5.99%
🔥
426
4.88%
custom 5467638937134578178
159
1.82%
👾
99
1.13%
👻
49
0.562%
👍
41
0.47%
😁
38
0.436%
🎉
31
0.355%
⚡
23
0.264%
🤯
22
0.252%
💯
20
0.229%
👌
18
0.206%
🆒
15
0.172%
🌚
15
0.172%
🏆
14
0.16%
8 further kinds
48
0.55%
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,724 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
300
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 18 we hold a reading for · 83%
Most on one post
158
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @satanismrus. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 February 2026 to 23 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Намерено слабые люди имеют право, по вашему мнению, на пользование благами сильных, если они не принимают уроков жизни?
Категорически нет!23%
Нет, но есть исключения.49%
Да, но не все.26%
Да каждый.11%
Ваш ответ в комментариях.3%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Более трёхсот комментариев людей, которые оправдывают собственную ничтожность и боятся завтра оказаться в подобном положении.
Мои знакомые с медицинским образованием разделились на два лагеря.
Первые не против таких пациентов, так как могут без опасений практиковаться.
Вторые говорят, что иногда им приходится в порядке живой очереди сначала помогать человеку с десятым визитом в больницу с одной и той же проблемой,…
Я не помогаю верующим
Не потому, что они верят в Бога, а потому, что слишком часто благодарят не того, кто реально им помог.
Ты тратишь своё время, силы, деньги, связи. Рискуешь, поддерживаешь, вытаскиваешь человека из сложной ситуации. А потом слышишь: «Спасибо Господу, Он услышал мои молитвы».
Получается, ты — не личность, не субъект, а всего лишь инструмент, через который якобы сработала чья-то высшая воля. Да, …
Обожаю запах «мирного» напалма в комментариях моего Threads. Обычный пост:
«Лучше дочь в сауне, чем покрытая в хиджаб. …»,— как сразу боты были уличены под этим постом.
Ссылка: нажми.
Самая омерзительная часть, так называемого, христианства — Русская Православная Церковь. Жертвоприношения, каторги, пропаганда войны, сокращение людских прав и ограничение свобод, это по истине самая большая пропагандистская машина современной России. Они начинают потреблять мозги своей паствы ещё до начала того, как ребенок научится говорить.
Любая догма существует лишь до тех пор, пока её не подвергли сомнению. Лю…
С днём меня рождения!
Wish-list:
Будьте здоровы, счастливы, и незамедлительно двигайтесь к своим целям!
Это мои пожелания вам.
— Осквернитель
@DrkSpectre
Сатанизм НЕ поддерживает ЛГБТ-сообщество, поскольку оно давно стало политически и финансово ориентированным. Сатанизм поддерживает разнообразие сексуальных предпочтений и выступает за снятие табу с этого вопроса.
Свобода сатаниста заканчивается там, где начинается свобода другого человека. Сатанизм против насилия и дешёвого разврата.
— Осквернитель
Орган в церкви,— единственный инструмент, который я готов уважать. Не из-за веры, но силы его звучания. Звучание органа заставляют оставить уют, иллюзию «доброго бога». Сладкую мораль стада.
Остается что-то древнее, тяжелое, созидательное. Физические ощущения сотрясения воздуха восхищают меня. Реальность становится плотнее.
Веками вбиваемая покорность аннигилируется впечатлением титанической трагедии в мелодии орга…
С наступающим праздником, дорогие Сатанисты и гости нашего канала!
Желаю вам прекрасного вечера, шикарной ночи! Делитесь чем занимаетесь, находите новые знакомства и будьте счастливы!
Весь в делах, но свободную минутку на поздравление нашел. Рад всех видеть, слышать, всех благ.
Mainz, Deutschland
— Осквернитель
Объявляю запуск нашего Threads!
Ссылка!
Теперь у нас появилась возможность прямо, и без юмора заявить о себе! Подпишись, и прояви активность, дабы о нас узнал каждый!
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @satanismrus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Намерено слабые люди имеют право, по вашему мнению, на пользование благами сильных, если они не принимают уроков жизни?
Категорически нет!23%
Нет, но есть исключения.49%
Да, но не все.26%
Да каждый.11%
Ваш ответ в комментариях.3%
The shares total 112%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2026 to 23 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сатанизм Ла-Вея” (@satanismrus), 9,646 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satanismrus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.