Фоткам полтора года, больше сказать нечего🤪 Возможно покидаю в комментарии смешные бэки
custom 52223183122218515298

Channel
@sateazo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
290subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001628668884 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sateazo |
| Created | 22 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sateazo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 290 | -2 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 292 | -1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 293 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:24 | 296 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:36 | 298 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 294 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:15 | 293 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 293 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
271 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5222318312221851529 | 73 | 26.9% | |
| custom 5316785654040909339 | 65 | 24.0% | |
| custom 5219990229494023274 | 49 | 18.1% | |
| custom 5440588245261906624 | 32 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5298804721916603905 | 20 | 7.38% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.369% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.369% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Фоткам полтора года, больше сказать нечего🤪 Возможно покидаю в комментарии смешные бэки
custom 52223183122218515298
Nana Osaki : @muhasyslya Photo by @FotoKrisO #cosplay
custom 531678565404090933910custom 52223183122218515295custom 52199902294940232744custom 52988047219166039053
У меня лежат ещё несколько фотосов и фотки с фестивалей, так что постараюсь больше надолго не пропадать 😔
custom 544058824526190662410custom 53167856540409093397🍓1
Devil May Cry Lady Photo by @FotoKrisO #cosplay 🌧️🌨️🌨️🌧️📌📌🌧️🌨️🌨️🌧️ Леди всё( заливаю последние, не самые вау, фоточки. Но фотос вышел очень вкусным, надеюсь и вам зашло☺️
custom 544058824526190662412custom 522231831222185152910custom 53167856540409093399custom 52199902294940232742
обновила инфо спустя 2 года позорница😋
custom 531678565404090933911custom 52199902294940232743custom 54405882452619066243
⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ Я Ксюша, более известна как Сато́зо, косплеер из Екатеринбурга 🤩 ✨⚫️⚫️ #cosplay - все мои образы #showtime - все выступления #experience - впечатления от мероприятий, фотосессий и тп все посты можно найти в закрепах ⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️⚫️ ⚫️Другие соцсетки щитпост канал🌟 https://t.me/+UxSUiFbK…
custom 522231831222185152918custom 521999022949402327410custom 52988047219166039058custom 54405882452619066243💅1custom 53167856540409093391
Скоро будет один большой постик с оставшимися фоточками и Помни ВСЁ.🤡 🔴Pomni 🔵The Amazing Digital Circus Photo by @FotoKrisO #cosplay
custom 531678565404090933921custom 52223183122218515295custom 54405882452619066244
Была вчера на пати в огромной шляпи🤩 больше сказать нечего
❤🔥17custom 52988047219166039053custom 53167856540409093392
Пофоткали ронпу сварились на солнце 🤩 Хината @troutfish0808
custom 521999022949402327424❤🔥12custom 52223183122218515295custom 53167856540409093394
Чайная Сатозо ᯓᡣ𐭩 pinned a photo
Крольность🤩
custom 522231831222185152922custom 52199902294940232746custom 52988047219166039056❤🔥1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sateazo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sateazo named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чайная Сатозо ᯓᡣ𐭩” (@sateazo), 290 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sateazo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.