Channel
@sayehomid
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
548subscribers
+20 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001177330803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sayehomid |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sayehomid |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 548 | +7 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 14:22 | 541 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 541 | +2 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:56 | 539 | +3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:09 | 536 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:49 | 535 | +8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:51 | 527 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:31 | 528 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,000 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 83.3% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚫 خودت رو با بقیه مقایسه نکن! یکی بیشتر خونده… یکی آزمون بهتری داده… یکی زودتر شروع کرده… یکی کلاس بیشتری رفته… اما مگه شرایط همه یکیه؟ قطعاً نه! تو فقط باید با نسخه دیروز خودت مقایسه بشی.🌱 اگه امروز بهتر از دیروز خوندی، کمتر اشتباه کردی یا یه قدم جلوتر رفتی، یعنی داری پیشرفت میکنی.💪 🏆 موفقیت، مسابقه با دیگران نیست؛ مسابقه با خودِ دیروزته. پس به جای اینکه ببینی بقیه کجان، ببین خودت چقدر جلو رفتی.❤️ @sayehomid
درس خوندنِ واقعی یعنی چی؟ اینکه ۳ ساعت کتاب جلوت باز باشه، الزاماً یعنی ۳ ساعت مطالعه نکردی! مطالعهی مفید یعنی: ✅ فهمیدن ✅ یادآوری کردن ✅ تست زدن ✅ بررسی اشتباهات ✅ مرور کردن پس بهجای اینکه فقط بپرسی: «چند ساعت خوندم؟» گاهی از خودت بپرس: «از چیزی که خوندم، چقدرش واقعاً توی ذهنم مونده؟» 👀 @sayehomid
❤2
🔴 تغییر سهمیههای کنکور به آزمون ۱۴۰۶ نمیرسد! عسگریان دبیر ستاد علم و فناوری شورای عالی انقلاب فرهنگی: 🔹موضوع ساماندهی سهمیهها در دستور کار ستاد علم و فناوری قرار دارد و تاکنون طرحهایی نیز در این زمینه پیشنهاد شده است. 🔹احتمال اینکه این تغییرات به کنکور ۱۴۰۶ برسد، زیاد نیست؛ چراکه هرگونه تغییر در نحوه سنجش و پذیرش باید پیش از آغاز سال تحصیلی نهایی و ابلاغ شود و با توجه به روند بررسیها، بعید است تغییرات مربوط به …
🧠 ذهنت شلوغه؟ اینو امتحان کن! تا حالا شده انقدر به یه موضوع فکر کنی که آخرش نفهمی اصلاً داشتی به چی فکر میکردی؟ 😵💫 مثلاً: «اگه نتیجه اون چیزی که میخوام نشه چی؟» «فردا باید چی بخونم؟» «اصلاً از کجا شروع کنم؟» 😭 همهشون باهم = مغز هنگ کرده 🫠 ✍🏻 یه کار ساده: همهشونو بنویس. نه قشنگ، نه مرتب، نه ادبی! فقط بریز بیرون. چون وقتی یه فکر توی سرت میچرخه، تبدیل میشه به یه غول ⭐ ولی وقتی مینویسیش روی کاغذ، میبینی: «…
😵💫 زیاد درس میخونی، ولی حس میکنی هنوز بلد نیستی؟! تا حالا شده یه مبحث رو چندین بار بخونی، جزوهات رو دوباره بنویسی و تست زدن رو مدام عقب بندازی؟ 📚 شاید مشکل از کمکاری نباشه؛ شاید درگیر وسواس مطالعاتی شدی! ⚠️ وسواس مطالعاتی میتونه باعث بشه: ❌ ساعت مطالعهات بالا بره، ولی پیشرفتت کم باشه ❌ سرعت مطالعهات پایین بیاد ❌ تستزدنت عقب بیفته ❌ مدام احساس کنی «هنوز کافی نیست» ❌ استرس و کمالگرایی بیشتر بشه 🎙️ توی این…
🔡 تاریخ امتحانات نهایی شهریور اعلام شد! 🔡 با شرکت در این امتحانات تغییری در تراز امتحانات نهایی خرداد ماه حاصل نمیشود. صرفا برای افرادیست که در این درسها نمره قبولی را دریافت نکردهاند. @sayehomid
حتماً؛ متن رو روانتر، حرفهایتر و مناسب انتشار در کانال بازنویسی کردم، بدون اینکه حالت صمیمی و کنکوریش از بین بره: ⏰️ هر درس رو چه ساعتی بخونم که بیشترین بازدهی رو داشته باشم؟ 🤔 همهی ساعتهای روز برای همهی درسها یکسان نیستن! اگه زمان مطالعهات رو هوشمندانه انتخاب کنی، میتونی از انرژی و تمرکزت بهتر استفاده کنی. 👇🏻 💎 ۶ تا ۱۰ صبح | اوج تمرکز زمان طلایی مغزته! 🧠 درسهای سخت، مباحثی که دوستشون نداری و درسهای رت…
❤1
⏰زمان انتشار نتایج اولیه کنکور فرهنگیان 1405 🔔رئیس سازمان سنجش آموزش کشور گفت: ✅احتمالا نتایج اولیه آزمون سراسری سال 1405 با هدف آغاز فرایند انتخاب رشته داوطلبان، در روزهای 26 یا 27 شهریورماه اعلام خواهد شد ✅متقاضیان تا پنجم مهر فرصت دارند انتخاب رشته خود را انجام دهند!
اولین تلاشها سخته اما بعدش ..🚴🏻 ادامه بده رفیق 💛 صبحت بخیر 🌱
🎯 انتخاب رشته اصولی یعنی انتخاب متناسب با خودت! انتخابهای خوشبینانه، منطقی و مطمئن باید با توجه به شرایط هر داوطلب کنار هم قرار بگیرن تا در نهایت، یک لیست انتخاب رشته کاملاً شخصیسازیشده داشته باشیم. 😉👍 📌 انتخاب رشته یعنی: تحلیل → بررسی → سناریوسازی → چیدمان نه کپی کردن انتخاب رشته سال قبل ❌ نه استفاده از یک لیست آماده برای همه ❌ چون قرار نیست فقط بپرسیم: «کجا قبول میشی؟» 🤔 سؤال اصلی اینه: 🔥 «با شرایط تو، به…
⚠️🫤 انتخاب رشته برای همه یک نسخه ثابت نداره! قرار نیست برای همه با یه الگوی آماده انتخاب رشته کنیم. ❌ چون برای هر داوطلب باید عوامل مختلفی کنار هم بررسی بشه: 🟢 علاقه و اولویتهای شخصی 🟢 شهر و شرایط زندگی 🟢 اهداف تحصیلی و شغلی 🟢 رشتههای جایگزین 🟢 میزان ریسکپذیری در انتخابها 🟢 سناریوهای مختلف قبولی 🟢 و کلی فاکتور مهم دیگه… 💎 در نهایت، انتخاب رشته باید متناسب با شرایط خودت طراحی بشه، نه بر اساس یک نسخه تکراری برا
🎯 ترتیب انتخابها خیلی مهمتر از چیزیه که فکر میکنی! قرار نیست انتخابهات رو فقط بر اساس «شانس قبولی» پشت سر هم بچینی. ❌ انتخاب رشته اصولی یعنی ترکیبِ علاقه + شرایط شخصی + شانس قبولی ⚡️ یعنی لیستت نباید فقط این باشه: «کجاها احتمال داره قبول بشم؟» 🤔 بلکه باید تبدیل بشه به: «اگر اینجا قبول شدم، واقعاً حاضرم برم؟» ✔️ چون انتخاب رشته فقط پیدا کردنِ جایی برای قبولی نیست؛ پیدا کردن بهترین انتخاب برای آیندهته. 🎓✨
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sayehomid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“دکتر سایه میری | مشاوره تحصیلی” (@sayehomid), 548 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sayehomid.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.