Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СБГ ШОУ

Channel

СБГ ШОУ

@sbg_show

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,499subscribers

-312 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001599921494
TypeChannel
Username@sbg_show
DescriptionТелега лучшего шоу о «Зените» в обозримой истории галактики. КАНАЛ В ВК: https://vk.com/im/channels/-236616019 ЮТУБ: https://www.youtube.com/@show_sbg ГРУППА ВК: https://vk.com/sbgshow ДЗЕН: https://dzen.ru/show_sbg Для связи: @anovik12
Created24 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sbg_show

Topic

Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

10,500 average views per post against 8,499 subscribers — an engagement rate of 123.0%. Across the 16,385 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,183–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 6.90% and 25.3%, with a median of 13.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured23 of 23 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled240,430
Mature posts only127.5% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers8,499 measured 4 November 2026
Cohortb3162:rus · 16,385 channels · p10 3.55% · p25 6.90% · p50 13.6% · p75 25.3% · p90 41.1%
Position in cohort99.615th percentile · 9.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.048% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

8,4998,8118,6557 August 2026 — 8,811 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,811 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,802 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,777 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,751 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,731 subscribers21 August 2026 — 8,701 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,659 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,630 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,604 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,597 subscribers7 September 2026 — 8,569 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,618 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,592 subscribers24 September 2026 — 8,553 subscribers4 October 2026 — 8,514 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,560 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,569 subscribers17 October 2026 — 8,570 subscribers20 October 2026 — 8,563 subscribers23 October 2026 — 8,551 subscribers26 October 2026 — 8,523 subscribers29 October 2026 — 8,518 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,508 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,499 subscribers7 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 89 days, net -312. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,452–8,858 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:108,499-9
31 Oct 2026, 23:108,508-10
29 Oct 2026, 03:508,518-5
26 Oct 2026, 07:018,523-28
23 Oct 2026, 13:148,551-12
20 Oct 2026, 06:358,563-7
17 Oct 2026, 09:368,570+1
14 Oct 2026, 19:198,569+9
11 Oct 2026, 12:178,560+46
4 Oct 2026, 19:418,514-39
24 Sept 2026, 23:208,553-39
15 Sept 2026, 08:418,592-26
12 Sept 2026, 03:188,618+49
7 Sept 2026, 22:188,569-28
2 Sept 2026, 15:068,597-7
30 Aug 2026, 22:058,604-26
28 Aug 2026, 08:178,630-29
25 Aug 2026, 02:478,659-42
21 Aug 2026, 13:188,701-30
18 Aug 2026, 05:328,731first reading

Engagement

70 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
144.1%
avg views ÷ 8,499 subscribers
Avg views / post
12,200
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.981%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 70 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held70 (18 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total281,600
Reactions total2,763
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 10:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,570
Videos
≈1,010
Links
≈2,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,479 reactions across 70 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤2,24234.6%
😁1,22018.8%
🔥1,18118.2%
👍65710.1%
🤣5248.09%
👏1181.82%
💯881.36%
😢701.08%
💩590.911%
⚡400.617%
🐳350.54%
🤡350.54%
👎280.432%
👌230.355%
🌚210.324%
🤔190.293%
🥰180.278%
🆒130.201%
❤‍🔥120.185%
🤬120.185%
15 further kinds640.988%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 70 of the 70 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,479 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 70 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (8.70%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 09:58 UTC≈33,700 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💙 💙 АРТЕМ КАРПУКАС В СБГ ШОУ! Артём ворвался в «Зенит» и за пару месяцев стал одним из самых ярких игроков осени в РПЛ. Позвали его в гости и поговорили не только о футболе. • Почему выбрал «Зенит», а не «Краснодар»? Как его переманивал Глушенков? Что происходит с «Локомотивом» и почему Пиняев до сих пор не раскрылся? • Обсудили конкуренцию с Барриосом и Веделом, Луиса Энрике и первые месяцы в Петербурге. • А ещё…

❤60🔥34🥰9❤‍🔥2

5 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC≈15,800 views72 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Каждый из нас?

❤40👍20🔥8😁4

4 Nov 2026, 09:56 UTC≈24,900 views187 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Ответ на главный вопрос. Остальное - завтра.

🔥108👍40😁27❤12

2 Nov 2026, 17:41 UTC≈19,200 views41 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

💙😂 ИТОГИ 13 ТУРА РПЛ В ПРЯМОМ ЭФИРЕ! • Две тысячи пенальти «Зенита» • Черчесов вместо Галактионова • «Краснодар» проиграл «Родине» Залетайте, мы уже в эфире: 🌐 ЮТУБ 🌐 ВК 🌐 ТВИТЧ

❤28🔥12🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 16:23 UTC≈2,590 views60 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Кстати, стрим сегодня в 20:30. Пенальти обсудим, конечно же и вот это вот все

👍50❤7👌2🤡1

25 Oct 2026, 18:01 UTC≈20,900 views55 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

⚡️️️️️️️ ИТОГИ 12 ТУРА В ПРЯМОМ ЭФИРЕ! • «Зенит» вернулся на первое место • «Динамо» и «Краснодар» теряют очки • «Спартак» вернулся (не править) Смотрим: 🌐 ЮТУБ 🌐 ВК 🌐 ТВИТЧ

❤37🔥18

25 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC≈3,990 views80 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Ну что вы тут, стрим ждёте? Часов в 9 стартанем

❤45👍26🔥6👎3

18 Oct 2026, 17:56 UTC≈23,500 views37 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

ИТОГИ 11 ТУРА В ПРЯМОМ ЭФИРЕ! - Победа "Зенита" - "Динамо" на первом месте - проблемы в "Краснодаре" Обсуждаем все прямо сейчас, залетайте: https://youtube.com/live/r3wirtO5fHY?feature=share https://youtube.com/live/r3wirtO5fHY?feature=share

❤27🔥8👍2

18 Oct 2026, 15:18 UTC≈4,900 views94 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤67👌17🤡7🔥2⚡1

14 Oct 2026, 14:44 UTC≈5,120 views99 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @rashen_footballPhoto

У Зенита Шилов и Кондаков в старте на игру с Махачкалой.. Кстати, это только второй раз в истории, когда парни вместе выходят в старте. Ровно год назад выходил в кубке на Оренбург Пока время до матча есть, посмотрите выпуск с Шиловым и Кондаковым, если не видели. Даже Аршавин его оценил, сказал наконец-то что-то нормальное сняли: https://youtu.be/SBIVWgJ4lfQ?si=HLDaxjhb-C_pKKJf

❤55👍28🔥12🥱4

12 Oct 2026, 14:22 UTC≈20,600 views199 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

👀👀👀 Смотреть до конца…

🤣154❤23👍11🤡7🔥4

12 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈29,100 views93 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔥️️️️️️ «КРАСНОДАР» - «ЗЕНИТ»: КАК ЭТО БЫЛО? Самое приятное, что можно сделать в понедельник - включить влог СБГ ШОУ с выезда в Краснодар и заново пережить эмоции от прекрасной победы «Зенита». Аршавин, Гурцкая, Нурик, Меламед, Новик, Ванюшов - все по ссылке 👇️️️️️️👇️️️️️️ 🌐 ЮТУБ 🌐 ВК

❤49🔥30👍14

Showing the 12 most recent of 70 posts we hold for @sbg_show. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Рашен Football
@rashen_football · 20,158
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 29 September 2026
#вЗените
@vzenite12 · 22,642
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 19 September 2026
Кафешка
@zenit_cafe · 25,635
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 September 2026
ФК Зенит | Zenit fans
@zenitfans · 20,900
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 September 2026
Зимин
@footballDiZzz · 24,577
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 16 September 2026
Футбольный клуб «Зенит»
@fczenit · 181,334
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Бесплатный Питер | Санкт-Петербург
@piter_free78 · 19,721
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 30 September 2026
DENZELLOFFICIAL
@denzellofficial · 38,014
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
WINLINE
@winline · 279,596
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 August 2026
Open the Doors | Дорский
@openthedoors · 25,469
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 14 September 2026
Ultras Action
@ultras_action · 31,869
Telegram ranks this channel #93 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СБГ ШОУ” (@sbg_show), 8,499 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbg_show.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.