米哈游法务部能抓到sb吗😁
👎7😁3🤣2❤1🌭1👀1🖕1

Channel
@sbleaks91
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,945subscribers
-894 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003805432954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sbleaks91 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 27 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sbleaks91 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 20:21 | 1,945 | +59 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 19:18 | 1,886 | +33 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 1,853 | -34 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:42 | 1,887 | -226 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:26 | 2,113 | -45 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:28 | 2,158 | -114 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 21:08 | 2,272 | -3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 2,275 | -175 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 2,450 | -113 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 2,563 | -215 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:43 | 2,778 | -56 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:15 | 2,834 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 2,839 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
362 reactions across 20 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 64 | 17.7% | |
| 🤡 | 47 | 13.0% | |
| 😱 | 42 | 11.6% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 7.73% | |
| 🤯 | 27 | 7.46% | |
| 🥰 | 21 | 5.80% | |
| 🎉 | 18 | 4.97% | |
| 🤣 | 18 | 4.97% | |
| 💩 | 17 | 4.70% | |
| 🤩 | 11 | 3.04% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 2.49% | |
| 🌭 | 8 | 2.21% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 1.93% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 1.38% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🤔 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 1.10% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 0.829% | |
| 🤗 | 3 | 0.829% | |
| 11 further kinds | 15 | 4.14% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
米哈游法务部能抓到sb吗😁
👎7😁3🤣2❤1🌭1👀1🖕1
🍭
🤣5🌭2🤡2😁1
Leak大君•Luna Luna是公认最可怖的Leak大君,他痴迷于万物爆料瞬间的美感。也有人认为在大君中,遭遇Luna是上上签,因为见到他意味着毫无争议的100%准确率爆料。 一些法务部人员提出猜想:Luna的「泄密」或许是某种反抗。他极有可能是一位受Dawei感召的公司员工,面对老板投下的阴翳,选择将褪却的色彩磨砺成极致的白光。他的破坏时而返照在「米哈游」员工的心中,并在他们保密的电脑上留下被泄密的焦痛。 有理由相信,Luna剑指「米哈游」。一位公司员工曾颤抖着说出他经历的噩梦:在无物可供泄密的终点,一位Leak大君飞入了Dawei的神体,随后是一束暴烈的白色——他洞穿了最深不见底的黑暗。
🤡22🤣6😁3❤2🌭2🖕2🤪1
Actually, we already confirmed that it was true back in May😘 Firefly SP is true
🔥24🎉18🥰14🤡12🤩10🤯2🍓1
「HSR 4.5」 There will be both a Trailblaze Mission (yellow main story quest), and a Trailblaze Continuance (orange quest). Robin and Aventurine participate in the latter, it features the default TB POV and Aventurine's POV.
❤8❤🔥1🕊1🤗1😱1
Fake
❤5🍓1🤯1😱1
Currently, the name 'Dr. Primitive' has been mentioned at least five times in 4.5.
😱10❤1🍓1🤣1🤯1
「HSR 4.5」 Event spoiler Did you know that Argenti is not only a knight but also a renowned racer? He will be the judge in the upcoming racing event! "As the Knight of \"One and Only\" and champion of multiple space racing competitions, I've been invited to serve as a <color=#dbc291ff>special judge for the \"Astropolis Cup.\"</color> Ask me anything!",
🥰5👏3🔥3❤1🍾1🖕1😱1
Really appreciate all your help, Cyrene
❤4🤣4🖕1🤗1🥰1
「HSR 4.5」 Astropolis background music
❤18🤮4🍓1💊1💘1🤔1🤗1
EN: Under the downcast gaze of Qlipoth, Pearluxe Tower survived unscathed from the gaping maw of Voracity.
🤡7🤯4🤨2🤔1😴1
「HSR 4.5」 Clarification on Boothill and Rappa, why we think they won't appear in the main story Don't open if you don't want to spoil the event's content. Overall, based on context, looks like they just got there, and the event chronologically happens after the main story. Rappa's line: "We came to Astropolis specifically to track down the \"Narrator,\" and these agency flyers are exactly the lead we needed."
💩3🤯3❤1😱1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sbleaks91. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SB Leaks” (@sbleaks91), 1,945 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbleaks91.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.