Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СБ Про Бизнес | Безопасность

Channel

СБ Про Бизнес | Безопасность

@sbprobiz

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,219subscribers

+25 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001642904442
TypeChannel
Username@sbprobiz
Created12 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sbprobiz

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,1942,2192,206.56 August 2026 — 2,194 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,195 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,196 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,201 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,206 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,209 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,211 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,212 subscribers29 August 2026 — 2,209 subscribers1 September 2026 — 2,207 subscribers4 September 2026 — 2,210 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,218 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,217 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,219 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net +25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,190–2,223 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:392,219+2
13 Sept 2026, 03:202,217-1
9 Sept 2026, 13:212,218+8
4 Sept 2026, 09:212,210+3
1 Sept 2026, 02:582,207-2
29 Aug 2026, 07:172,209-3
26 Aug 2026, 09:432,212+1
23 Aug 2026, 04:032,211+2
20 Aug 2026, 00:522,209+3
16 Aug 2026, 19:442,206+5
12 Aug 2026, 23:022,201+5
9 Aug 2026, 17:532,196+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:502,195+1
6 Aug 2026, 07:072,194first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 19 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 21s
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

179 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7139.7%
😁3318.4%
🔥2614.5%
custom 53145230953341608902212.3%
👏95.03%
🤝63.35%
52.79%
🤣52.79%
😱21.12%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.35%
1 of 23 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
233
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
599
over 22 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFJGHoa117 August 20267 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC233 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2W5zFJGHoa1Photo

В девелопменте и строительстве крупные финансовые потери редко возникают внезапно. Обычно они закладываются еще на этапе планирования. Судебный процесс — это уже следствие. Работать с причиной на старте надежнее и обходится дешевле. В канале юридической практики «Опорный контур» разбирается профилактика: как находить уязвимости проекта до того, как они приведут к остановке работ или суду. О чем пишут на канале: — Как

👍4

6 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC266 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Друзья! Мы скоро начинаем! Присоединиться по ссылке: https://vk.ru/call/join/-5RaVs8r4W3LY7vsuW_LtSm54OYOLDCAbW2l83ZCmPs Ссылка с паролем(если первая ссылка не работает): https://vk.ru/call/198-607-516 (Пароль для входа: AZFm2U) Ссылка на онлайн-трансляцию(без возможности общаться в прямом эфире): https://vk.ru/video-211189957_456239342

1👍1

5 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC357 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Внимание! Стрим! Мы обсуждали, что делают СБшники, потом мы обсуждали, почему СБ нужна в Малом и Среднем бизнесе (МСБ)! Пришла пора обсудить и разобраться в вопросе - А СКОЛЬКО ПОЛУЧАЮТ КОЛЛЕГИ РАБОТАЮЩИЕ В СЛУЖБАХ БЕЗОПАСНОСТИ? Директора, начальники отделов, специалисты и менеджеры отрасли корпоративной безопасности... Коллеги из регионов, не из МСК и СПБ, готовьте валерьянку или что покрепче😉 Будет волнительно

👍7🤝21😁1

4 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC390 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Новости от наших друзей: 📣 Вышел в свет августовский номер журнала «Директор по безопасности»№08-2026 ❗️ Главная тема номера – Контроль закупок В номере можно прочитать о том, как превратить совещания в способ управления вместо его имитации, как построить стратегию безопасности, основанную на доверии, как сделать ИИ полноценным сотрудником компании, занимающимся информационной безопасностью. Кроме того, на страниц

👍8🤝3

4 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC≈3,180 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Внимание опрос !!! Мы запускаем опрос по инструментарию СБ, и это не формальность. Мы реально хотим понять наши боли и пожелания, чтобы прокачать наш арсенал. Насколько удобно вам работать с теми инструментами, которые мы все используем для проверок? Все ли работает как часы или есть места, где хочется все сломать и переделать? Нам важно понять, насколько текущий набор средств отвечает современным вызовам, удобен ли

👍51👏1

3 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC481 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Экономическая безопасность в МСБ: новая реальность и новые требования Малый и Средний Бизнес всё чаще сталкивается с рисками, которые уже невозможно игнорировать: рост киберпреступности, ужесточение регулирования, ответственность за персональные данные, налоговая осмотрительность, утечки коммерческой тайны. Статистика показывает — вопрос для бизнеса сегодня не «случится ли инцидент?», а «когда он случится и наскольк

👍6👏4🔥3custom 53145230953341608901

2 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC468 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Обвиняя кого-то в "мелком хулиганстве" 20.1 КоАП РФ, будьте вежливы☝️ 🤣 #сбюмор

🤣5🔥2😁2😱1

1 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC494 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

В стремлении к подвигу, нет преград! 🤣 #сбюмор

😁8👍1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 07:55 UTC597 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#забугром Сокращение потерь становится задачей всего бизнеса, а не просто функцией по предотвращению убытков, и в этом направлении наблюдается устойчивый прогресс благодаря стратегиям, основанным на человеческом факторе и технологиях. Интересная публикация в https://www.fmi.org/blog/view/fmi-blog/2026/07/22/the-shrink-story-is-changing Автор: Том Косгроув, директор по связям с промышленностью, FMI В своей небольшо

👍3custom 53145230953341608903🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 11:38 UTC536 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как эффективно общаться с ИИ. Часть 8;9 Типичные ошибки, Чек-лист и итог. Мы продолжаем публиковать серию обучающих материалов по взаимодействию с ИИ. На этот раз финальные части 8 и 9 из главы "Как эффективно общаться с ИИ". Из названия понятно, что речь пойдет о типичных ошибках, фразах исправления и чек листе проверки перед отправкой запроса. Следующая тема будет называться "Как создавать промты". Автор-составите

👍3🔥3custom 53145230953341608901

29 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC526 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Друзья, информация о том, кто мы. Для тех, кто недавно подписался на наш ресурс🤝 Спасибо что вы с нами🤗 С уважением @vladimir_sbprobiz

👍4custom 53145230953341608902🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @sbprobiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Ленинградский Cyber - страж
@LenCyber78 · 147,622
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 18 August 2026
Social Graph News
@social_graph_channel_ru · 24,975
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СБ Про Бизнес | Безопасность” (@sbprobiz), 2,219 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sbprobiz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.