Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мама, у меня шизматоглоттис!

Channel

Мама, у меня шизматоглоттис!

@schismatoglottis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

600subscribers

+17 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001771811105
TypeChannel
Username@schismatoglottis
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/schismatoglottis

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 48% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5806005906 August 2026 — 583 subscribers7 August 2026 — 583 subscribers14 August 2026 — 584 subscribers22 August 2026 — 583 subscribers30 August 2026 — 580 subscribers8 September 2026 — 599 subscribers16 September 2026 — 600 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 577–603 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 10:39600+1
8 Sept 2026, 16:00599+19
30 Aug 2026, 16:34580-3
22 Aug 2026, 23:44583-1
14 Aug 2026, 23:24584+1
7 Aug 2026, 10:08583no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:48583first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

317 reactions across 20 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13743.2%
😁3912.3%
💯319.78%
🔥257.89%
🙏185.68%
🥰144.42%
🙈134.10%
🤣134.10%
👍92.84%
❤‍🔥82.52%
🤝72.21%
🌚10.315%
💅10.315%
💔10.315%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 317 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @schismatoglottis. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC131 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

напоминание про кофе с корицей

15

5 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC155 views40 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

«Я колдую», — когда ты это говоришь, голова инстинктивно вжимается в плечи, особенно, когда ты говоришь это среди маглов. Потому что, положа руку на сердце, это позор. Сразу чувствуешь себя немного Блиновской, немного Кашпировским, будто, когда откроются ворота во второй дом, придется заряжать воду через экран (за донат). То, что магия напрямую никак не связана с заработком денег, точно так же, как с этим не связан н

20💯13🤝7

5 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC163 views14 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

На правах того, что за нижеуказанные работы мне никто не заплатил, человек не был моим клиентом, и несмотря на довольно большие потраты ресурса, я еще и получила блокировку по причине «ты не нравишься моей девушке» (к слову, я сама этих двоих и подпихнула друг к другу, чтобы не дай бог внимание не обратилось на меня), расскажу, про то, как обрывали связи. Инструктаж был дан полный: если в течение недели начинают всп

🙈131

5 Aug 2026, 11:59 UTC167 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Был (и все еще есть) смешной рабочий кейс, где обосрались абсолютно все, и единственно верным был только один тейк и только одного медиума: «Мы решаем следствие, а не причину». Ирония в том, что дойти до причины, пока ты не разберешься со следствием — затруднительно. Все остальные — либо вообще не попали, либо попали настолько неоднозначно, что за руку схватить виноватого не представляется возможным. Это не говорит

4

5 Aug 2026, 11:48 UTC169 views18 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026

Вижу, как бесконечно педалируется мысль про взаимодействия с божествами и про собственные силы. «Не сомневайтесь, ни в чем никогда не сомневайтесь». Это плохой подход. Сомневайтесь во всем, что видите. Перепроверяйте каждый факт. Создавайте рабочие группы, делайте перекрестные проверки. Всегда задайтесь вопросом «зачем?», «что мне это даст?», «что я за это дам?», «кому это выгодно?». Никогда ни в чем не сомневаются

💯153

5 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC169 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁12🤣8

5 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC170 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁118

4 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC177 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

когда на словах Леонардо, а на деле Рафаэль

🤣51

4 Aug 2026, 15:02 UTC179 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Там правки пришли», — думаю я. Смешная история, впрочем, вышла. Это был первый раз, как я сдала А. работу вовремя. Потому что были случаи, когда я сдавала ее ой как не вовремя, или не сдавала ее вообще; где-то сдавала и мы оба понимали, что обосрались, потому что влезли в чуждый нам лор (привет, комикс по Starcratf). Так вот, я-то сдала работу вовремя, а дальше с работой начал происходить сущий кошмар. Не вдаваясь в

3💔1

4 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC188 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁106

4 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC189 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Приходит как-то к практик к Шалиму, а Шалим ему долго-долго показывает каузал, «акаузал», связи, причины, следствия, но в конечном итоге в этой развеселой серии Скуби Ду под маской монстра неизбежно оказываемся мы сами. 🤡

13❤‍🔥5🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @schismatoglottis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мама, у меня шизматоглоттис!” (@schismatoglottis), 600 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/schismatoglottis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.