Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for علوم ثالث متوسط علية شمراني 👩🏻‍🔬

Channel

علوم ثالث متوسط علية شمراني 👩🏻‍🔬

@sciencealiah

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

16,822subscribers

-862 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001245045879
TypeChannel
Username@sciencealiah
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held22
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sciencealiah

Growth

16,82217,68417,25314 August 2026 — 17,684 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,673 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,668 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,679 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,675 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,667 subscribers20 August 2026 — 17,640 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,633 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,545 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,416 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,344 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,312 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,293 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,285 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,270 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,153 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,069 subscribers1 September 2026 — 16,978 subscribers2 September 2026 — 16,947 subscribers3 September 2026 — 16,914 subscribers6 September 2026 — 16,877 subscribers9 September 2026 — 16,822 subscribers14 August 20269 September 2026
22 measurements spanning 26 days, net -862. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,693–17,813 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 17:3816,822-55
6 Sept 2026, 07:5916,877-37
3 Sept 2026, 23:1816,914-33
2 Sept 2026, 17:3716,947-31
1 Sept 2026, 13:3416,978-91
31 Aug 2026, 13:1217,069-84
30 Aug 2026, 14:0417,153-117
29 Aug 2026, 16:5517,270-15
28 Aug 2026, 18:4417,285-8
27 Aug 2026, 20:5317,293-19
26 Aug 2026, 19:3317,312-32
25 Aug 2026, 21:4417,344-72
24 Aug 2026, 21:3617,416-129
23 Aug 2026, 07:0817,545-88
21 Aug 2026, 16:4817,633-7
20 Aug 2026, 14:5217,640-27
19 Aug 2026, 17:1717,667-8
18 Aug 2026, 16:0617,675-4
17 Aug 2026, 18:4317,679+11
16 Aug 2026, 14:3617,668first reading

Engagement

32 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 37 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.3%
avg views ÷ 16,822 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,060
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.156%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 32 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held32 (23 June 202631 August 2026)
Views total24,730
Reactions total36
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

126 reactions across 23 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 77.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9777.0%
👍2015.9%
👏43.17%
🔥32.38%
😢21.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 126 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 02:34 UTC≈1,450 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026

https://sites.google.com/view/etteee?usp=sharing

👏1

29 Aug 2026, 23:24 UTC≈2,420 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

أسئلة مهارات تفكير عليا لدرس اسلوب العلم

👍4

29 Aug 2026, 23:20 UTC≈1,960 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اسئلة مهارات تفكير عليا عند درس اسلوب العلم

👍2

29 Aug 2026, 23:15 UTC≈1,760 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

أسئلة مهارات تفكير عليا لدرس اسلوب العلم

👍1

29 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC≈1,740 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

اسئلة مهارات تفكير عليا عن درس أسلوب العلم

👍1

29 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC≈1,810 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

درس اسلوب العلم

😢21👍1

29 Aug 2026, 22:43 UTC≈2,010 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ملخص درس اسلوب العلم

👍21

29 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,720 viewsread 3 September 2026

الوحدة الاولى : الفصل الأول : طبيعة العلم

29 Aug 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,770 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026

عودا حميدا و كل عام و انتم بخير

6👍2👏2

24 Aug 2026, 15:58 UTC≈2,790 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Sciences_203File

File, posted without a caption

3👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @sciencealiah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

قناة الاختبارات- التعليم السعودي
@basooomh · 110,977
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
قناة اختبارات نافس
@Nationalexams1 · 64,644
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 August 2026
قناة المدرب مخلد الروقي
@Professionalgrowth1 · 37,803
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 31 August 2026
تبسيط الاختبار التربوي( المدرب صالح الخبراني )
@salehalkabrani · 83,190
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“علوم ثالث متوسط علية شمراني 👩🏻‍🔬” (@sciencealiah), 16,822 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sciencealiah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.