Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Scientifically

Channel

Scientifically

@scientificallly

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,166subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001042571664
TypeChannel
Username@scientificallly
Created30 May 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/scientificallly

Growth

3,1663,1743,17022 August 2026 — 3,170 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,171 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,174 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,171 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,167 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,166 subscribers22 August 20265 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,165–3,175 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 21:163,166-1
1 Sept 2026, 16:253,167-4
29 Aug 2026, 06:543,171-3
26 Aug 2026, 00:173,174+3
23 Aug 2026, 06:383,171+1
22 Aug 2026, 17:013,170first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 July 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

65 reactions across 18 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4264.6%
🔥1015.4%
👍913.8%
🙊23.08%
💩11.54%
🗿11.54%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2025 to 19 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Dec 2025, 17:38 UTC≈1,340 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026

The Final Silence: Thermodynamics and the End of Time ​In the grand theater of the cosmos, every star, every galaxy, and every heartbeat is governed by a single, ruthless law: entropy. It is the tax on existence that nature collects every second, and eventually, it will lead us to the ultimate bankruptcy — the Heat Death of the Universe. ​First conceptualized by Lord Kelvin in the 1850s, this theory doesn’t describ

7

21 Dec 2025, 18:31 UTC≈1,230 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

1🗿1

19 Oct 2025, 09:42 UTC≈1,510 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Death, Taxes, and the Return to the Mean In nature, markets, and human life, one law quietly rules: extremes never last. Booms and crashes, genius and failure, record profits and collapses — all are just swings around an invisible center that everything eventually returns to. This is the law of regression to the mean, discovered by 19th-century polymath Francis Galton — cousin of Darwin and father of modern statisti

4👍1

10 Oct 2025, 14:43 UTC≈1,170 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Rethinking Your Career — Like a Scientist When I was 22, the idea of “career planning” felt foreign — something for overly strategic people, not for those of us busy doing “real work.” I thought ambition meant working hard and hoping things would somehow fall into place. But your career moves forward whether you think about it or not. If you don’t steer it, external forces — institutions, managers, luck — will. Th

6

1 Oct 2025, 19:02 UTC992 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Indicators That an Individual May Exhibit Unfavorable Character Traits Despite an Appearing Amiable Persona Seven Behavioral Indicators 1. Conditional Altruism The individual’s acts of kindness are contingent upon personal benefit. They behave courteously or generously when there is a potential advantage (e.g., social, professional), but show disregard or disrespect toward those from whom no benefit accrues. This s

🔥1

21 Sept 2025, 10:19 UTC816 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Rethinking Confidence: A Scientific Perspective When people ask, “Why are you so confident?”, the assumption is often that confidence stems from an absence of fear, doubt, or hesitation. Yet research in psychology suggests otherwise: confidence is less about eradicating fear and more about how we relate to it. Many individuals spend years searching for confidence through self-help strategies, external validation, o

2

30 Aug 2025, 03:17 UTC855 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

The Fascinating World of Genetics: What Your DNA Says About You Genetics is like the instruction manual for life. Inside every cell of your body, there’s DNA — a long code made up of just four “letters” (A, T, C, G). These letters combine in billions of ways to decide everything from your eye color to how your body processes food. Here are some mind-blowing facts about your genes: You’re 99.9% the same as everyone

3

26 Aug 2025, 15:12 UTC806 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Your body carries around a galaxy of its own — the microbiome. Trillions of bacteria, viruses, and fungi live inside you, mostly in your gut. Far from being “germs to kill,” they’re partners in survival: they help digest food, train the immune system, and even influence mood through the gut–brain axis. Here’s the wild part: the number of microbial genes in your body is estimated to be at least 100 times greater than

👍31

23 Aug 2025, 11:39 UTC830 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026

People sometimes ask me: “But you scientists must already know everything, right? So why are you always arguing?” Yeah, sure. As if on day one of university they hand us a secret folder with the answers to the universe. Spoiler: there’s no folder. Not even a USB stick. Scientists don’t argue because they’re clueless or can’t agree on “the truth.” They argue because that’s how science breathes. Debate is like the gym

3🙊2

22 Aug 2025, 21:43 UTC729 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Your world feels solid, but at the smallest scale, it’s almost empty space. Particles flicker between possibilities until observed — reality itself waits for attention. In quantum physics, certainty dissolves into probability. The universe is not a fixed script, but a dance of chances, always unfolding. The mind doesn’t just watch the quantum world. In some mysterious way, it helps bring it into being.

👍2💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scientificallly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Chemistry
@chemistry · 34,546
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
MPSC Science
@MPSCScience · 59,035
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scientifically” (@scientificallly), 3,166 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scientificallly.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.