Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Scytho-Sarmatian

Channel

Scytho-Sarmatian

@scythosarmatian

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

246subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002480559177
TypeChannel
Username@scythosarmatian
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/scythosarmatian

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

227246236.56 August 2026 — 228 subscribers7 August 2026 — 228 subscribers13 August 2026 — 227 subscribers26 August 2026 — 228 subscribers2 September 2026 — 233 subscribers11 September 2026 — 245 subscribers18 September 2026 — 246 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 43 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 224–249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 20:39246+1
11 Sept 2026, 09:42245+12
2 Sept 2026, 23:46233+5
26 Aug 2026, 21:26228+1
13 Aug 2026, 10:24227-1
7 Aug 2026, 03:00228no change
6 Aug 2026, 21:03228first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

16 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥425.0%
❤318.8%
❤‍🔥318.8%
✍212.5%
🎅16.25%
👎16.25%
💊16.25%
🥱16.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC35 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @uzbekdnaPhoto

Узбек из Ташкента Род: Ходжа Q1 → Q-FT112504 По данным Family Finder, у узбека из Ташкента определена Y-гаплогруппа Q-FT112504. Её общий предок жил примерно в 1900 году до н. э. Субклад восходит к древним северным евразийцам (ANE). Древнейший образец предковой ветви Q-F1161 принадлежал западносибирскому охотнику-собирателю эпохи мезолита. Позднее родственные линии встречались в Майкопской, Ямной, Андроновской, Сру…

🥱1

1 Aug 2026, 18:39 UTC56 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

Какие субклады R1a-Z93 присутствуют в сибирских тюркских группах? Источник: указан на графике. https://x.com/aboutadna

30 Jul 2026, 13:32 UTC60 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @dargwadnaFile

Почему «встать в корень» Y-дерева — это иллюзия, а не повод для гордости Знакомая сцена: человек видит на дереве FamilyTreeDNA длинную прямую линию, уходящую вглубь веков, и заявляет: «Мы в самом корне, ветка наша, вы все пошли от нас». На самом деле эта линия говорит ровно одно: с ним пока никто не совпал. Это не биология, это дыра в данных. Собрал справочник по чтению дерева и раздела Discover. PDF, 19 страниц, …

26 Jul 2026, 00:12 UTC778 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🐴 Скифы и их внешность

✍2❤‍🔥1🔥1

23 Jul 2026, 17:32 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @caucasdnaPhoto

🧬 Как узнать более точно отцовскую ветку в один клик и бесплатно? Многие уже сделали ДНК-тесты, например, на 37 STR маркеров. Но часто лаборатории выдают очень размытый результат. Например, пишут общую группу J1-Z1842, под которую подходит половина Кавказа. Чтобы узнать более глубокий субклад, лаборатории просят заказывать дорогой тест Big Y. Это оправдано. Но когда нет такой возможности, всё равно есть решение, соз…

👎1

22 Jul 2026, 19:48 UTC120 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Элитное династическое правление у кочевников евразийских степей эпохи раннего железного века по данным палеоДНК Мы представляем полногеном. данные по 85 индивидам (38 представителей элиты и 47 не принадлежащих к ним), включая 45 образцов, секвенир. впервые, как и данные для скифского «Золотого человека». В среде элиты выявлены род. браки, сниж. эффективной численности популяции и наличие связей, обуслов. идентичност…

21 Jul 2026, 21:34 UTC113 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @turkicdnaPhoto

«Прото-тюркский прокси» Согласно определению Daniel Tabin, генетический компонент «ядра хунну» (Core Xiongnu) тождественен прото-тюркскому компоненту, связывающему группы Shaz и Lir. Для «ядра хунну» характерна высокая доля восточно-азиатского происхождения (ок. 80–100%); в контексте хунну этот компонент отличается от генетических профилей, характерных для скифо-сарматских групп. Источники указаны на схеме.

❤2

20 Jul 2026, 21:53 UTC97 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @R1aZ93Photo

🇰🇬 Кыргызы — удивительный народ, поскольку знач. часть их отцовских линий восходит к древним степным популяциям, связанным с ранними индо-иранскими и скифскими группами, а не к исконным вост.-азиат. тюркским истокам. Более того, они обладают одним из самых высоких показателей частоты этих зап.-евраз. отцовских маркеров среди тюркояз. народов, несмотря на то, что сегодня их самосознание является сугубо тюркским [1]. Е…

❤‍🔥2

30 Jun 2026, 12:28 UTC210 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @EurasiadnaPhoto

Genetic Map for Central Asian Bronze Age Ancestry Генетическая карта наследия бронзового века Центральной Азии https://t.me/Eurasiadna

❤1

27 Jun 2026, 20:51 UTC≈1,330 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🐴 30+ сарматских образцов из работы Akbari et al. 2026, добавленных на древо FTDNA, относятся к субкладу R-Y57 гаплогруппы R-Z93. https://discover.familytreedna.com/y-dna/R-Y57/tree 🗡️ Судя по палеоДНК данным, субклад R-Y57 был довольно широко распространён среди сарматов, составляя почти половину от всех их образцов в гаплогруппе R-Z93. Большинство совр. носителей R-Y57 - это жители Зап. Европы и частично Кавказа,…

🔥3🎅1💊1

26 Jun 2026, 18:53 UTC149 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @scythian_worldPhoto

Для тех кто не сидит в ВК ЧТО ПОЧИТАТЬ: К проблеме реконструкции системы сезонных миграций кочевников Южного Приуралья в VI–IV вв. до н.э. Владимир Николаевич Мышкин. Самарский государственный социально-педагогический университет, Самара, Россия. #сарматы #скифы #индоевропейцы #кочевники #археология

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @scythosarmatian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scytho-Sarmatian” (@scythosarmatian), 246 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scythosarmatian.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.