Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for غــرآم المُحبين

Channel

غــرآم المُحبين

@sd_3w

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,620subscribers

-490 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001234131607
TypeChannel
Username@sd_3w
Description​ـ على ذاك الطريق اللي يسمونه غرام أحباب شـمـال سـيـنـاء 🇪🇬
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sd_3w

Growth

32,62033,11032,8656 August 2026 — 33,110 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,110 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,093 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,081 subscribers9 August 2026 — 33,092 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,057 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,055 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,015 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,004 subscribers14 August 2026 — 32,978 subscribers17 August 2026 — 32,955 subscribers18 August 2026 — 32,962 subscribers19 August 2026 — 32,924 subscribers20 August 2026 — 32,928 subscribers21 August 2026 — 32,902 subscribers23 August 2026 — 32,871 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,845 subscribers25 August 2026 — 32,806 subscribers27 August 2026 — 32,769 subscribers28 August 2026 — 32,756 subscribers29 August 2026 — 32,757 subscribers30 August 2026 — 32,760 subscribers31 August 2026 — 32,723 subscribers1 September 2026 — 32,697 subscribers2 September 2026 — 32,679 subscribers3 September 2026 — 32,651 subscribers5 September 2026 — 32,620 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -490. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,547–33,184 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 03:1732,620-31
3 Sept 2026, 10:5932,651-28
2 Sept 2026, 08:4232,679-18
1 Sept 2026, 05:1632,697-26
31 Aug 2026, 06:1332,723-37
30 Aug 2026, 03:4632,760+3
29 Aug 2026, 00:5332,757+1
28 Aug 2026, 04:0732,756-13
27 Aug 2026, 01:0532,769-37
25 Aug 2026, 21:3432,806-39
25 Aug 2026, 00:1132,845-26
23 Aug 2026, 13:1732,871-31
21 Aug 2026, 21:3732,902-26
20 Aug 2026, 19:4532,928+4
19 Aug 2026, 18:4532,924-38
18 Aug 2026, 19:5532,962+7
17 Aug 2026, 17:0432,955-23
14 Aug 2026, 16:2632,978-26
13 Aug 2026, 05:1633,004-11
12 Aug 2026, 04:5733,015first reading

Engagement

213 posts held, back to 12 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.306%
avg views ÷ 32,620 subscribers
Avg views / post
99.7
183 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
183
of 213 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 183 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026
Posts held213 (12 July 20266 September 2026)
Views total18,254
Reactions total322
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Sept 2026, 16:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
308
Videos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

619 reactions across 40 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
45773.8%
💘16226.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 213 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 619 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 213 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
158
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 213 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
20
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sd_3w. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 213 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 July 2026 to 6 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Sept 2026, 16:00 UTC4 viewsread 6 September 2026

اضغط على اكثر ايموجي يطابق حالتك حالياً؟😌🌸 😡 😔 😂 😍 👕 👔 👚 👕 👖 👖 👖 👖

5 Sept 2026, 12:52 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 5 September 2026

🔒 هذه همسة سرية للجميع يمكن للجميع روئيتها

💘1

5 Sept 2026, 00:31 UTC3 viewsread 5 September 2026

اضغط على اكثر ايموجي يطابق حالتك حالياً؟😌🌸 😡 😔 😂 😍 👕 👔 👚 👕 👖 👖 👖 👖

4 Sept 2026, 18:00 UTC60 viewsread 5 September 2026

وصلوا النجوم 10⭐️ وتفاعلوا 👈❤️

4 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTC5 viewsread 4 September 2026

• دعم النوايفّ لـ القنوات المتفاعلة . - الدعم والنشر بنفس القناه . - الدعم يوميا بإذن الله . - لـ الاشتراك : @fdx6n المحضورين : @zrii5ibot

4 Sept 2026, 07:49 UTC10 views1 reactionsread 4 September 2026

تفاعلوا ي حلوين 👈❤️ وعدلوا النجوم 🌷

1

3 Sept 2026, 22:03 UTC1 viewsread 3 September 2026

تفاعلوا 👈❤️ وزودوا النجوم شوي لاهنتوا

Showing the 12 most recent of 213 posts we hold for @sd_3w. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

﮼彡ᓚɹɹɹɹ̤ᓗ̣lgබ|‏ℍ𝔸𝕎𝕆𝔸𝕁𝔼𝕊
@mmeettp · 6,239
#1
بُـوُح قَديِم 🦌
@gh631 · 6,301
#2
˼العهد
@alahdjii · 3,202
#3
روح ﺎلبـــداوهہٌ .♡
@exe_4e · 9,357
#4
شتاتيّ
@llili21 · 14,788
#5
دّار نَجد
@s_56yy · 6,953
#6
مرفـى .
@wwtii_90seh · 5,893
#7
الغنـّج .
@r505iai · 8,716
#8
‏ نساير .
@RY_I_S · 2,720
#9
شقاوي .
@xllon_6 · 5,196
#10
الظبيِ𓄄
@zishsa · 10,174
#11
طاريَ .
@EETTTl · 7,739
#12
قعيد - 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟕
@Il1PP · 1,683
#13
ربيع القلوب 🌴🤍
@ij_fi · 2,645
#14
- ˼نسّسِيان˹ ﮼
@anm234i · 2,544
#15
ساهيَ .
@LlllXi9 · 8,092
#16
صدقه جاريه♥️
@exexse · 3,061
#17
طَيِّبَةً
@llxzlliiii · 5,538
#18
Drowned .
@ll5iz · 9,293
#19
دروب .
@a_3ii8 · 12,051
#20

@e9lul · 9,060
#21
عـذيٌل 𓍼ོ'
@viixcp · 14,528
#22
𓃴بـِٰ۫ـِ۬ـِۧ۬ـِٰ۬وح قـِـِۧ۬ـِ۬ـِٰ۫ديـِم
@IITT411 · 1,518
#23
ملى
@MLIIS3 · 16,633
#24
ي مٌحبين ﺂلنبي🤍🌷.
@AAAAAr222 · 2,481
#25
غادروا.
@iixil33 · 3,135
#26
ᥫ᭡յgɕɹɹ̈̇ɹg | յɕɹɹ̈̇ɹ
@sh3rwsh3wrr · 4,250
#27
⌯ ششــ͢عـۦـوࢪي !
@f_aaaj · 5,387
#28
رَو .
@r505iri · 9,491
#29
حڪاوۍ "۶ـــشاق ♕
@asdmnbc · 4,604
#30
أَرِجْ
@atirj711 · 708
#31
­­­­­­شمّري .
@rmail11 · 7,933
#32
اجر لـي ولأهلي 💛 .
@pasi1l · 3,157
#33
EV🇬🇧
@P_4_F · 3,817
#34
جاهّي
@Qiiii612 · 7,099
#35
ظبّي شبوه.
@jojo_716 · 12,503
#36
ريّـام
@UII2V · 4,597
#37
غـــــࢪبــه🦅.
@rg505r_r · 3,527
#38
‏{رب إشـرح لــي صــدري}
@r5_vc · 693
#39
دجىّ
@lllixn · 6,924
#40
مشاعر .
@g0riuNMM · 5,669
#41
🇶🇦
@an1_505 · 7,441
#42
᷂طوارييّ .
@mradeles · 324
#43
𝐘 𝟕
@Ylli07 · 3,509
#44
لواهيب .
@breeze_57 · 8,009
#45
نبض
@QQVQ6 · 17,707
#46
♯̶بـﯙꪆح﮼بـدﯙꪆيـه⁽⇣
@maiopv · 3,290
#47
غيثَْ
@IBr_h48 · 3,336
#48
شـٰـ͢ـعـوࢪ𓆩🤎𓆪
@waled101po1 · 4,828
#49
ً
@Ejjl2 · 9,910
#50
◟ ᴋʜ ◝︎
@khh9x · 1,190
#51
أجر ❣️.
@llire3 · 1,862
#52
اﭑۿــۅجٍَــس بڪَِكٍْ
@w3_0u111 · 10,377
#53
♯̶ مَـراسـِيـلْ🌷|˹
@y4ex101yasser · 5,096
#54
َ
@eiiil6 · 12,611
#55
شُعوَر ♡ 🇸🇦 .
@t_5_h · 22,041
#56
بَــعْثَـرَة🤎.
@M_S_5_hgjjjjbvdx · 164
#57
فرص عمل
@fffwp1 · 5,816
#58

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 5 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

شَغف♫
@Hillli86 · 57,334
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“غــرآم المُحبين” (@sd_3w), 32,620 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sd_3w.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.