Channel
@sdghhjjhh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,753subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001369417376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sdghhjjhh |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sdghhjjhh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 1,753 | +2 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 1,751 | no change |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 1,751 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 12 (10 August 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,525 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
الرد على شبهة الوهابي خالد الوصابي الذي يقول كيف الباقر و الصادق في الحجاز والرواة العراقيين يروون أحاديث عنهما والصادق والباقر لم يسافروا الى العراق حتى يأخذ الرواة العراقيين من الباقر والصادق عليهما السلام
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
كتبنا الرد على شبهة الإمام علي عليه السلام قطع يد سارق رسول الله صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم كان يقضي بين الناس بالبينات وليس بعلم الغيب
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
@qweepikgo/ اسلام عليكم اخوان اي واحد عنده شبهة يتواصل وياي وبل خدمه
Signed مصطفى
رد على شبهة انو الامام علي بن ابي طالب كان يدخل رئسه بين فخذين امرأة
Signed مصطفى
رد شبهة وكلتا يديه يمين
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
هنا المخالف السني يقول ان النبي يسهو و الروايه ضعيفة بسبب تيم بن عبد الله بن تيم القرشي
Signed مصطفى
تدليس المخالف السني واخفاء السند في بحار الأنوار ووضع غلاف الكتاب فوق السند في صفحة 7 في كتاب بحار الأنوار
Signed مصطفى
رد على الوهابية الذين يقولون أئمة الشيعة افضل من الأنبياء عليهم السلام في كتبهم أبي بكر وعمر مثل الملائكة والأنبياء عليهم السلام يعني بدرجة ومقام الملائكة والأنبياء عليهم السلام
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
كتبنا دفاع أمير المؤمنين عليه السلام عن السيدة فاطمة الزهراء عليها السلام لو لا وصية رسول الله لقتل عمر بن الخطاب
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
يامن تتهمون الإمام علي عليه السلام بأنه لم يدافع عن فاطمة الزهراء عليها السلام عليكم ان تتهموا خليفتكم نعثل الذي لم يدافع عن زوجته التي نشرت شعرها وقطعوا أصابعها
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
رد شبهة على ان الإمام المهدي عليه السلام يقتل ذراري بني أمية ومالهم ذنب في كتبهم الصحابي عبد الله ابن سلام يقول وليقتلن بدم عثمان الذين قتلوه والذين في أصلابهم والذين في أصلاب أصلابهم
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
1-الوهابي يقول لك أهل الكوفة من قتلوا الإمام الحسين عليه السلام قل له أهل المدينة المنورة من قتلوا عثمان بن عفان 2- الوهابي يقول لك شيعة الحسين من خذلوه قل له شيعة عثمان بن عفان كذلك خذلوه والبادي اظلم
Signed ✍️ العـــراقـــي ٣١٣
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sdghhjjhh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“الرد على شبهات المخالفين” (@sdghhjjhh), 1,753 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdghhjjhh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.