Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сёрч • Digital HR

Channel

Сёрч • Digital HR

@search_hragency

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

606subscribers

+54 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003866579875
TypeChannel
Username@search_hragency
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 19 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/search_hragency

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

5526065796 August 2026 — 552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 553 subscribers6 August 2026 — 553 subscribers12 August 2026 — 559 subscribers19 August 2026 — 561 subscribers26 August 2026 — 565 subscribers1 September 2026 — 566 subscribers11 September 2026 — 591 subscribers19 September 2026 — 606 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
9 measurements spanning 44 days, net +54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 544–614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 03:58606+15
11 Sept 2026, 02:38591+25
1 Sept 2026, 16:07566+1
26 Aug 2026, 03:34565+4
19 Aug 2026, 12:44561+2
12 Aug 2026, 21:28559+6
6 Aug 2026, 18:17553no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:22553+1
6 Aug 2026, 01:49552first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

345 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤11633.6%
🔥10430.1%
👍9828.4%
💯154.35%
💘82.32%
🗿20.58%
👎10.29%
😁10.29%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 345 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 15 we hold a reading for · 13%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @search_hragency. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 June 2026 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 16:22 UTC467 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤7🔥7👍4💯1

29 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC609 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥10❤6💯5

29 Jul 2026, 13:48 UTC661 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Дружеское напоминание — эфир уже сегодня! 🤩 поговорим про ошибки, которые мешают получить оффер 🤩 обсудим хитрости при составлении резюме 🤩 и разберёмся, как договориться о максимально высокой зарплате А также наш СЕО Кирилл Абросимов разберёт несколько ваших резюме и расскажет, как можно их прокачать. CV принимаем в личке менеджера @recruitment_search Места еще остались, участие бесплатное, залетайте 🤩

❤8👍6💯3

28 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC522 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«К сожалению, мы сделали выбор в пользу другого кандидата». Если вы хоть раз получали такое сообщение — этот эфир для вас. Вместе с автором канала Ханти Анфисой Ефимовой разберём 10 ошибок, из-за которых вам месяцами не дают оффер. А ещё подскажем, как договориться о максимально высокой зарплате. Встречаемся завтра в 19:00, бесплатная регистрация тут 🤩

🔥9👍7❤5🗿1

22 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈7,000 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Вы сильный спец, а оффера нет месяцами? 1 — Вы не задаете вопросов о компании и позиции 2 — Вместо достижений на прошлом месте перечисляете обязанности И это только начало В прямом эфире разберём 10 распространённых ошибок, которые мешают получать топовые офферы! Его проведёт фаундер HR-экосистемы Сёрч @search_hragency Кирилл Абросимов и автор карьерного канала Ханти @hunty_jobs Анфиса Ефимова. Немного о спикерах…

❤15🔥14👍12

21 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC487 views20 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

В нашем канале с вакансиями — свежий дроп! Подписывайтесь, чтобы не пропускать классные предложения 🤩

❤7👍7🔥6

21 Jul 2026, 10:23 UTC583 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @career_flowPhoto

Ищем менеджера по маркетингу и главбуха 🤩 В «ОЛОВО» — московский нишевый бренд одежды. Будет зп выше рынка, гибрид с офисом на Арбате и общение с основателями напрямую — никаких «согласовать в отделе согласований». Менеджер по маркетингу — если у тебя есть опыт продвижения брендов в fashion / ритейле, ты умеешь работать на результат и знаешь, как забустить онлайн-продажи — откликайся тут. Главный бухгалтер — если …

👍8❤7🔥6

13 Jul 2026, 15:21 UTC539 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Рекрутеры УМОЛЯЛИ не раскрывать этот секрет Кандидаты присылают резюме сутками: оказалось, надо каждый день на ночь... развивать HR-бренд 🤩 Представьте две компании с одинаковыми условиями. Про первую в интернете почти ничего нет. У второй — понятный карьерный лендинг и вайбовые соцсети. Ещё вы пару раз видели их кейсы в каналах про диджитал, а на афише вашего любимого феста точно было их лого. Куда отправите резюм…

❤9👍7🔥7

10 Jul 2026, 14:29 UTC432 views24 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сделайте первый шаг сегодня — с нами вам это под силу 🤩

❤10👍7💯6💘1

9 Jul 2026, 06:26 UTC489 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему Сёрч больше не HR-агентство Мы работали с десятками компаний, изучали запросы руководителей и анализировали кейсы. Вот что мы поняли: К HR-функции и её развитию нужно подходить комплексно. Поэтому мы собрали команду топовых спецов и создали экосистему — объединили в ней рекрутинг, HR-маркетинг, консалтинг, исследования и AI-инструменты. Наши специалисты решают все задачи бизнеса, связанные с человеческим ре…

❤7👍7🔥6💘1

6 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC413 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Псс, тут работу дают 🤩 Мы запустили карьерное медиа для специалистов из digital, tech и креативной индустрии, чтобы собрать в одном месте самые топовые вакансии, инсайты рынка, карьерные советы и мемы про поиск работы. Залетайте — вдруг кто-то ищет именно вас: @career_flow

🔥8❤7👍6💘1

4 Jul 2026, 13:10 UTC389 views29 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

327 новых откликов на вашу вакансию 🤩 Видите такое уведомление, открываете ноутбук, а отклики уже разобраны — и лучшие кандидаты ждут вашего звонка. Никаких часов работы вручную и риска потерять лучших спецов. Мы уверены: рекрутер должен заниматься тем, где действительно нужен человек — оценивать кандидатов, вести переговоры и принимать решения. Всё остальное технологии могут взять на себя. Именно поэтому AI-рекру…

🔥11❤7👍6💘2👎1🗿1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @search_hragency. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сёрч • Digital HR” (@search_hragency), 606 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/search_hragency.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.