Channel
@secretshopask
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,170subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002688812283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @secretshopask |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/secretshopask |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 1,170 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 1,169 | -3 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 1,172 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,179 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 1,186 | -6 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 1,192 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 1,194 | -6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:15 | 1,200 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 1,201 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
245 reactions across 15 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 64 | 26.1% | |
| ❤ | 47 | 19.2% | |
| 🤣 | 39 | 15.9% | |
| 👀 | 36 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5258358117242007937 | 15 | 6.12% | |
| ❤🔥 | 10 | 4.08% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 2.86% | |
| 🙉 | 7 | 2.86% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 2.45% | |
| 🎉 | 5 | 2.04% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 1.22% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 0.816% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.408% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
А мы будем обсуждать тот факт, что рэпер Дрейк гавкал по команде девушки-альтушки? 😏 p.s. нам тоже пришлось гуглить (Альтушка — это сленговое слово из интернета. Так зовут молодую девушку из альтернативной субкультуры (от слова «альт»). Они носят темную или яркую одежду, красят волосы в необычные цвета и делают заметный макияж) В чем суть - Дрейк принял участие в дейтинг эксперименте, где хотел выбрать себе жену. Из…
🤣8👀5🔥3❤1
Блин, недоговорила! Имеет место быть, пробуйте, почему бы и нет 🔫
🔥7❤3🍓2
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 52583581172420079376❤5❤🔥4🤣4
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥7❤🔥6🥰3
С праздником, дамы 🍵 Дорогие мужчины, не забывайте поздравлять своих женщин! Не только словами, а делом.
🔥8❤6🎉5
Сегодня работаем до 22:00 🕙 Подготовьтесь к крутым выходным, друзья !!! Долой рутину 😁
🔥5🍓4👀3
А так что-ли можно было? 😐 Если кто-нибудь хочет получить пощечину, приносите в бутик брендовые пакетики (с содержимым, конечно), мы всё устроим 😁 p.s. Татьяна @palamarism , мы вас так на сессиях представляем, только такие подношения ахахах
🔥6❤4🤣3
Появилось время написать обещанную историю про поход по злачным местам города и кринж «предложение» 🥰 Запомните ручку от сумки на фотках выше, это важно. Пятница - город засыпает и просыпается мафия в виде «заскучавших декретных подружек», которые решили исследовать культурные места города 🍗🍗🍗 Если честно, я до сих пор не понимаю, узнал ли меня ( со стороны бутика-блога-просвета 18+) человек , речь о котором пойдет …
🤣13❤5👀4
Обожаем обратную связь от вас! Спасибо, что делитесь 🥰 Кстати, у нас есть несколько подписчиков, которые тестят продукцию, которая не представлена у нас в бутике и была где-то приобретена, и отправляют нам свое впечатление/отзыв. Такие отзывы мы не публикуем на канале, так как мы не можем быть уверены в оригинальности этих продуктов = не факт, что оно вообще так или иначе работает и дает какой-либо эффект. Плюс, вы …
🔥8❤5custom 52583581172420079372
Ой, не могу 😂😂😂 Практика от сексолога к которой можно придти самому ахахх автор : lihoimaks
🤣7❤4💯4
Девочки мои любимые мои хорошие, снова в наличии пробочки силиконовые с вибрацией! Со всеми, с кем вели беседу по поводу анального секса и комфорта - это они самые. Пока действительно самые практичные, аккуратные и нежные игрушечки с которыми анальные забавы становятся не пыткой, а удовольствием ахах
❤5custom 52583581172420079374😍3👀1
Добрый день подписчики и любимые клиенты 💖 Погодка совсем не радует, но радуем мы поставками 🎹 В последнее время поступали запросы на необычные формы и вообще что-нибудь такое приколдесное)) Показываем лишь часть ахахах
👀5🔥5custom 52583581172420079373🍌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @secretshopask. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Секретный бутик 18+” (@secretshopask), 1,170 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secretshopask.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.