Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сейчас Объясню

Channel

Сейчас Объясню

@seichasobyasnu

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,132subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002021750479
TypeChannel
Username@seichasobyasnu
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seichasobyasnu

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,1301,1461,1387 August 2026 — 1,146 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,144 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,144 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,142 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,140 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,138 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,137 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,131 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,130 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,136 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,135 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,132 subscribers1,1327 August 202619 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,128–1,148 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:361,132-3
14 Sept 2026, 22:591,135-1
11 Sept 2026, 07:211,136+6
6 Sept 2026, 14:001,130-1
30 Aug 2026, 11:351,131-6
27 Aug 2026, 17:371,137-1
20 Aug 2026, 21:051,138-2
14 Aug 2026, 22:281,140-2
11 Aug 2026, 07:211,142-2
7 Aug 2026, 23:471,144no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:001,144-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:531,146first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

138 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4532.6%
❤‍🔥2316.7%
custom 52198345154547101512215.9%
🔥1813.0%
💘107.25%
custom 586189601412166794985.80%
😍64.35%
😱64.35%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 138 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seichasobyasnu. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC49 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

СПИДРАН ПО КИЕВСКОЙ РУСИ 🇷🇺 В прямом эфире смотрим, как наш коллега Павел поясняет князьям за отчины. Ещё немного – и междоусобицы официально будут отменены ⚔️ 👲ПОСМОТРЕТЬ ВИДЕО👲 #Сейчас_Объясню

5❤‍🔥1custom 52198345154547101511

6 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC81 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЧЕЛОВЕК, КОТОРЫЙ ПРОЖИЛ В АЭРОПОРТУ 18 ЛЕТ ✈️🧳 Париж, 1988 год. Иранец Мехран Карими Нассери оказался в аэропорту Шарль-де-Голль без документов, подтверждающих его личность и статус беженца. Франция не могла разрешить ему въезд, но и отправить в другую страну было невозможно. Так обычная пересадка растянулась почти на два десятилетия. Нассери поселился в терминале № 1. Спал на красной скамейке, мылся в служебных по

😱63❤‍🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC93 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ЛУКСМАКСЕРЫ СРЕДИ РОССИЙСКИХ ПРАВИТЕЛЕЙ💅 👑 Александр I — натуральный луксмаксер Современники считали его одним из самых красивых монархов Европы. Обладал идеальными чертами лица, отличной осанкой и харизмой. Получил генетическую лотерею среди Романовых. 🧔 Пётр I — хардмаксер Создатель луксмаксеров тех времен. Побрил боярам бороды, ввёл европейскую одежду и заставил всех менять имидж. Если нельзя улучшить себя — улу

🔥73💘3

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC102 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто же это?

  1. Мария Склодовская-Кюри91%
  2. Дмитрий Менделеев6%
  3. Альберт Эйнштейн3%
  4. Нильс Бор0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTC101 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵️‍♂️ ВИКТОРИНА: УГАДАЙ ПО 5 ФАКТАМ Сейчас будет 5 намёков на одного исторического человека. Открывай факты — и проверим, на каком ты поймёшь, кто это 😏 Факт 1: В юности она не могла получить высшее образование в родной Варшаве, потому что женщин туда не принимали. Чтобы учиться, она посещала подпольный «Летучий университет», который постоянно менял место встреч, скрываясь от царской охранки. Факт 2: Именно она п

custom 52198345154547101514❤‍🔥1🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 09:47 UTC119 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

АННА ИОАННОВНА ОТМЕТИЛ(-А) ВАС В ПУБЛИКАЦИИ💅 Кажется нишевый контент XVIII века не заканчивается 😁 Анна Иоанновна — императрица, которая обожала пышные праздники, необычные развлечения и зрелища такого масштаба, что о них потом рассказывали по всей Европе. При её дворе постоянно проходили маскарады, выступления шутов, охоты и всевозможные придворные шоу. Если бы Анна вела блог сегодня, подписчики бы никогда не знали

6❤‍🔥4custom 52198345154547101512

2 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC134 views12 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

БЕЖЕВЫЙ «ФОЛЬКСВАГЕН»: СМЕРТЬ ВЫХОДНОГО ДНЯ🔪 Привет. Я — Тед Банди. Днём я был студентом юридического факультета, работал в телефоне доверия для жертв насилия и писал речи для губернатора. А по вечерам я искал жертв — часто это были темноволосые студентки с пробором посередине. Я подходил к ним, притворяясь травмированным: на костылях или с перевязанной рукой. Просил помочь донести вещи до машины. Они видели мою об

custom 586189601412166794982🔥2

1 Aug 2026, 11:34 UTC146 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У СМЕШАРИКОВ ЕСТЬ СВОЯ МУЛЬТИВСЕЛЕННАЯ?😑 Да! Причём Смешарики так прочно вошли в нашу жизнь, что целое поколение буквально выросло вместе с ними. Каждая ступень нашего взросления сопровождалась новым и уникальным проектом от студии «Петербург», где мы узнавали новое из мира биологии, физики и даже экономики! Но как им удалось провести тебя с пелёнок до подросткового возраста — читай в нашем новом лонгриде!

❤‍🔥10custom 52198345154547101518💘75

30 Jul 2026, 12:19 UTC160 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

ПЕРВЫЕ НА ВЕРШИНЕ МИРА 🏔 29 мая 1953 года. Высота — 8848,86 метра. Воздух содержит лишь треть привычного количества кислорода, температура опускается почти до −30 °C, а ветер сбивает с ног. Именно здесь двое людей навсегда изменили историю альпинизма. Эдмунд Хиллари и Тенцинг Норгей стали первыми, кто достиг вершины Эверест. До них десятки экспедиций терпели неудачу, а многие считали, что человек просто не способен

7😍4🔥2custom 52198345154547101511

29 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC137 viewsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Кто же это?

  1. Валиде Султан7%
  2. Кёсем Султан7%
  3. Хасеки Хюррем Султан79%
  4. Михримак Султан7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 12:02 UTC149 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🕵️‍♂️ ВИКТОРИНА: УГАДАЙ ПО 5 ФАКТАМ Сейчас будет 5 намёков на одного исторического человека. Открывай факты — и проверим, на какой ты поймёшь, кто это 😏 Факт 1: Она вошла в историю, став матерью султана Селима II и навсегда изменив законы престолонаследия в Османской империи. Факт 2: Её имя в переводе с персидского означает «Весёлая» или «Та, что дарит радость». Этим именем нарек ее султан Сулейман. Факт 3: Она

custom 521983451545471015141❤‍🔥1

29 Jul 2026, 11:53 UTC125 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

КАК ЖЕ НА САМОМ ДЕЛЕ УЧИЛИСЬ ЗНАМЕНИТЫЕ ЛИЧНОСТИ? 🤔 Уинстон Черчилль — завалил экзамен?💼 Дважды не смог поступить в Сандхерст с первого раза — особенно проваливал математику. В итоге прошёл только с третьей попытки. Позже шутил, что «армия — это единственное место, куда я попал не с первой попытки». Альберт Энштейн — двоечник?🧪 Один из распространенных мифов, что Альберт Эйнштейн был двоечником в школе. Однако он х

4🔥2😍2custom 52198345154547101511

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @seichasobyasnu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 12:19 UTCAnonymous Quiz34 voters

Кто же это?

  1. Мария Склодовская-Кюри91%
  2. Дмитрий Менделеев6%
  3. Альберт Эйнштейн3%
  4. Нильс Бор0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTCAnonymous Quiz28 voters

Кто же это?

  1. Валиде Султан7%
  2. Кёсем Султан7%
  3. Хасеки Хюррем Султан79%
  4. Михримак Султан7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ДВФУ
@fefudvfu · 22,381
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сейчас Объясню” (@seichasobyasnu), 1,132 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seichasobyasnu.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.