Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Максим Котёнков: SEO и AI-автоматизация

Channel

Максим Котёнков: SEO и AI-автоматизация

@seokotenkov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,293subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001330381336
TypeChannel
Username@seokotenkov
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seokotenkov

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,2677,2937,2807 August 2026 — 7,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,273 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,275 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,269 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,272 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,267 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,269 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,270 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,281 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,283 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,288 subscribers9 September 2026 — 7,285 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,287 subscribers17 September 2026 — 7,293 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,263–7,297 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:407,293+6
13 Sept 2026, 16:197,287+2
9 Sept 2026, 16:017,285-3
4 Sept 2026, 17:217,288+5
29 Aug 2026, 18:037,283+2
26 Aug 2026, 15:247,281+11
23 Aug 2026, 09:487,270+1
19 Aug 2026, 15:037,269+2
16 Aug 2026, 17:467,267-5
13 Aug 2026, 12:357,272+3
10 Aug 2026, 03:407,269-6
7 Aug 2026, 14:057,275+2
7 Aug 2026, 05:007,273no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:517,273first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

519 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥14628.1%
👍11722.5%
10319.8%
😁10219.7%
👎224.24%
🎉142.70%
custom 5825534997087391628101.93%
👨‍💻50.963%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC≈1,860 views57 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @closedchannelkotenkovVideo

Агент "GEO Монстр" — самый мясной агент, что выходил в школе Это полноценная рабочий GEO-фреймворк, который изучает бизнес, измеряет видимость в поиске и AI, формирует контент-план, создает материалы и отслеживает результат. Агент в цифрах 31 специализированный скилл 69 локальных Python-инструментов 27 пользовательских команд 14 аналитических экранов 10 этапов полного рабочего цикла 7 аналитических контуров: AEO, G

👍25🔥15😁9👎3custom 582553499708739162832

14 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC≈2,770 views104 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Большое видео по GEO- и AEO-продвижению без воздуханства, сущностей и разметок: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wBMAATs2Yc0 Это самое токсичное и практичное видео у меня на канале. Видео вышло пару часов назад, а кто-то уже попытался накрутить дизлайки. Кого я задену этим видео: ▪️ Воздуханов, продающих GEO за 120к с набором работ на один день работы джуна. ▪️ GEO-экспертов, которые в качестве источников для матери

45🔥31😁12custom 58255349970873916287👍5👎3🎉1

10 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC≈2,630 views19 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Еще немного на подумать на счет индекса ChatGPT Я провел небольшой эксперимент, где: 1. Закрыл от LLM ботов (на уровне IP) и всех поисковых систем кроме Яндекс и Google сайт ResultUP 2. Переименовал один из разделов из "blog" в "articles" 3. Отправил 6 статей на индексацию в Google (те что на фото) 4. Подождал их индексации 5. Открыл сайт для Chatgpt ботов 6. Сделал запрос в ChatGPT web-поиск url адресов с сайта на

😁10🔥4👍3🎉2

10 Jul 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,290 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

По опросу уже примерно понятна общая картина. Мой вывод простой: Codex сейчас реально хорош. Он уже нормально конкурирует с Claude Code, а в некоторых задачах даже его обходит. Весь июнь я параллельно использовал и Codex, и Claude Code для разных задач. По моим ощущениям, Claude заметно лучше в генерации контента и фронтенде. Особенно в дизайне — там разница действительно ощутимая, и для многих это может быть решаю

🔥19😁95👎3🎉2👍1👨‍💻1

10 Jul 2026, 08:22 UTC≈2,360 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

8 причин попробовать Codex вместо Claude Code Я сам немного поучаствовал в хайпе вокруг Claude Code. Но Codex очень хорошо обновился, и последние два с половиной месяца использую теперь только его для своих задач. А сегодня еще вышла новая линейка моделей 5.6. Вот причины: 1. По ощущениям он точнее, совершает меньше ошибок. 2. Лимитами можно обмазываться, их постоянно сбрасывают. Ультра-режим на высокой скорости во

😁16🎉6👎5

30 Jun 2026, 12:24 UTC≈3,060 views26 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Упс, кажется кто-то спалился 🤭 Немного для общей образованности. Когда ChatGPT нужно найти что-то на конкретном сайте в поиске, то он может делать запрос вида "site:site.ru запрос". И по всей видимости эти запросы могут направляться в Google. Ставлю небольшой эксперимент. Потом покажу результаты, пока идет как и задумывалось.

😁21👍5

30 Jun 2026, 08:17 UTC≈3,060 views24 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Доброе утро, GEO-шники! Графики на подумать. На них показана вероятность попадания доменов и их URL в слои цитирования и поиска ChatGPT по коммерческим запросам на 5 языках и в 5 странах — в зависимости от их позиции в Google, если домен или URL встретились по одному и тому же запросу в Google и ChatGPT в том же GEO и на том же языке. Выборка — пара тысяч промптов. Плюс перепроверено ещё на выборке из 3 тыс. промпто

16🔥5👍3

24 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC≈3,350 views27 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я собрал 15 000 промптов через парсинг интерфейса ChatGPT на русском и английском. Это 15 ГБ данных. Делюсь главными выводами. Надеюсь, для GEO-экспертов не секрет, что есть 2 слоя: ▪️ поиск кандидатов через веер уточняющих запросов ▪️ отбор доменов и URL-адресов для цитирования — дальше буду называть это цитированием Самая сильная метрика, по которой сайт попадает в цитирование, — это его изначальная позиция в сло

🔥175😁3👨‍💻2

11 Jun 2026, 11:52 UTC≈3,310 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Год назад были судебные слушания над Google, где выступали челы из OpenAI. Прямая цитата: «Наша цель — и это была очень амбициозная цель, к которой мы пока и близко не подошли, — обслуживать около 80% нашего трафика из нашего собственного first-party индекса. Мы считаем, что 100% в долгосрочной перспективе достижимо, но это настолько далеко и настолько неопределённо, что это нельзя превратить в операционную цель —

8👍2😁2

11 Jun 2026, 11:15 UTC≈2,550 views14 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Есть ли свой индекс у ChatGPT? Вообще не трогаем тему обучения моделей и ответ чисто из ее весов. Исключительно про поиск по базам URL. Почему ChatGPT, а не Claude или Перплексити? Потому что для 80% населения земли AI = ChatGPT. И у него несравненная доля рынка с другими системами. Что говорит о создании индекса: - Поведение ботов OpenAI часто похоже на краулеры, которые обходят страницы сайта. Мини-эксперимент

🔥8👍3😁3

22 May 2026, 12:10 UTC≈3,510 views0 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Есть ли у AI чатов (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) свои индексаторы? Типа как Google бот обходит интернет и индексирует сайты.

  1. Да, есть LLM индекс и индексаторы32%
  2. Скорее да30%
  3. Скорее нет19%
  4. Нет13%
  5. Ответы11%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seokotenkov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 May 2026, 12:10 UTCAnonymous Poll574 voters

Есть ли у AI чатов (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini) свои индексаторы? Типа как Google бот обходит интернет и индексирует сайты.

  1. Да, есть LLM индекс и индексаторы32%
  2. Скорее да30%
  3. Скорее нет19%
  4. Нет13%
  5. Ответы11%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 24 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

SEO HR, digital-вакансии, офис и удалёнка
@seohr · 24,935
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Максим Котёнков: SEO и AI-автоматизация” (@seokotenkov), 7,293 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seokotenkov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.