National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
24.6 average views per post against 8,164 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.301%. Across the 5,759 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,203–9,999 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.9%, with a median of 11.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
64 of 64 published in the window (64 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,573
Mature posts only
0.223% over 13 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 91 days, net -275. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,117–8,474 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 17:16
8,158
-6
2 Nov 2026, 23:36
8,164
-8
30 Oct 2026, 23:36
8,172
-10
27 Oct 2026, 19:01
8,182
-6
24 Oct 2026, 14:56
8,188
-7
22 Oct 2026, 00:46
8,195
-10
18 Oct 2026, 21:38
8,205
-12
15 Oct 2026, 22:06
8,217
-6
13 Oct 2026, 05:51
8,223
-24
6 Oct 2026, 15:59
8,247
-16
29 Sept 2026, 05:57
8,263
-27
19 Sept 2026, 11:22
8,290
-10
15 Sept 2026, 05:56
8,300
-8
11 Sept 2026, 14:20
8,308
-24
6 Sept 2026, 19:17
8,332
-18
2 Sept 2026, 05:44
8,350
-13
29 Aug 2026, 20:47
8,363
-11
26 Aug 2026, 15:14
8,374
-9
23 Aug 2026, 16:35
8,383
-8
19 Aug 2026, 21:35
8,391
first reading
Engagement
326 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.345%
avg views ÷ 8,158 subscribers
Avg views / post
28.2
78 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
78
of 326 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 78 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
326 (2 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
2,197
Reactions total
2
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 00:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈46,100
Videos
≈10,100
Links
≈43,300
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
1m 57s
Measured directly from 31 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3
42.9%
👍
2
28.6%
🔥
1
14.3%
🙏
1
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 326 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 326 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 78 posts held from the last 30 days (6.41%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
♨️ جنگ ایران، شکاف تازه میان ونس و حامیان اسرائیل
🔶️ جنک اویگور: واضح است که جنگ ایران باعث باخت آنها در انتخابات شد. ونس حقیقت واضح را گفت تا شغلش را حفظ کند، اما کاملاً درست است. طرفداران «اسرائیل اول» عصبانیاند چون میخواهند ما همچنان جنگ آنها را برایشان بجنگیم، بنابراین سعی میکنند ونس را به خاطر مخالفت با آنها نابود کنند.
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️واکنش کنشگران خارجی به نتایج انتخابات آمریکا
🔸بازتاب گسترده نتایج انتخابات میاندورهای آمریکا در میان چهرهها و تحلیلگران خارجی؛ از انتقاد به پیامدهای جنگ با ایران و سیاستهای ترامپ تا تأکید بر مخالفت رأیدهندگان آمریکایی با تداوم جنگ و مداخلات نظامی واشنگتن در خارج از مرزهای این کشور.
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️ اعتراف جنجالی ترامپ درباره پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا
🔶️ دونالد ترامپ اذعان کرد پس از شکست جمهوریخواهان در انتخابات میاندورهای، تماسهای متعددی درباره انتقاد از عملکرد پیت هگست، وزیر جنگ آمریکا، دریافت کرده است. به گزارش نیویورکپست، شماری از جمهوریخواهان خواستار برکناری هگست هستند و او را گزینهای برای مقصر دانستن شکست انتخاباتی میدانند؛ در همین حال، برخی کارشناسان نارضایتی افکار عمومی از جنگ آمریکا علیه ایر…
♨️ انتشار موارد جعلی با عنوان اعتصاب بخشهای مختلف، از سوی سکوهای معاند از جمله سکوهای مرتبط با تروریستهای کرد خارج از کشور
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️۱۳ آبان؛ از مداخله خارجی تا ایستادگی برای استقلال و حاکمیت ملی
🔶سیزدهم آبان در حافظه تاریخی معاصر ایران با سه رخداد مهم و تأثیرگذار گره خورده است: تبعید امام خمینی(ره) بهدنبال اعتراض به قانون کاپیتولاسیون در سال ۱۳۴۳، کشتار دانشآموزان و دانشجویان در سال ۱۳۵۷ و تسخیر سفارت آمریکا در سال ۱۳۵۸.
https://seraj24.ir/news-details/261228
#استکبار_جهانی
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️ماری ال ترامپ (برادرزاده دونالد ترامپ): ترامپ خودش را به رأی گذاشت
🔸دونالد ترامپ خودش را در معرض رأی مردم قرار داد و همین مسئله باعث شد ما با اکثریتی قاطع پیروز شویم. از توجه شما به این موضوع سپاسگزارم!
#سواد_سیاسی
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️ کارشناس عرب: نتیجه انتخابات کنگره ماحصل سیاستهای ترامپ است
🔶 «نمرود سلیمان» کارشناس و تحلیلگر سیاسی عرب در مصاحبه با شبکه العهد: آنچه در انتخابات ایالات متحده در حال وقوع است، پیامد طبیعی مواضع سیاسی ترامپ است. ترامپ مدعی بود که دوره دوم ریاستجمهوریاش دورانی همراه با صلح و بدون جنگ خواهد بود، اما به این وعده خود وفا نکرد.
#سواد_سیاسی
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️پایان افسانه شکست ناپذیری آمریکا
🔶شکستهای سیاسی در داخل آمریکا و ناکامی در تحمیل اراده به دیگر کشورها، تصویری متفاوت از قدرت واشنگتن به نمایش گذاشته است؛ تصویری که به باور رهبر معظم انقلاب، از افول سلطه آمریکا و فروپاشی افسانه شکستناپذیری این قدرت حکایت دارد.
#افول_غرب
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️جنک اویگور: درخواست خروج آمریکا از ایران
🔸پیام این انتخابات روشن بود: جنگ بس است! هیچ بهانهای از سوی هیچیک از طرفین پذیرفتنی نیست؛ همین حالا از جنگ مربوط به ایران خارج شوید، نیروهایمان را به خانه بازگردانید و دیگر برای کشورهای دیگر نجنگید!
#ایران_مقتدر
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
♨️مارک کلی (سناتور آمریکایی): پیام انتخاباتی مردم به ترامپ
🔸مردم آمریکا همین حالا با رأی خود دونالد ترامپ را استیضاح کردند.
#افول_غرب
🗞️ اندیشکده تحلیلی تبیینی سراج ۲۴
📍 @seraaj24
Showing the 12 most recent of 326 posts we hold for @seraaj24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @seraaj24 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
15 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سراج۲۴” (@seraaj24), 8,158 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seraaj24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.