От подписчика Скоро уже месяц будет, как спилили ветки. Убирать видать ни кто не собирается.
😁1

Channel
@serovdetka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,978subscribers
-84 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001072790763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @serovdetka |
| Created | Between 1 October 2016 and 31 July 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/serovdetka |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 10:38 | 16,978 | -4 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 10:57 | 16,982 | +4 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:00 | 16,978 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 16,979 | +5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:56 | 16,974 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:21 | 16,967 | -3 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:41 | 16,970 | +1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:54 | 16,969 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 16,976 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 16,982 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 16,984 | -5 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 16,989 | -4 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:59 | 16,993 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 16,997 | -4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:36 | 17,001 | -8 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:36 | 17,009 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:03 | 17,012 | -12 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:34 | 17,024 | +1 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 17,023 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 17,022 | first reading |
270 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 46 of 49 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 270 (7 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 78,451 |
| Reactions total | 941 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,328 reactions across 210 posts, in 40 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 614 | 18.4% | |
| 🤡 | 490 | 14.7% | |
| 🤮 | 239 | 7.18% | |
| 👍 | 234 | 7.03% | |
| 💩 | 181 | 5.44% | |
| 💯 | 162 | 4.87% | |
| 😁 | 146 | 4.39% | |
| 🖕 | 140 | 4.21% | |
| 🔥 | 128 | 3.85% | |
| 👏 | 119 | 3.58% | |
| 🤬 | 109 | 3.28% | |
| 😱 | 103 | 3.09% | |
| ❤🔥 | 98 | 2.94% | |
| 😍 | 83 | 2.49% | |
| 👎 | 70 | 2.10% | |
| 🤷♂ | 55 | 1.65% | |
| 🐳 | 46 | 1.38% | |
| 🙈 | 45 | 1.35% | |
| 🌚 | 39 | 1.17% | |
| 😭 | 29 | 0.871% | |
| 20 further kinds | 198 | 5.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 220 of the 270 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,328 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 270 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
От подписчика Скоро уже месяц будет, как спилили ветки. Убирать видать ни кто не собирается.
😁1
Тайна бензина на самой дорогой АЗС в Серове раскрыта? В соцсетях опубликовали информацию, что сын владельца сети АЗС Premium (в Серове она расположена у Магнит Экстра) опубликовал в своем аккаунте объявление о наборе людей, чтобы "набирать бензин" с АЗС. В комментариях уже предположили, что весь добытый таким образом бензин могут продавать в несколько раз дороже на сети АЗС Premium. А вы как считаете, для какой це…
😁9🌚3
От подписчика на первом разъезде замечены медведи
❤6
Сегодня четверг, 3 сентября 2026 года.
🎉8😍2
От подписчика Большая просьба откликнуться очевидцев ДТП, которое произошло 25.08.2026, в 17.10 на перекрёстке ул.Зеленая - ул. Ф. Революции (начальная школа #14). Позвонить по тел. 8(952)134-03-95.
От подписчика : 14 школа, вроде и ворота есть, и рабочие есть в штате школы. Но лопаты видать нету у них. Соберёмся поможем?
От подписчика Никого не парит, что рядом с вокзалом, с ж-д переездом такой костёр из сухих дров лежит? А если это дело начнёт дымить? Все пожарные бригады города вместе взятые не справятся. Может быть МЧС Свердловской области и https://vk.ru/sverdlovskprok возмут под контроль этот бардак?
🔥9💯4😱1
От подписчика Сегодня на заправке ул. Карбышева, оплатила бензин по 120 руб. пистолет отщелкнул видимо, не заправившись отъехала, вернулась, мой бенз заправил парень грунта белая, таксует. Подошла объяснила, попросила перевести деньги потом за мой бензин, он снял в машину, кому то все писал. Потом уехал... Я понимаю, с бензом напряг, но такой поступок🫎. Надеюсь тебе пригодятся эти 4 литра
😁26🤡6🌚2🔥2🤬1
От подписчика Хочу рассказать, что сегодня приключилось с моим отцом. Цитирую его рассказ.Сегодня, 1го сентября, ходил на наш пруд, был со стороны лыжной базы, пока сидел у воды видел наверху ребят, катались на роликах, но вдруг сверху слева вылез медведь и направился прямо на меня, сзади вода, впереди медведь, дети недалеко, что делать. Главное не паниковать, тем более это была уже моя вторая встреча с косолапым. …
😱30❤6🤡4😁4🤯3
По Красноармейской от Братской до Кузьмина будь-то лыжню проложили. Вроде недавно был ремонт дороги. Скоро начнется гололед, думаю будет небезопасно ездить.
🤬8🙈2
От подписчика: Не понимаю людей, которые жалуются на высокие цены на частных АЗС. Дорого для вас - не покупайте. Не буду объяснять, что мелким АЗС топливо достается заметно дороже, чем сетям (это как Магнит и Дискаунт - в первом цены в большинстве случаев будут ниже тупо из-за объемов). Но главное, каждый сам оценивает стоимость часа своей жизни. На ГПН литр 95 стоит 68 руб, на частной, предположим, 160 руб. Разница…
👍17🤡14❤🔥3🔥2🖕1
Доброе утро, Серов
❤16👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 270 posts we hold for @serovdetka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какая проблема для тебя самая острая?
The shares total 316%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 270 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Это Серов, детка🤟🏻” (@serovdetka), 16,978 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/serovdetka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.