Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ··• Серёжа печатает

Channel

··• Серёжа печатает

@seryozha_typing

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,370subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001457657332
TypeChannel
Username@seryozha_typing
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/seryozha_typing

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,3702,3822,3767 August 2026 — 2,374 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,376 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,377 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,378 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,382 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,374 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,376 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,378 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,374 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,379 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,375 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,370 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,368–2,384 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 16:202,370-5
11 Sept 2026, 18:552,375-4
7 Sept 2026, 06:412,379+5
2 Sept 2026, 19:072,374-4
30 Aug 2026, 09:272,378+2
24 Aug 2026, 00:442,376+2
20 Aug 2026, 08:142,374-8
17 Aug 2026, 16:352,382+4
14 Aug 2026, 02:152,378+1
10 Aug 2026, 09:562,377+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:352,376+2
7 Aug 2026, 01:022,374first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

234 reactions across 21 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁12252.1%
5021.4%
🔥2510.7%
💩93.85%
😱93.85%
👍83.42%
❤‍🔥31.28%
🥰31.28%
👀20.855%
👏20.855%
🤩10.427%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 234 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:31 UTC231 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁11

Signed Серёжа

7 Aug 2026, 05:08 UTC298 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Закончили первый AI-интенсив и собрали обратную связь. Мы взяли 22 человека! До конца дошли 10, проект сделали 6 человек. За месяц. Ребята воткнули нам 8 из 10, что неплохо. Что делали? Один участник развивал промышленное ПО для управления автоматом расстановки компонентов на печатные платы: камеры, OpenCV, микросервисная архитектура, калибровки, планировщик движений и веб-интерфейс оператора. Другой сделал мод-

🔥85

Signed Серёжа

6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC348 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/ivan_plastun_channel/24 Хорошая мысль, кстати. Причём это частая ошибка руководителя и команды в целом. Психологически нам легко, когда уютно. Мы можем не обращать внимание на то, что мы застоялись, в тот момент, когда нам кажется, что вокруг всё круто. Именно поэтому надо стараться выходить из зоны комфорта и стараться трезво оценивать ситуацию и результаты. А также челенджить самих себя и команду. Н

👍2

Signed Серёжа

6 Aug 2026, 08:10 UTC418 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сделал вам мем

😁10💩2

Signed Серёжа

6 Aug 2026, 05:20 UTC431 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Недавно проходил Yandex AI Studio Series — это серия образовательных лекций по ИИ. Там было много про инфру AI Studio, очевидно, но было и очень много теоретической информации, кторая максимально универсальна. Я смотрел и делал конспекты. А сейчас собрал всё в одно место с расшифровками, скринами презентаций. Вышло довольно комапактно, но полезно. Пользуйтесь https://popovs.tech/blog/yandex-ai-studio-series

6

Signed Серёжа

4 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC489 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Борис ночью пофиксил образ на brew, теперь его можно ставить и обновлять одной командой. И я добавил поддержку OpenCode, по просьбе чата. Теперь он считает и его тоже. https://github.com/tsergeytovarov/ai-stats

👍1🔥1

Signed Серёжа

3 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC553 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Наблюдение. ChatGPT неплохо раскладывает таро и нотальную карту.

😁16

Signed Серёжа

3 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC568 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче, вот это реально тема. Я прям вчера тестировал много, и оно работает. Сильно быстрее и экономнее, чем до этого. Тут сошлось пару факторов. 1. Переход исключительно на риск-тест. То есть он покрывает тестами не все 100% строк кода, а только там, где есть риски. 2. В конце той недели OpenAI сами пофиксили страсть к оверинженирингу и прожорливость. Как итог — за 2 дня почти неприрывной работы по 3 проектам 30

👀2

Signed Серёжа

2 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC580 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А ещё сеттинги я тоже обновил и починил. Это которые про базове настройки. Зачем? Агенты совсем стали умными, и все прошлые штуки загоняют их в бесконечные циклы, слишком много тестов и ревью. Я вычистил это и на уровне глобальных настроек и на уровне того, как оно работает с superpowers. у меня стало прям заметно шустрее https://github.com/tsergeytovarov/ai-settings

🔥31💩1

Signed Серёжа

2 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC531 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

у меня кстати день обновлений) в Burn приехало обновление, которое теперь все лимиты показывает в риалтайме ну и там много мелких улучшений, по скорости, производительности и вот это всё.

👍3

Signed Серёжа

2 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC531 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короче я вчера ездил проводить два воркшопа по ИИ для ребят. Вывода 3. 1. Как всегда сложнее всего нащупать стартовый средний уровень, что у всех начало быстро получаться что-то делать. 2. Смотреть как у ребят начинает что-то получаться за полтора часа — бесценно. 3. Я слишком стар для того, чтобы вести два воркшопа в один день. Вывод три самый важный я думаю)

😁14❤‍🔥3

Signed Серёжа

31 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTC583 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Так, чтиво на выходные. Я обещал написать материал про фронтенд, но пока писал, понял что оно все выглядит так сложно, что никто не будет это делать. Но на самом деле — не всё сложно. Более того, достаточно сделать один раз в проекте и дальше наслаждаться. Так получился материал. Я выложил его на VC. И я выложил его в свой блог. https://vc.ru/ai/3054786-kak-sdelat-sovremennyj-frontend-bez-neiroslopa https://popovs

8

Signed Серёжа

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @seryozha_typing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“··• Серёжа печатает” (@seryozha_typing), 2,370 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seryozha_typing.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.