Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for seva ✶

Channel

seva ✶

@sevalium

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

109subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002660310878
TypeChannel
Username@sevalium
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sevalium

Growth

107114110.59 August 2026 — 114 subscribers9 August 2026 — 114 subscribers17 August 2026 — 113 subscribers25 August 2026 — 114 subscribers1 September 2026 — 107 subscribers10 September 2026 — 109 subscribers1099 August 202610 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 32 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 106–115 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 11:58109+2
1 Sept 2026, 12:54107-7
25 Aug 2026, 03:23114+1
17 Aug 2026, 19:06113-1
9 Aug 2026, 15:30114no change
9 Aug 2026, 15:17114first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 17 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

442 reactions across 16 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.95% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5791949920495734888449.95%
custom 5395610815162261716409.05%
custom 5794392176339193513409.05%
🔥388.60%
🙏306.79%
custom 5420237466147791924255.66%
🎉235.20%
custom 5357511556143794946204.52%
custom 5393386421534908488204.52%
custom 5420594223311266061204.52%
custom 5397711844443987558194.30%
💊194.30%
custom 5195120599323676237132.94%
custom 5188215460142795049122.71%
🎃122.71%
custom 5792010427995000636112.49%
custom 5230937727469375283102.26%
custom 537733619317422081081.81%
custom 532147240825364568971.58%
custom 579182683961793332571.58%
10 further kinds245.43%

Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 442 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2025 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 19:20 UTC45 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Да

custom 53956108151622617168custom 54202374661477919247custom 54205942233112660616🔥3🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 16:09 UTC53 views22 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Нет

custom 53956108151622617169custom 54202374661477919248custom 54205942233112660615

1 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC85 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🫪🫪

🔥14🙏10custom 54205942233112660618

29 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC194 views32 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🔥12custom 53956108151622617169custom 54202374661477919248🙏2custom 54205942233112660611

28 Jul 2026, 19:23 UTC105 views26 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

павел дуров добавил возможность прикреплять музыку к постам ток за тг прем ну что ж пошел ты нахуй паша дуров

🙏16🔥8custom 54202374661477919242

25 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC261 views31 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 539338642153490848811custom 539561081516226171610custom 53977118444439875589🙏1

20 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC181 views23 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

мне нечего сказать

custom 539771184444398755810custom 53933864215349084889custom 53956108151622617164

12 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC216 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026

пиздец комментарии пропали лан похуй

custom 53773361931742208108

11 Jul 2026, 17:46 UTC404 views38 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

👎👎👎👎👎 #Lotf

custom 579194992049573488822custom 57943921763391935139custom 57920104279950006365custom 57917153809216346992

3 Jul 2026, 14:12 UTC663 views37 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 эт полный факап я хз как подогнать вкей фишки в свой стиль, еще я старалась оставить узнаваемость чуваков ну вы поняли #It

🎉18custom 57943921763391935138custom 57918268396179333253custom 57919499204957348883custom 57916525927947342942custom 57920104279950006362custom 57916346913710450581

29 Jun 2026, 16:55 UTC248 views25 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

первый пшол #Lotf

🎃12custom 57919499204957348887🎉5custom 57916525927947342941

11 Jun 2026, 23:42 UTC239 views28 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

вилка байерс скэч

custom 579439217633919351314custom 57919499204957348888custom 57920104279950006363custom 57918268396179333252custom 57916525927947342941

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sevalium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“seva ✶” (@sevalium), 109 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevalium.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.