Channel
@sevda_macani1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
332subscribers
-25 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001818237019 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sevda_macani1 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sevda_macani1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 22:21 | 332 | -4 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 08:39 | 336 | -13 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:28 | 349 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 353 | -4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 357 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 357 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 💔 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
خب سلامی بعد از یک سال و نیم دوسال؟ من نه هیترم نه آدمی هستم که بخوام شایعه پراکنی کنم یک سال و نیم دوساله که هیچ فعالیتی ندارم هر آدمی که تو پیج منه از فالورای قدیمی منه خوب هم میدونن دنبال ویو استوری و اهل دروغ گفتن و گنده صحبت کردن هم نیستم ماکان بند نه فن پیج امیر بودم نه رهام فن پیج ماکان بند بودم بعد از این همه مدت اومدم توی پیجم و هیچ حسی ندارم ببینین موقعی که ما فن پیج های قدیمی نمیگم ۱۰ سال ۷ سال ولی از همون…
❤3
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
یه صحبتی از طرف خودم میزارم اینجا بمونه که توی پیجمم که یک سال و نیم دوساله فعالیتی ندارم و پست پایان نذاشتم استوری گذاشتم که دیگه برای همیشه پیجم هم تموم شد امشب 🫂❤️
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
چونکه واقعا برای ما جدا نشدنی هستن
❤2
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
حتی نمتونم اسمشونو جدا کنم بگم امیر یا رهام
💔2
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
صد در صد شماهم برای من همینطورین😘❤️
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
ولی از حق نگذریم روزای خوب و بدی داشتیم ولی حتی روزای بدشم قشنگ بود چون پشت هم بودیم رهامیرم پشت ما میومدن تاییدمون میکردن روزای خوبشم که تک تکشون جای خود داره ماکان خیلی وقت دیگه سابق نیست معلوم نیست از کی تحت فشارن ما نمیدونیم چی گذشته از رفتن یاشار.امیر میلاد کسی دلیلشو نمیدونه قرارم نیست بفهمیم ولی اینو میدونم بی دلیل نیست اگه ماکان بود کنار هم ادامه میدیم شاید خیلی وقت تو پیجم فعالیتی ندارم ولی مثل همیشه هست…
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
مطمئن باش همینطوره 🫂
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
شکست عشقی نمدونم تا حالا اصلا کسی تو زندگیمم نبوده ولی مطمئنن انقد سرش اذیت نمیشدم
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
امیر و رهام کنار هم واقعا قشنگ بودن ولی ما نباید اینقدر اذیت میشدیم تهش اون چیزی که میخواستیم نمیشد همیشه خواسته خودشون بود
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
ما ماکانیا دیگه هیچوقت آدم سابق نمیشیم🫠
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
به این فکر کنین دوستای خیلی خوبی پیدا کردین ولی این اتفاق زمانی افتاده که موزیک سولو هاشون بیشتر از اون چیزی شد که نباید میشد و کسی قبول نمیکرد
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
واقعا قلبمون داره تیکه تیکه میشه 😭
Signed 𝐒𝐞𝐯𝐝𝐚🤍
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sevda_macani1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“•ᴀᴍᴀʀɪꜱ•” (@sevda_macani1), 332 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevda_macani1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.