Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -40. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,935–3,988 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 00:58
3,941
-7
12 Sept 2026, 13:39
3,948
-2
8 Sept 2026, 19:41
3,950
-4
28 Aug 2026, 18:56
3,954
-4
26 Aug 2026, 01:53
3,958
-6
23 Aug 2026, 11:58
3,964
-2
19 Aug 2026, 18:32
3,966
-6
16 Aug 2026, 14:22
3,972
-5
12 Aug 2026, 14:45
3,977
-2
9 Aug 2026, 09:12
3,979
-3
6 Aug 2026, 11:00
3,982
+1
6 Aug 2026, 04:20
3,981
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:26
3,981
first reading
Engagement
22 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1,141 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
438
38.4%
🙏
266
23.3%
🔥
146
12.8%
🥰
83
7.27%
👍
66
5.78%
🤯
57
5.00%
🤩
36
3.16%
😢
27
2.37%
👏
12
1.05%
🎉
5
0.438%
😱
4
0.351%
🦄
1
0.088%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sevenandmedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Друзья, накануне своего дня рождения традиционно прошу всех, кто хочет меня поздравить, поддержать одно из главных дел моей жизни – журнал «Фома».
В этом году ему исполняется 30 лет. Он начинался как черно-белый альманах, а сегодня стал большим медиапроектом, благодаря которому о Христе и Евангелии слышат и читают более 15 миллионов человек. «Фома» сегодня везде: на всех цифровых площадках, во всех форматах. В ответ…
Физика звука на примере бабаха.
Мы с Данькой на даче. Когда утром грохнуло я как раз подходила к двери кухне и в ней задрожали стёкла. Даня в это время говорил по телефону с прабабушкой, которая в Москве, в районе метро Зюзино.
Примерно через минуту, набираю Артёма (он на подстанции в центре). Только успеваю сказать про знатный бабах, Как Тёма сообщает «ой, бл….». В это же примерно время хлопок у бабушки.
То есть з…
Российские синхронистки выиграли третье золото на чемпионате Европы.
Спортсменки выдали роскошный перформанс с программой "Бешеные куклы" и получили от судей высочайшие 244,8221 балла.
🔹 Подписаться на РИА Новости
История для остросюжетного фильма.
Пропавший несколько дней назад в Иркутской области самолет найден тайге. Выжившие летчик и командир вышли на связь со спасателями по самодельной радиостанции.
Два дня они провели в лесу без связи, пытаясь передать информацию о своём местоположении и сообщить о случившемся. В итоге им удалось забраться на сопку. Они собрали (из чего?!) радиостанцию и. передали свои координаты.
Не удержалась и спапарацила! Ну какой же восторг. Девчонки загорелые, воспитанные, не зажатые при этом, в стильных платьях и шляпках.
Про них невозможно сказать, что они «приютские». Благополучные семейные дети.
Храни Бог сестёр, матушку - игуменью и благотворителей.
Совершено покушение на автора "Повернутых на войне", одного из создателей дрона "Упырь" Владимира Ткачука.
Подорвали его машину в Екатеринбурге. Водитель погиб на месте, Владимира увезла скорая.
Противник бьет по ключевым людям. Заслуги Владимира за годы СВО - огромные.
Прошу всех за него молиться.
Что сейчас расскажу! Я тут писала, что в отеле группа девочек с молодыми монашками (монашки почти в мирском, платочки, легкая длинная одежда, но я их сразу вычисляю). И думала, что это типа католического «Каритаса», потому что кто ещё может позволить себе отправить группу сирот в дорогой отель в пик сезона.
В общем, сёстры эти наши, православные, из Переславской епархии, дорогого владыченьки Феоктиста (у которого, кс…
❤83🙏23🔥9🤩1
Signed Наталья Лосева
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @sevenandmedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sevenandmedia named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
РИТА ЭБЗЕЕВА @mosmosru · 101,277 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
Что-то личное @chto_to_li4noe · 27,885 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 September 2026
Владимир Легойда @vladimirlegoyda · 33,905 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 3 September 2026
Православный психолог | Никита Сергеевич Яночкин @yanochkin_psiholog · 24,168 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
Ольга Кормухина @olgakormukhina · 25,780 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Татьянин день (издание)(ru.wikipedia.org) “…«одном из умнейших христианских изданий»{{cite web |author= |url=https://t.me/sevenandmedia/1483 |title=«Поздравляю одно из старейших…» |lang= |website=[[Telegram]]…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Наталья Лосева” (@sevenandmedia), 3,941 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sevenandmedia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.