Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
19 measurements spanning 36 days, net -427. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,012–5,710 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Sept 2026, 21:38
4,208
-163
12 Sept 2026, 19:21
4,371
-182
9 Sept 2026, 03:56
4,553
+54
3 Sept 2026, 19:20
4,499
-31
31 Aug 2026, 00:44
4,530
-164
28 Aug 2026, 07:26
4,694
-10
27 Aug 2026, 17:24
4,704
-140
25 Aug 2026, 02:04
4,844
-32
24 Aug 2026, 15:52
4,876
-391
21 Aug 2026, 13:08
5,267
-33
21 Aug 2026, 06:23
5,300
-204
18 Aug 2026, 14:23
5,504
-10
18 Aug 2026, 09:38
5,514
+368
15 Aug 2026, 20:14
5,146
-40
14 Aug 2026, 23:04
5,186
+278
13 Aug 2026, 15:31
4,908
+256
12 Aug 2026, 04:08
4,652
+17
11 Aug 2026, 17:30
4,635
no change
11 Aug 2026, 17:16
4,635
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,623 reactions across 9 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5395871399418044514
409
15.6%
custom 5444995933974601241
302
11.5%
custom 5431544491540523673
269
10.3%
custom 5377745374708536737
199
7.59%
custom 5400149878334598125
185
7.05%
custom 5368738342957523342
163
6.21%
custom 5445026106119857148
159
6.06%
custom 5447270475640119627
155
5.91%
custom 5445063704263566509
145
5.53%
custom 5467729487930105803
94
3.58%
custom 5395495448045722579
73
2.78%
custom 5366546664096050348
70
2.67%
custom 5368463825827829553
60
2.29%
custom 5296575234458039708
44
1.68%
custom 5368587181583542199
43
1.64%
custom 5399989757658832402
41
1.56%
custom 5467813089468523075
22
0.839%
custom 5397866248518281088
17
0.648%
custom 5296384099823428459
14
0.534%
custom 5404374837663669007
13
0.496%
17 further kinds
146
5.57%
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,623 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1,348
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 9 we hold a reading for · 56%
Most on one post
1,250
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sexwithxafi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 July 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵 🩵🩵🩵🩵
🤍🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵🩵
‧˚꒰Открыли бота с реферальной системой специально для вас!!
— Приглашаешь друзей, зарабатываешь звездочки и выводишь их совершенно бесплатно⭐️
💖 Ссылочка на бота: @cinnamorollstars_bot ᵎᵎ˚.
в моем канале будут проводиться раздачи звездочек, ирисок и валюты в рб🤍
🤍благодарна каждому, кто участвует в моих конкурсах, пишет комменты или ставит реакции, вы очень близки для меня🤍
— С любовью, от Хафи
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @sexwithxafi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хафи” (@sexwithxafi), 4,208 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sexwithxafi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.