Other / unclassifiable β a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelβs own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a modelβs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
23 measurements spanning 92 days, net +176. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 8,457β8,728 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 23:07
8,673
-24
5 Nov 2026, 05:51
8,697
+1
2 Nov 2026, 09:25
8,696
+3
30 Oct 2026, 01:57
8,693
+13
26 Oct 2026, 22:29
8,680
+3
23 Oct 2026, 14:00
8,677
+9
20 Oct 2026, 05:11
8,668
-10
17 Oct 2026, 06:15
8,678
+4
10 Oct 2026, 20:20
8,674
+24
5 Oct 2026, 00:56
8,650
+6
25 Sept 2026, 21:15
8,644
+50
15 Sept 2026, 01:40
8,594
+29
11 Sept 2026, 02:57
8,565
+6
5 Sept 2026, 20:59
8,559
+23
2 Sept 2026, 03:24
8,536
+24
29 Aug 2026, 20:15
8,512
+16
27 Aug 2026, 04:26
8,496
+8
24 Aug 2026, 02:36
8,488
-13
17 Aug 2026, 21:13
8,501
-6
14 Aug 2026, 17:46
8,507
first reading
Engagement
53 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
34.6%
avg views Γ· 8,673 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,000
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.1%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 53 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 25 October 2026
Posts held
53 (11 July 2026 β 25 October 2026)
Views total
9,000
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 00:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
β1,450
Videos
β160
Links
β81
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 8 November 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
22s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
142 reactions across 36 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
129
90.8%
π
3
2.11%
π₯
3
2.11%
π
2
1.41%
π₯°
2
1.41%
π
1
0.704%
π’
1
0.704%
π€·ββ
1
0.704%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 142 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegramβs own βeditedβ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before β this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
π¨ Updated done #25OCT26
Our site Directory always have the most updated information.
---> Www.relax520.com <---
π€ What you can do on site directory?
1οΈβ£ View/Give β rating before/after appointment
2οΈβ£ View/Post π¬ Reviews
3οΈβ£ View/Submit π¨οΈ Discussions
4οΈβ£ View/Give β€οΈβ β to vouch on Reviews/Discussions submitted
5οΈβ£ View π Listings full information like contacts, photos, videos, voice introductions
6οΈβ£ On site π Netβ¦
Check our listing's new voice self instructions feature. Below are some of our Featured listing's sample
π Hello sgRelax from An Qi https://www.relax520.com/masseur/an-qi#voice
π Hello sgRelax from Linda https://www.relax520.com/masseur/linda-6#voice
π Hello sgRelax from Xiao Duo Mei https://www.relax520.com/masseur/xiao-duo-mei#voice
Should you have any suggestions or feedback that we can make our site directoryβ¦
π¨ Updated done #16OCT26
Our site Directory always have the most updated information.
---> Www.relax520.com <---
π€ What you can do on site directory?
1οΈβ£ View/Give β rating before/after appointment
2οΈβ£ View/Post π¬ Reviews
3οΈβ£ View/Submit π¨οΈ Discussions
4οΈβ£ View/Give β€οΈβ β to vouch on Reviews/Discussions submitted
5οΈβ£ View π Listings full information like contacts, photos, videos, voice introductions
6οΈβ£ On site π Netβ¦
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/xiao-yu?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6ab1207e1a3cb2d878cd2db8
Check out Xiao Yu review by U****6
β οΈ If you interested want to ask more, do it on the site page under Discuss Bar to discuss more
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/luna-4?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6a864b7273fb7a0b34f49abf
Check out Luna review by P**f
β οΈ If you interested want to ask more, do it on the site page under Discuss Bar to discuss more
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/an-an-2?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6a85bd0d38acd078c69b457d
Check out An An review by Pi***
β οΈ If you interested want to ask more, do it on the site page under Discuss Bar to discuss more
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/duo-duo?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6a81555e3f0ffaa257f0d446
Check out Duo Duo review by G****ng
β οΈ If you interested want to ask more, do it on the site page under Discuss Bar to discuss more
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/summer-2?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6ab48db034011aefbef8e9c2
Check out Summer review by ιΉ°η26
β οΈ If you interested want to ask more, do it on the site page under Discuss Bar to discuss more
https://www.relax520.com/masseur/shan-shan?shared=1&via=telegram#visit-review-6a990e6828ebf5d73790b691
Check out Shan Shan review by D**5
β€1π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @sgMassageReview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΈπ¬ππββ ML/Shop Reviews Centreβ (@sgMassageReview), 8,673 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sgMassageReview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.