Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for كويزات | موج 🌊

Channel

كويزات | موج 🌊

@sgi_MA

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,025subscribers

-1,349 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002385563784
TypeChannel
Username@sgi_MA
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sgi_MA

Growth

17,02518,37417,699.57 August 2026 — 18,374 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,374 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,329 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,278 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,201 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,160 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,132 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,061 subscribers15 August 2026 — 17,990 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,957 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,923 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,909 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,839 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,746 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,669 subscribers24 August 2026 — 17,536 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,451 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,393 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,359 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,297 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,259 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,204 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,173 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,123 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,082 subscribers4 September 2026 — 17,051 subscribers6 September 2026 — 17,025 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 30 days, net -1,349. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,823–18,576 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 20:1817,025-26
4 Sept 2026, 06:5817,051-31
2 Sept 2026, 19:4217,082-41
1 Sept 2026, 18:2917,123-50
31 Aug 2026, 19:1817,173-31
30 Aug 2026, 16:1417,204-55
29 Aug 2026, 14:2617,259-38
28 Aug 2026, 12:5617,297-62
27 Aug 2026, 10:4517,359-34
26 Aug 2026, 08:0517,393-58
25 Aug 2026, 04:4617,451-85
24 Aug 2026, 03:0817,536-133
22 Aug 2026, 12:3517,669-77
21 Aug 2026, 01:0317,746-93
19 Aug 2026, 21:5417,839-70
18 Aug 2026, 20:0617,909-14
17 Aug 2026, 19:3617,923-34
16 Aug 2026, 15:2517,957-33
15 Aug 2026, 01:2417,990-71
13 Aug 2026, 14:2918,061first reading

Engagement

61 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.58%
avg views ÷ 17,025 subscribers
Avg views / post
439
41 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.505%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
41
of 61 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 33 of 41 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held61 (27 July 20263 September 2026)
Views total17,988
Reactions total84
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 52 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥6348.5%
3728.5%
👏2418.5%
32.31%
💯32.31%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 53 of the 61 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 61 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC70 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج (قسم لينا) 31💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

3 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC72 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج (قسم سهم) 30💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

3 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC63 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج (قسم مريم) 29💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

3 Sept 2026, 05:52 UTC60 viewsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج (قسم رغد) 28💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

2 Sept 2026, 23:23 UTC144 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم فهد ) 27💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 23:21 UTC140 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم محمد ) 26💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥21

2 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC353 views3 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم ليان ) 25💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 13 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

2❤‍🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC321 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم هديل ) 24💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 13 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC277 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم جود ) 23💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 13 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 08:08 UTC218 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم فاطمة ) 22💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 13 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥2

2 Sept 2026, 06:28 UTC219 viewsread 3 September 2026

السلام عليكم نحتاج كم شخص يتطوع يسوي الأقسام الي جت للطلاب بتكون فايده لك ولغيرك الي يقدر يرسل لي هنا 📩 @hox55

2 Sept 2026, 06:26 UTC239 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🎲 اختبار 'أقسام موج ( قسم سوريا ) 20💡| برعاية موج «@sgie511» لأي سؤال الشات « @xf_t0s »' 🖊 14 سؤالًا · ⏱ 15 ث

❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 61 posts we hold for @sgi_MA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“كويزات | موج 🌊” (@sgi_MA), 17,025 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sgi_MA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.