Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аналитика - Сергей Гордеев

Channel

Аналитика - Сергей Гордеев

@sgordeevanalit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

94subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003658522653
TypeChannel
Username@sgordeevanalit
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 11 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded3 November 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sgordeevanalit

Growth

939493.53 Nov 2026, 22:22 — 93 subscribers4 Nov 2026, 18:10 — 94 subscribers3 Nov 2026, 22:224 Nov 2026, 18:10
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 93–94 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 18:1094+1
3 Nov 2026, 22:2293first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.4%
avg views ÷ 94 subscribers
Avg views / post
94.3
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.18%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 October 2026
Posts held20 (11 May 2026 – 29 October 2026)
Views total283
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 22:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

84 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3541.7%
🔥2327.4%
😱1416.7%
🤔55.95%
😡44.76%
❤22.38%
👏11.19%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 84 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 29 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

29 Oct 2026, 06:39 UTC68 views3 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://pravdaurfo.ru/chkts-predupredil-sud-o-zamorazhivanii-zhilfonda-chelyabinska-po-scenariyu-karabasha/

😱3

12 Oct 2026, 11:38 UTC124 views3 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/535657/

👍3

5 Oct 2026, 14:49 UTC207 views7 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

КРЕДИТЫ НЕ СПАСЕНИЕ https://sgordeev.livejournal.com/29093.html Рост доходов бюджета Челябинской области остановился, образовав в текущих ценах некоторое «плато»: за январь - сентябрь на уровне около 185 млрд рублей. Однако в реальности ситуация намного сложнее и в 2027 году реальные доходы бюджета (с поправкой на инфляцию) будут уже на четверть меньше, чем в 2023 году… В любом случае пришло время очень не…

👍6❤1

26 Sept 2026, 16:10 UTC295 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

РАЗВОРОТ К СПАДУ https://sgordeev.livejournal.com/28772.html Текущие значения ключевого для регионального развития Челябинской области индекса промышленного производства (по данным Росстата), подтвердили, что на смену периода высокого роста (c максимумом в 2023 году) пришёл период затяжного спада. Столь резкий разворот местной динамики отбрасывает промышленные результаты региона на пять лет, а при сохранении негати…

🔥2❤1👍1

14 Sept 2026, 12:55 UTC505 views7 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

ФИНАНСОВЫЙ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ - ОТКАТ НА ДЕСЯТИЛЕТИЕ https://sgordeev.livejournal.com/28655.html Данные Росстата за первую половину 2026 года указывают на продолжение невиданного прежде обвального падения финансового результата организаций Челябинской области. При снижении высокого рыночного спроса финансовый результат упал в регионе в 2025 году до 207 млрд рублей, падение продолжилось и в 2026 году…

😱7

9 Sept 2026, 07:39 UTC432 views4 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://svpressa.ru/economy/article/530210/

🔥3👏1

8 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC391 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://m.vk.ru/@itpark74-ne-vosstanie-mashin-chego-deistvitelno-stoit-opasatsya-posle Постепенно появляется новая тематика, пока это как бы эксперимент, но вероятно уже скоро эта тема заявит о себе в реальной жизни. Вопрос только времени и фронт для практики применения здесь более чем обширный. Причем, правовое поле тут очень размыто и спасение утопающих будет стоит немало денег и будет более "делом рук самих уто…

🤔2

3 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC288 views1 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://svpressa.ru/society/article/525200/

👍1

14 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC219 views2 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://svpressa.ru/business/article/523399/

👍2

7 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC227 views3 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Платежи по долгам Южного Урала превысили годовые бюджеты Златоуста и Миасса - Правда УрФО https://pravdaurfo.ru/polnotekst/536337-platezhi-po-dolgam-yuzhnogo-urala-prevysili-godovye-byudzhety-zlatousta-i-miassa/

👍2🔥1

21 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC231 views3 reactionsread 3 November 2026

https://svpressa.ru/business/article/520664/

🔥2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sgordeevanalit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аналитика - Сергей Гордеев” (@sgordeevanalit), 94 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sgordeevanalit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.