Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for shshsh

Channel

shshsh

@shabshabshab1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001692896340
TypeChannel
Username@shabshabshab1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 13 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shabshabshab1

Growth

969997.57 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96 subscribers14 August 2026 — 98 subscribers21 August 2026 — 97 subscribers28 August 2026 — 98 subscribers6 September 2026 — 99 subscribers7 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 96–99 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 17:1799+1
28 Aug 2026, 06:5498+1
21 Aug 2026, 06:2897-1
14 Aug 2026, 06:3798+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:1696no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:5296first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53212060687416776281341.9%
custom 5285319658478517892619.4%
custom 5285523952892918172619.4%
custom 5285441631254756473412.9%
custom 528767536643599358426.45%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 09:28 UTC24 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @FazalomkiPhoto

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩старт 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩продажи билетов

11 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC80 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @whats_that_noise

Пятничный дайджест локальных релизов на WTN Горизонт Событий - Панкратов Степ (2026) ГОСТ Звук Дебютный альбом дуэта Алексея Nocow и Юлии Enginitionific в стиле, который сами музыканты называют frogg-step и pankratov step. IDM и брэйндэнс сменяются бодрым хардкором, в промежутках звучат кинематографичные эмбиент-пьесы, грувовый бит сопровождает яркие мелодии, а легкая ностальгия соседствует с party-hard-весельем. П…

11 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC56 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

наша отчетная компиляция 🫡🫡🫡 попала в сборник!

custom 53212060687416776283

8 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC59 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @audio_klub

Летние звуковые дневники: релиз В основе проекта Летние звуковые дневники лежит практика внимательного слушания и полевой звукозаписи. Мы исследовали звук как архивный артефакт и документ времени, а также учились интегрировать аудиозаписи окружения в музыкальные композиции. Целую неделю участники замедлялись, прислушивались к миру и фиксировали ускользающие моменты жизни, вели звуковые дневники. У каждого было своё …

custom 52854416312547564734custom 53212060687416776282

2 Jul 2026, 21:06 UTC72 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

FIVE AIR CONDITIONERS во время лаборатории звуковых дневников родилась спонтанная идея записать звуки кондиционеров звуки объединились в эмбиент-дроун композицию сборник получился шумным, но в то же время красивым. слушать его желательно находясь рядом с холодильником, вентилятором или любым другим источником техногенного звука

custom 52855239528929181726

2 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTC93 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 52853196584785178926

26 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC72 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @audio_klubPhoto

Меж тем и этим зеленым шумом пишутся наши Звуковые дневники. Делимся фотками!

custom 53212060687416776284

26 Jun 2026, 10:56 UTC66 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

прекрасно гуляем, записываем и слушаем!

custom 52876753664359935842

22 Jun 2026, 22:13 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

glitch, ambience and rhythmic noise set at a Japanese electronics store

custom 53212060687416776284

28 May 2026, 20:59 UTC127 viewsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @at_music_channelPhoto

Boards Of Canada – Inferno WARPCD496 (2026) 01. Introit 02. Prophecy At 1420 MHz 03. Hydrogen Helium Lithium Leviathan 04. Age Of Capricorn 05. Father And Son 06. Somewhere Right Now In The Future 07. Naraka 08. Acts Of Magic 09. Memory Death 10. The Word Becomes Flesh 11. Into The Magic Land 12. Blood In The Labyrinth 13. Deep Time 14. All Reason Departs 15. Arena Americanada ... 1:15:51 #album @ #idm #ambient #do…

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @shabshabshab1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“shshsh” (@shabshabshab1), 99 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shabshabshab1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.