Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 阳光下の碎影

Channel

阳光下の碎影

@shadow_sun

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002113111309
TypeChannel
Username@shadow_sun
Description随心而动,有感而发
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shadow_sun

Growth

2115 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 21 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 05:30 — 21 subscribers15 Aug 2026, 05:1815 Aug 2026, 05:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 05:3021no change
15 Aug 2026, 05:1821first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
95.2%
avg views ÷ 21 subscribers
Avg views / post
20.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
5.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (3 March 20266 August 2026)
Views total20
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 05:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
37
Videos
1
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3058.8%
👍1019.6%
👀47.84%
😐47.84%
11.96%
😢11.96%
🤔11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

格物致知、诚意、正心、修身、齐家、治国、平天下。

🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 13:13 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

找到了被压抑的攻击性,原来人的攻击性真的是守恒的,如果没有散发出去,那就一定会默默地向内攻击自己,又称内耗。

👀2🥰1

9 Jul 2026, 11:45 UTC44 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

2024.6.7 第一次面基(补发一下)

👍2🥰2

29 Jun 2026, 09:28 UTC57 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @QuotLyBotSticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

😐4

30 May 2026, 12:51 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

所以,珍惜暂时的当下。因为欲买桂花同载酒,终不似,少年游。 追求未来的转机。即使一生经历彷徨的挣扎,自信可改变未来,问谁又能做到!

🥰4

30 May 2026, 12:40 UTC92 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

世上唯一不变的,就是世界无时无刻不处于变化之中。

🥰1

19 May 2026, 04:12 UTC116 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

I can never forgive myself from senior until now.

👀2😢1

11 May 2026, 12:43 UTC124 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

看到了让我感觉不舒服的话,我以为是我玻璃心太脆弱了,但最后发现是因为跟发言的人不是一路人。如果想要透过现象看本质,透过言语看人格,就不要盯着动机,要去概括他的行为。嘴可能胡说,脚不会乱走。互联网之大,无奇不有,须明辨是非,不可盲信。

👍5

1 May 2026, 07:56 UTC125 views7 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @chana_lacusPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰6👍1

8 Apr 2026, 10:16 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026

8. 当教育、指导、帮助都以“自立”为目标的时候,其入口在哪里呢? 9. 答案只有一个,那就是“尊重”。 10. “教的一方”要尊重“被教的一方”。没有尊重的地方无法产生良好的人际关系,没有良好的关系就不能顺畅交流。 11. 因为最根源的是要“尊重人”。并不是指尊重特定的他人,而是指尊重所有的他人,包括家人、朋友、擦肩而过的陌路人,甚至是素未谋面的异国人等。 12. 尊重就是实事求是地看待一个人并认识到其独特个性的能力 13. 不要试图改变或者操控眼前的他人。不附加任何条件地去认可“真实的那个人”。这就是最好的尊重。并且,假如有人能认可“真实的自己”,那个人应该也会因此获得巨大的勇气。可以说尊重也是“鼓励”之根源。

🥰2👍1

8 Apr 2026, 10:15 UTC123 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026

1. 我们通过实施教育想要孩子变成什么呢? 2. 教育的目标简而言之就是“自立”。 3. 人都有极力逃脱无力状态不断追求进步的需求,也就是“优越性追求”。蹒跚学步的婴儿渐渐可以独立行走,掌握语言与周围人进行沟通交流。也就是说,人都追求自由,追求脱离无力而不自由状态之后的“自立”。这是一种根本性的需求。 4. 教育不是“干涉”,而是“帮助”其自立。 5. 人应该如何在共同体中生活,如何与他人相处,如何才能在共同体中找到自己的位置;认识“我”,认识“你”,了解人的本性,理解人的理想状态。阿德勒把这种知识叫作“人格知识”。 6. 这种人格知识无法从书本上获得,只能从与他人交往的人际关系实践中学习。在这个意义上,可以说有众多人围绕的学校比家庭更具教育价值。 7. 心理咨询也是如此。心理咨询师就是帮助来访者“自立”,共同思考自立所需要的“人格知识”

🥰2

19 Mar 2026, 11:13 UTCviews —

阳光下の碎影 pinned «竹石 咬定青山不放松,立根原在破岩中。 千磨万击还坚劲,任尔东西南北风。»

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @shadow_sun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,416,806 of 1,601,189entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“阳光下の碎影” (@shadow_sun), 21 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shadow_sun.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.