Channel
@shajdhhajd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
275subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002492771730 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shajdhhajd |
| Created | 14 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shajdhhajd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:20 | 275 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:28 | 276 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 06:36 | 277 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 278 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 14 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☃ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 14 February 2025 to 3 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏖️强烈推荐一个完美的和平公益项目❗️ 😄独家hook/dev/kpm驱动自隐藏全部痕迹 😃UI简洁不掺和AI成分😄自瞄有无模块陀螺仪自瞄 😃拥有内核级追踪硬件断点😄硬件区分之外的权重追 😃和平解密有坐标解密和算法解密 😄优化极致流畅的绘制绘图 😃😃⭐ ✅迫击炮雷达✅安全区预测✅观战预警 ✅猎鹰预警✅掉血追踪/框内追踪/框内自瞄 ✅防减伤追踪✅防减伤自瞄 ✅权重/硬件断点结合追踪✅独家驱动陀螺仪漏打追踪 🌟https://t.me/vip_Doro 🌟https://t.me/vip_Doro 🌟https://t.me/vip_Doro
✅想玩文件的兄弟们有福了✅ ✅此频道经常更新付费文件✅ ❗️ https://t.me/SNGF666888 ❗️ ⭐ https://t.me/SNGF666888 ⭐ 🌈 https://t.me/SNGF666888 🌈 每天泛滥全网作者的牛逼付费文件
☃3
Signed time 【Eternal】
✅官方文件圈大牛内部群✅ https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB https://t.me/YQOBB ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
❤1
Signed Time
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @shajdhhajd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“导航” (@shajdhhajd), 275 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shajdhhajd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.