Channel
@shakhtar_reve
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
436subscribers
+66 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003737819237 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shakhtar_reve |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 29 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shakhtar_reve |
Sports — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 23:16 | 436 | +2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 22:37 | 434 | +23 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 17:57 | 411 | +40 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 371 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:20 | 370 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 370 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
406 reactions across 17 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 149 | 36.7% | |
| 😁 | 99 | 24.4% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 10.8% | |
| 👀 | 19 | 4.68% | |
| 🤡 | 19 | 4.68% | |
| custom 5947325464849683037 | 18 | 4.43% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 3.94% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 3.45% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 1.72% | |
| custom 5224708023435404637 | 6 | 1.48% | |
| custom 5949293749577191775 | 5 | 1.23% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.739% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 0.493% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 0.493% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.246% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.246% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.246% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 406 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Шановна пресслужбо «Шахтаря», передайте, будь ласка, Турану, що вболівальникам важливо знати про стан здоров’я та відновлення травмованих гравців. Якщо тренер чомусь не бажає відповідати на подібні запитання, то чому б не робити оновлення щодо травмованих раз на два тижні? Чому вболівальники мають дізнаватися про травмованих від інсайдерів? Реве та стогне⚒
❤20💯7👍1🤡1
Шахтар продовжує пошук центрального захисника🤣 За інформацією Віктора Вацка, гірники вели перемовини з Максі Таловєровим та Аланом Маттурро, проте в підсумку від обидвох кандидатур відмовились. Я дуже сподівався, що історія про Максі – це лише чутки, але схоже, що в керівництві є мазохісти. Батагова візьміть та закрийте позицію😁 Реве та стогне ⚒️
😢13❤2
Матч з Кудрівкою можна поділити на три періоди: 1) Середній блок (1 - 32 хв) 2) Низький блок (32 - 55 хв) 3) Зневіра Кудрівки (55 - 90 хв) Якщо з двома останніми періодами все ясно, то в першому, я помітив для себе один цікавий момент. Шахтар почав частіше використовувати вертикальні передачі за спини захисникам. Причому вже зараз це можна назвати напрацюванням, адже є чітко розподілені ролі. В схемі 4-4-2, в якій…
❤17❤🔥2👍1
Габріель Мек побачив зональний захист Шахтаря на стандартах та вирішив допомогти📝 Новина прикольна, бо змушує замислитись чи варто взагалі публікувати його інсайди. Реве та стогне⚒
❤10😁3👎1
Хто тримав Думанюка? 👍 – Федоров 🔥 – Габріель Мек ❤️ – бутс Турана Реве та стогне⚒
❤33🔥14👍9🤡1
Обожнюю анальний зональний захист Шахтаря на стандартах😫 Реве та стогне⚒
😁16custom 59473254648496830374❤2🤬1
Схоже, що весь цьогорічний трансферний бюджет Шахтаря пішов на колаборації з інфлюенсерами 😐 Набрати купу вінгерів та не взяти жодного гравця центру поля або захисту – це дивно. Особисто я вважаю це трансферне вікно провальним. Проблемні позиції не підсилені, заміни Матвієнку та Педро Енріке не знайдено, в центрі поля страждатиме Назарина... Дуже хотів би перевзутися 🤡 Реве та стогне⚒
❤20😁3👍1
Тобіас тепер іспано-бразилець🤠 Раян все ще українець, ну добре хоч не призовний😬 Реве та стогне⚒
❤23😁6🙏2
Сьогодні мережею розлетілася новина про те, що якийсь "народний" депутат з юлькиної партії готує законопроект про мінімальне представництво українців після зміни ліміту в УПЛ🤡 Цікаво, що цей же депутат раніше вже вилизував свого ОПЗЖшного дружбана та просив залишити Грішу почесним громадянином Харківської області. Вони навіть не приховують своїх намірів та відкрито використовують усі важелі впливу. Пам'ятаєте істор…
🤡17custom 59492937495771917755🤯3
Здається, що нам не вистачає вінгерів...
😁23👍1
З поверненням, ми скучали💻 Реве та стогне⚒
👍27❤7
Пахнуть начинает всё страннее✌️🎈
😁16😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shakhtar_reve. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реве та стогне Шахтар донецький ⚒️” (@shakhtar_reve), 436 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shakhtar_reve.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.