Channel
@shams_blogs
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
64subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001669581123 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shams_blogs |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shams_blogs |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 64 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 65 | +2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 63 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 14:28 | 66 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 65 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 65 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:03 | 64 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 5 | 71.4% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Oʻrta meyyor(vosot) yoʻq bularda. Yo birovni spalnisigacha kirvoradi yoki umuman hech nima qimedi. Hozir bir nima hayolimga keppoldi. Ish qilib shu brat aidan foydalangani fosh boʻppogandan keyin shap splaniygacha tekshirvormaganmikan-a? Yaʼni ikkala kalla qoʻygan ham bitta odam emasmikan? (Yozib boʻlguncha kuldim)
😁1
Sen mening sevgimni his qilganingda edi oshiq boʻlishdan qoʻrqib qolar eding....
Bir kuni sakkizoyoqdan qaysi oyogʻingni birinchi bosasan deb soʻrashgan ekan, sakkizoyoq oʻylanib yurolmay qolibdi.)
Endi tasavvur qilib koʻring, agar bizni davrgacha tuya degan hayvon yetib kelmaganida edi, biz bu skeletni qazilma oʻlaroq topsak, bu hayvonning skeletiga qarab qanday tasavvur qilgan boʻlar edik? Yana bir savol, biz bugungi kunimizda dinazavrlar suyagini koʻrib shu suyak haqida qilayotgan tasavvurimiz naqadar toʻgʻri ekan-a? Xoʻsh, endi huddi shunday yondashuvni avstralopitek, neondertal, kramanyon suyaklari haqid…
Ushbu rasmni birinchi marta koʻrganda qaysi hayvon skeleti deb oʻyladingiz? Yordam olmagan xolatda.
Uzoq muddatli sukunatdan soʻng Monotheos yana oʻz faoliyatini yuritayotgan quvonarli. Alloh hayrli qilsin.
Voice message, posted without a caption
Kishining yuzsizlashib borayotganining dalili — nasihat kor qilmay qoʻyishidir.
Ayrim xonimlarga! "Post" larni o'qiyman bo'lib hayrona, Jiddiy mavzularda kulib, qotishar. Ostidan nom qo'yib Ummu Falona, Kommentlar bahona gaplar otishar! Sochib qalblardagi pinhon hislarin, Diniy so'zlar topib bahonasiga Eriga aytmagan iliq so'zlarin Aytarlar nomahram parvonasiga. Kuzgi xazon kabi so'lib ketmishdir - Ne bo'ldi rijollar himmatlariga! Yo Rabbiy, nimalar bo'lmoqda, axir, So'nggi Payg'ambarning umm…
Аудио из видео
Video, posted without a caption
❤1
Posted without readable text
😁1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shams_blogs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐆ʻ𝐨𝐥𝐢𝐛 𝐟𝐢𝐤𝐫𝐥𝐚𝐫” (@shams_blogs), 64 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shams_blogs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.