#GroupA #radiology
💯1
Channel
@sharedExp50
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
363subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004472404397 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sharedExp50 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sharedExp50 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 363 | +9 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:54 | 354 | +2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 | 352 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 12:47 | 352 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 August 2026 – 1 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,970 |
| Reactions total | 30 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Sept 2026, 23:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
30 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 96.7% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 3.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 30 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#GroupA #radiology
💯1
نصائح للناس اللي عندهم توه أشعة، تقريبًا قروب F: أول شيء نحكي على طبيعة المحاضرات اللي حتاخذوهن: عندكم أول أسبوع حتاخذوا طبعًا مش عارفة هل ترتيب الجدول نفسنا أم لا، حتاخذوا اللي هن CVS، وNuclear Medicine، وVascular، وحتاخذوا Renal، وRespiratory. المهم ما تعدلوش واجد على ترتيبي المواضيع، بس هي الفكرة شنو؟ هن أربع أسابيع: • الأسبوع الأول والأسبوع الثالث: مواضيع جدد. الدكتور حيجيب مثلًا يعطيك Bone، يقعد يشرحلكم مثلًا عل…
❤2
• طبيعة أسئلة الـ Spot (4 أسئلة): A. الـ Modality (ثابت). B. الـ Description. C. الـ Diagnosis. D. السؤال الرابع (متغير بين كل Spot وSpot، ويكون فيه جزئية نظري). مثلًا نحن الـ Fracture of the neck of the femur نحن مش واخدينها في الجامعة ولا الدكتور محمد خليل حاطها في شيته، وجابلي الـ Complication متاع الـ Fracture of the neck of the femur. فيعني حاولوا لما تاخدوا Fracture تعرفوا في كل Spot في الأشعة شنو الـ Complicat…
❤2
من رسائل القناة: اللي قروا مع نتفه شنجو الشرح ودرجاتكم ؟ انا عارفة ان الدرجات يعتمدن علي اجتهادك الشخصي بس اكيد الشرح حتى هو مهم ياريت تفيدونا بتجاربكم
#groupB #community
Community نصائح السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته بالنسبة لتجربتي في الكوميونتي حنحكي عليها كمادة ، و المحاضرات شن جوهن ومن أحسن دكاترة ، مع من تاخذوا؟ وكيف تقروها كم تغيبوا وأي محاضرات؟، شن جو الامتحان ؟ 🛑طبعا أول شي كالعادة هذينا نصائحي الخاصة لأن في الكوميونتي بالذات كل حد يعطي في راي فيها مختلف عالآخر. 🔸️فهي كمادة حسيتها نزيكة وخفيفة بالمجمل إلا بعض المواضيع، والحق تعلمت فيها واجد خذيت نظرة اوسع عالطب وعالمنظوم…
❤1
🔸️بالنسبة لمحاضرات الجامعة ومع من تقروا الحق الغالبية ممتازين ويركزوا على حاجات يجيبوا فيهن، وحتى الجزئيات لي يفوتوا فيهن في الغالب ينفهمن عادي وفي طبعا لي شرحهم مش اوي كالعادة بس حاولوا مادامكم حضرتوا تركزوا وتكتبوا ملاحظات عشان حرفيا من كثر بديهياتها المادة مرات ماتركزوش على حاجات وتلقوهن في الاسئلة 🔹️حنقوللكم من التوب عندي د.نادية الدروقي عطتنا infection control مع انه محاضرتها اغلبيتها قصص بس تهزوش عليهن تجيب …
❤3
#GroupB #community هنقولكم على ملخص روته الكميونتي بالنسبه ليا شخصيا وكل حد وتجربته وبالنسبة اللي صار في إمتحان ✨ الحق هيا مادة متفهمش شن مغزاها وشن تبي وتحس روحك تبحت في كورسات والشيت وتقول شن نقرأ وشن نخلي تنحفظ ولا تنفهم نا كملت روتتها ومش عارفه كنها هك 😕، بالنسبه للشيتات ف تحسهن معاش بيكملن بس يلتمن ودكاترة الجامعة في منهم المممتاز والكويس وهكذا في دكتورة نادية الدروقي هذي دكتورة متتفوتش بكل بكل والآخرين بروضوا…
❤1
#GroupB #community 🌸 بالنسبة للحضور احضروا، أغلب الدكاترة كويسين وحتلقوا جزء كبير من الشيت انفهم غادي استغلوا حماس البدايات في شيتات الاونلاين وشيتات الأمراض قبل ما تخشوا جزئية family medicine وما يتبعها حتلقوهن مملات شوي. ف ما تبدوش فيهن ترقالكم من المادة وتكتشفوا أنهن ما يحتاجنش هذك المجهود مقارنة بالأمراض والأمراض هنا نقصد اللي حتلقوهن اونلاين + endemic in Libya: plague , TB - - - 🌸 بالنسبة لشيتات التطعيمات - Va…
❤3
#GroupC #ophthalmology عيون قروب c روته صعوبتها هى كميه المنهج في وقت يعتبر قصير عليها بذات ان اغلب النظري عطوه في شهر ثمانيه الافضل ان تبدي سلايد ع شان وقت الكلينك يقعد عندك فكره على الي ح تشوفه لو بديتوا كلينك الافضل تقروا قبلها ع شان تفهموا وتستفيدوا من الشرح الدكاتره الاغلب كويسين كلينك في دكتور صحبان كويس مجدي شحومي ممتااز والبرغثي حتى هو و دكتوره اميره شرحها كويس الدكاتره الي يشرحوا سلايد وتتوريال حتى هم ال…
❤2
#community #GroupB
الكميونتي اهم شي التزمو بالهدوء و تعانو معاهم زي قروب A عشان ميصيرلكمش زي قروب B ✨️ عن نفسي مصدري من الخاص استفدت منه ممكن في 3 مواضيع بس بعدها لقيت الوقت الي خذاه نقدر نقرا فيه محسيتش ان زادني حاجة بما ان نحضر فالجامعة في مواضيع معينة تحتاج شيت اخر منهم اتابع بيه بس كشرح لا كملتها مع Gemini اشرح و وضح و بسط و تحملني الحق مع ان كنت نقول ميف يقرو فيها هك بس مشت و شوف mcq قبل يوريك شن يبو منك فالشيت بعدها خش فيه ال…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sharedExp50. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“نصائح الطلبة حول روتتهم السابقة | الدفعة 50” (@sharedExp50), 363 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharedExp50.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.