برای خرید اکانت اشتراکی GPT یا انجام پرداخت بین المللی به آیدی پشتیبانی پیام دهید
@SharifGPTadmin
اگه اکانت تون بن بشه یا به مشکل بخوره ما براتون جایگزین می کنیم
ما توی SharifGPT هر پرداخت بینالمللی که نیاز داشته باشید رو انجام میدیم
Created
16 October 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 93 days, net -1,785. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 56,009–58,330 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 22:46
56,277
-37
5 Nov 2026, 22:01
56,314
-3
4 Nov 2026, 19:18
56,317
-26
3 Nov 2026, 16:36
56,343
-16
2 Nov 2026, 16:49
56,359
-21
1 Nov 2026, 19:00
56,380
-6
31 Oct 2026, 22:06
56,386
-14
30 Oct 2026, 22:36
56,400
-26
29 Oct 2026, 20:19
56,426
-38
28 Oct 2026, 17:17
56,464
-25
27 Oct 2026, 17:06
56,489
-13
26 Oct 2026, 19:16
56,502
-7
25 Oct 2026, 19:38
56,509
+3
24 Oct 2026, 20:27
56,506
-31
23 Oct 2026, 17:59
56,537
-19
22 Oct 2026, 17:38
56,556
-42
21 Oct 2026, 11:18
56,598
-8
20 Oct 2026, 06:48
56,606
+56
19 Oct 2026, 09:17
56,550
-10
18 Oct 2026, 11:40
56,560
first reading
Engagement
244 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 187 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 56,277 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,710
68 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.757%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
68
of 244 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
244 (29 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
388,090
Reactions total
2,939
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 23:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,140
Videos
≈606
Links
≈796
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 09m
Average length
51s
Measured directly from 82 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,302 reactions across 240 posts, in 41 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,480
43.5%
❤
2,410
23.4%
😁
890
8.64%
🤯
802
7.78%
🔥
356
3.46%
👻
293
2.84%
💔
218
2.12%
🗿
130
1.26%
👌
84
0.815%
😍
62
0.602%
🤩
62
0.602%
❤🔥
52
0.505%
👀
51
0.495%
🤷♂
51
0.495%
😢
46
0.447%
🎉
42
0.408%
👾
31
0.301%
👏
30
0.291%
🌚
22
0.214%
🤓
20
0.194%
21 further kinds
170
1.65%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 242 of the 244 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,362 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 25 of 68 posts held from the last 30 days (36.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎬 ویدئوهای هوش مصنوعی ^گوگل^ حالا ۵۰٪ طولانیتر و ۳۰٪ ارزونتر شدن!
🆕 مدل Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash از امروز به صورت عمومی در دسترس قرار گرفت.
- با این مدل میتونی ویدئوهایی تا ۱۵ ثانیه تولید یا ویرایش کنی؛ درحالیکه سقف نسخه قبلی ۱۰ ثانیه بود. حتی میتونی مدت زمان ویدئو رو به دلخواه و با دقت یک ثانیه، بین ۳ تا ۱۵ ثانیه انتخاب کنی.
- اما قابلیت جذابترش اینه که میتونی همون ویدئو رو داخل چت ویرایش کنی؛ مثلاً محصول …
؛
از دیدن پوسترای تبلیغاتی ساخته شده با AI خستم!
از دیدن ویدیوی میوهجات سخنگو خستهام!
از ویدیوهایی که بچهها رو از یه موقعیت خطرناک نجات میدن خستم! 🥲😂
#AI_Tweet
؛
شما اضافه کنین 🦦
➕ @Sharifgpt
➕ @Sharifgpt
🖼 معرفی ChatGPT Images 2.6
حالا میتونید با این نسخه، GIF بسازید و تصاویر مرجع رو هم برای استفادههای بعدی ذخیره کنید!
🎞 ساخت GIF متحرک!
فقط کافیه یه پرامپت یا تصویر بدید تا جی پی تی براتون GIF بسازه. حتی میتونید سرعتش رو تغییر بدید، فریمهای مختلف رو جداگانه ویرایش کنید و انیمیشن بسازید که مدام تکرار بشه.
📌 یک بار ذخیره کن، بارها استفاده کن!
میتونی تصاویر مرجع از خودت، حیوانات خونگی یا شخصیتهای موردعلاقهات ر…
🎧 برنده جایزه نوبل: شاید بهتر بود هرگز هوش مصنوعی رو توسعه نمیدادیم!
- جفری هینتون؛ پدر خوانده هوش مصنوعی، در جدیدترین گفتوگویش با روزنامه گاردین هشدار داده که شاید بشر در آینده به این نتیجه برسه که توسعه ندادن هوش مصنوعی تصمیم عاقلانهتری بود!!
- هینتون معتقده سرعت پیشرفت هوش مصنوعی از توانایی ما برای کنترل خطراتش بیشتر شده و ممکنه بهزودی شاهد حادثهای در مقیاس فاجعه چرنوبیل باشیم؛ البته نه لزوماً یک حادثه هس…
😼 مدارسی که تصمیم بگیرن استفاده از هوش مصنوعی رو به طور کامل ممنوع کنن، دسترسی دانشآموزان به سرچ گوگل رو هم از دستمیدن!
گوگل اعلام کرده از اوایل سال ۲۰۲۷، ابزارهای هوش مصنوعی به صورت پیشفرض برای دانشآموزان مقاطع ابتدایی تا دبیرستان غیرفعال خواهند بود؛ مگه اینکه مدارس مشخصاً اجازه استفاده از اونها رو بدن.
🔵اما نکته عجیب: مدارسی که استفاده از هوش مصنوعی رو بهطور کامل مسدود کنن، دسترسی دانشآموزان به گوگل سرچ …
📚دانشگاه استنفورد پاییز امسال آموزش ساخت ایجنتهای AI رو شروع کرده و اسلایدهای تمام جلساتش هم بهصورت #رایگان در دسترس همه قرار داده!
این دوره با عنوان «مهندسی ایجنتهای هوش مصنوعی» (CS329Z) برگزار میشه. هرکسی میتونه اسلایدها و منابع مطالعاتی جلسات رو بهترتیب در سایت دوره ببینه.
💡توی این دوره چی یاد میگیرید؟
1️⃣ ساخت ایجنت از صفر؛ از بازیابی اطلاعات و استفاده از ابزارها گرفته تا چرخه عملکرد ایجنت و آشنایی با فر…
🔌 کنترل گوشی از راه دور با کمک هوش مصنوعی!
حالا هر ایجنت هوش مصنوعی که از MCP پشتیبانی میکنه، میتونه از طریق فضای ابری یک گوشی واقعی اندروید یا آیفون رو کنترل کنه!
- با این ابزار، AI میتونه:
✅ صفحه گوشی رو ببینه.
✅ روی صفحه ضربه بزنه.
✅ متن تایپ کنه.
✅ بین صفحات اسکرول و سوایپ کنه.
🧠 نکته جالب اینه که نیازی به نصب هیچ برنامهای روی گوشی نیست؛ فقط کافیه URL رو وارد کنین و وارد حساب کاربری بشین.
این قابلیت بهعن…
🚨 هوش مصنوعی خودآگاه نسازید!
مصطفی سلیمان، مدیرعامل بخش AI مایکروسافت، در واکنش به بحثهای اخیر درباره حقوق هوش مصنوعی، هشدار مهمی داده:
- هوش مصنوعی امروز خود آگاه نیست؛ نه چیزی رو احساس میکنه و نه رنج میکشه. اما مسئله اینه که نباید اجازه بدیم به مرحله خودآگاهی برسه.
- ساخت هوش مصنوعی خودآگاه میتونه یکی از خطرناکترین تصمیمهای تاریخ بشر باشه. موجوداتی دیجیتال که شاید بهزودی از مجموع انسانها باهوشتر بشن، ممک…
https://t.me/sharifgpt_comment/114348
تو کامنتهای این پست میتونین یه AI تر و تمیز برای تبدیل ویس به متن به دوستتون معرفی کنین که با فارسی هم اوکی باشه و خودتون هم تجربهی خوبی باهاش داشتید.
🥁اولین پیشنهاد ابزار تبدیل ویس به متن:👇🏼
از زبان فارسی هم پشتیبانی میکنه
🤖https://t.co/Td2uDuYLdr
خوبیش اینه که لازم نیست کتابهایی که میخواید رو با حجم بالا دانلود و بعد آپلود کنید؛ میشه خیلی راحت از بخش منابع Notebook کتابها رو پیدا و به لیستتون اضافه کنید.🔥📚
👍11❤5🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 244 posts we hold for @sharifgpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@sharifgpt edited 10 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
11 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @sharifgpt as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
16 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
16 September 2026
Median time before seen missing
36 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
بچهها این ربات و اکستنشنی که بالا دیدین
فقط دوتا نمونه از چیزاییه که تیم ما با Codex ساخته👀
🔍پایه هستین از این به بعد یاد بگیریم چطوری با AI همچین چیزای کاربردیای برای خودمون بسازیم؟ یعنی قشنگ از 0 تا 100 باهم بریم جلو ببینیم چخبره💯
آره آره، پایهام 🚀82%
نه، علاقهای ندارم10%
بلدم، چیزای خفنتر بگو 😎8%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤖 دوستان شما بیشتر برای چه کاری از هوش مصنوعی کمک میگیرید؟
1️⃣ برنامه نویسی و توسعه نرمافزار43%
2️⃣ تولید محتوا و ایده پردازی23%
3️⃣ پژوهش و کارهای آکادمیک43%
4️⃣ درس، دانشگاه و یادگیری45%
5️⃣ کارهای شخصی و روزمره36%
6️⃣ امور اداری و سازمانی10%
7️⃣ سایر موارد (برامون تو گروه کامنت بنویسید 👇🏼)3%
The shares total 203%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 244 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
3
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
3
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sharifgpt named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sketch named in 2 posts, 16 September 2026 – 20 September 2026
@shairfgpt_academy named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
@shairfgptacademy_admin named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SharifGPT” (@sharifgpt), 56,277 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharifgpt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.