Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 44 days, net +124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 747–940 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 11:59
893
-12
10 Sept 2026, 21:39
905
-6
2 Sept 2026, 10:58
911
-4
25 Aug 2026, 15:32
915
-3
13 Aug 2026, 14:36
918
+149
6 Aug 2026, 15:48
769
no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:48
769
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
113 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
65
57.5%
👍
27
23.9%
❤🔥
6
5.31%
👎
6
5.31%
✍
5
4.42%
💔
3
2.65%
💯
1
0.885%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
دیدِ گلخانهای
اولینبار اصطلاح “گلخانه” را در گزارشی دربارهی یک جشنوارهی سینمایی به کار بردم.
منظورم از گلخانه، جایی است که همهچیز در آن خوب رشد میکند؛ اما فقط تا وقتی که شرایط همانطور که هست باقی بماند.
گلخانه، جای امنی است. هوا اندازه است، دما کنترل شده، آفتی وارد نمیشود. اما مشکلش این است که گیاهِگلخانه، کمتر با جهان بیرون مواجه میشود. کمتر باد دیده، کمتر طوفان دیده، کمتر مجبور شده ریشههایش را محکمتر …
کودکیِ من، بوی اسپند میداد.
چند شبِ مشخص از سال، خیابانها رنگ دیگری میگرفتند. پارچههای سیاه از سر کوچه آویزان میشدند. مادرم لباس مشکیاش را از کمد بیرون میآورد. صدای نوحه از مسجد محله تا نیمههای شب میآمد. استکانهای چای میان دستها میچرخیدند. مردها آرامتر حرف میزدند. زنها بیشتر گریه میکردند.
آن روزها، نام حسین را پیش از آنکه بفهمم، دوست داشتم.
سالها بعد، یک سؤال آرامآرام از میان همان خاطرهها سر بلن…
بارها پیش آمده که دربارهی فضیلتی حرف زدهایم، بیآنکه فرصت کرده باشیم همان فضیلت را در خودمان جستوجو کنیم. از عدالت گفتهایم، از صداقت نوشتهایم، از احترام دفاع کردهایم؛ اما زندگی، معیارهای خودش را دارد و کمتر از واژهها قانع میشود.
مَن نَصَبَ نفسهُ لِلنَّاسِ إماما، فلیَبدأُ بتعلیم نفسهِ قبلَ تعلیم غیره.
هر کس خود را پیشوای مردم قرار میدهد، باید پیش از آموزش دیگران، از آموزش خود آغاز کند.
این جمله را که میخوانم، احساس میکنم مسیر را برعکسِ آن چیزی ترسیم میکند که معمولاً به آن عادت کردهایم.
ما اغلب از بیرون شروع میکنیم؛ از نقد کردن، اصلاح کردن، تذکر دادن و قانع کردن دیگران. انگار همیشه کسی آنطرف ایستاده که باید تغییر کند.
اما امیرالمؤمنی…
در کانال “فیل و سوفی” همین حرف را به زبان دیگری نوشتم؛ کوتاهتر و شخصیتر. اما دلم میخواهد اینجا همان تجربه را از زاویهای دیگر و با توضیح بیشتری روایت کنم.
امروز از جلسهی تراپیام یک چیز مهم یاد گرفتم.
اینکه مهرورزی من نباید قربانی بیرحمی یا بیحیایی دیگران شود.
شاید در نگاه اول جملهی خیلی سادهای به نظر برسد؛ از همان چیزهایی که همه میگویند “خب معلوم است”. اما تجربهی من میگوید دانستن یک اصل، با زندگی کردنش…
راستش را بخواهید، طول کشید تا بفهمم قد آدم هم مثل خیلی چیزهای دیگر، یک جایی تمام میشود. نه با صدای زنگی، نه با یک اتفاق خاص. یک روز صبح از خواب بیدار نمیشوی که ببینی چند سانت به تو اضافه شده و حالا دنیا همانطور که همیشه فکر میکردی باید باشد، شده است.
من اما مدتها منتظر آن روز بودم.
شاید تقصیر خودم نبود. وقتی آدم در خانهای بزرگ میشود که زنهایش قدبلندند؛ مادری که همیشه از بالای سر آدم نگاه میکند، خالههایی ک…
کودکان دیوانهام خوانند و پیران ساحرم من تفرجگاهِ ارواح پریشان خاطرم
چون صدف در سینه مروارید پنهان کردهام در دلِ خود مؤمنم، در چشم مردم کافرم!
فاضل نظری
شریکِ همکف pinned «یکی از دوستان کانال ازم پرسیده بود چرا به نظرم “رویای نیمهشب” رمان خوبی نیست و سریالش هم ارزش دیدن نداره. جوابهایی که به ایشون دادم رو اینجا با کمترین تغییر منتشر میکنم. امیدوارم به درد شما هم بخوره. از اون مهمتر، امیدوارم این نوشتهها فقط نقد یک کتاب…»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sharike_hamkaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
اشعار علی صاحبکار @sahebkarali_poems · 24,358 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 September 2026
لئون پروکسی Lion MTProto @Lion_MTProto · 40,547 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 30 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شریکِ همکف” (@sharike_hamkaf), 893 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sharike_hamkaf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.