Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 欣欣的评价

Channel

欣欣的评价

@shhxinxinpj

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 18 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004307278309
TypeChannel
Username@shhxinxinpj
Created18 October 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded18 October 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/shhxinxinpj

Growth

118 Oct 2026, 22:47 — 1 subscribers18 Oct 2026, 23:22 — 1 subscribers18 Oct 2026, 22:4718 Oct 2026, 23:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Oct 2026, 23:221no change
18 Oct 2026, 22:471first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
100.0%
avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026
Posts held19 (18 October 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Views total18
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Oct 2026, 23:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Links
10

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

野寻·上海作业评价, [2026/10/8 上午9:00] [ 转发自 野寻·上海作业评价 ] [🖼 ♡ 星野严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间:2026-10-07 👩🏻‍🎓 服务老师:欣欣 👨🏻‍💻 留名:匿名 💌 服务过程 : 十一期间好多人都休假了,欣欣刚好有空,果断约起来,准时到地方,没有罚站,妹子有170多,身材微胖,态度很好,寒暄之后开始洗漱,LS会问是否需要培育,BL也没有这个特殊爱好,自己洗白白后让老师穿上战袍开始进入主题,妹子👅很灵活,把三个点照顾的很好,小弟弟口的时间蛮久,有SH赞一个,FW过后开始进入主题,看到其他报告说HR无敌,传教士过后果断尝试了一下,简直是感觉和视觉的双重享受,臀浪一波接着一波,没几下就被秒了,推荐LY下次去的时候一定要尝试 🔗 老师资料 :https://t.me/chasesh_lsda/3223] ♡ 星野严选 ♡ ⌚️ 评价时间:2026-10-07 👩🏻‍🎓 服务老…

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海泡泡屋修车报告模版:https://t.me/shpaopaowujlq 【妹子艺名】:欣欣 【联系方式】:@xinxin1_12 【所在位置】:浦东 【上课水费】: 600p 【验证留名】:悲情大土豆(蓝休版) 【验证时间】:10月5 【体验评价】:8 【人照几成】:8 【身材描述】:微坦 【老师类型】: 嫩妹 【服务过程描述】:ls人照基本吻合9分像了,只是真人比照片胖加上1米7几的身高也算是bbw了.口活部分算是嫩妹标配但可能因为ls刚做不久加上牙龈问题没法做很久,其他方面倒是基本提要求都会好好配合.ls刚做两个月会的比较少,可能需要ly们慢慢开发, 【温馨提醒】:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座 注:提交报告需要约课记录

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

🎖精英作业🎖 💃艺名:欣欣 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/33725 ⛳️位置: #浦东新区 🙍‍♂️学生:悲情土豆(蓝休版) ———————————————— ls人照基本吻合9分像了,只是真人比照片胖加上1米7几的身高也算是bbw了.口活部分算是嫩妹标配但可能因为ls刚做不久加上牙龈问题没法做很久,其他方面倒是基本提要求都会好好配合.ls刚做两个月会的比较少,可能需要ly们慢慢开发,

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海出击报告【杏花楼】, [2026/10/4 上午9:03] [ 转发自 上海出击报告【杏花楼】 ] [🎥 上海出击报告【杏花楼】 【综合评价分】:9 【身材形象分】: 8.5 【服务态度分】:9 【情绪价值分】:9 —————————————— 【学生署名】:招财叔叔 【验证时间】:10/03 【老师花名】:欣欣 【位置区域】: 浦东 【上课课费】:600P 【服务内容】:嫩妹三件套 —————————————— 【出击体验】:十一期间好多人都休假了,欣欣刚好有空,果断约起来,准时到地方,没有罚站,妹子有170多,身材微胖,态度很好,寒暄之后开始洗漱,LS会问是否需要培育,BL也没有这个特殊爱好,自己洗白白后让老师穿上战袍开始进入主题,妹子👅很灵活,把三个点照顾的很好,小弟弟口的时间蛮久,有SH赞一个,FW过后开始进入主题,看到其他报告说HR无敌,传教士过后果断尝试了一下,简直是感觉和视觉的双重享受,臀浪一波接着一波…

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

【时间】:2026-10-01 【老师】:欣欣 【留名】:花火 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8.5 【身材】:8.5 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:8.5 【综合】:8.58 【过程】:报名了速度出击约好时间就开车过去了路程有点远开了一个小时感觉老师指导上去.开门的那一刻突然觉得值得了,老师和我想象的不一样.真人比视频和照片好看多了人也没有照片那么的壮实属于微胖.值得一提的是屁股很大后入非常的舒服,这个价位颜值很不错的老师除了是嫩妹没有什么服务外没有别的毛病了有机会在复刷 【狼友大队】:点击入群

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

【时间】:2026-10-01 【老师】:欣欣 【留名】:花火 【人照】:9 【颜值】:8.5 【身材】:8.5 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:8.5 【综合】:8.58 【过程】:报名了速度出击约好时间就开车过去了路程有点远开了一个小时感觉老师指导上去.开门的那一刻突然觉得值得了,老师和我想象的不一样.真人比视频和照片好看多了人也没有照片那么的壮实属于微胖.值得一提的是屁股很大后入非常的舒服,这个价位颜值很不错的老师除了是嫩妹没有什么服务外没有别的毛病了有机会在复刷 【狼友大队】:点击入群

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

【时间】:2026-09-12 【老师】:欣欣 【留名】:Pacific 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:7.5 【服务】:7.5 【态度】:8 【环境】:8 【综合】:7.83 【过程】:遥控上门小区楼层楼号很好找,但是代聊,楼下吹风好久,进门身材BBA,嫩妹无疑,两个波峰在跳动, 哇简直是可以的了, 简单聊下,冲洗,可以大蟒蛇,来下69,嫩妹子小穴很干净,然后来了几轮动作下来,释放, 妹子屁股是大,美滋滋。 【狼友大队】:点击入群

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海【学院】作业反馈, [2026/9/12 下午7:44] [ 转发自 上海【学院】作业反馈 ] [🖼 🎖精英作业🎖 💃艺名:欣欣 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/33725 ⛳️位置: #浦东新区 🙍‍♂️学生:kaJ ———————————————— 妹妹人照高度统一,态度很好,年龄也确实是比较小,经验不是很丰富,不过有口和🐍😘的服务。身材比起描述略胖,能接受肉嘟嘟的妹妹的cj。] 🎖精英作业🎖 💃艺名:欣欣 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/33725 ⛳️位置: #浦东新区 🙍‍♂️学生:kaJ ———————————————— 妹妹人照高度统一,态度很好,年龄也确实是比较小,经验不是很丰富,不过有口和🐍😘的服务。身材比起描述略胖,能接受肉嘟嘟的妹妹的cj。 上海【学院】作业反馈, [2026/9/12 下午7:44] [ 转发自 上海【学院】作业反馈 ] [🖼 图片]

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海【喜茶】作业报告 👧艺名: #欣欣 ⛳位置: #浦东 上船大楼 🤖课表: https://t.me/xichalssh/33698 📒小作文: 看到是白虎妹妹,其实还是很期待的。进门开始妹妹的态度非常好,说话也挺温柔,很久没有遇到这样温柔的老师了。进门简单的聊了一会天,老师也愿意倾诉,给的情绪价值也非常高。然后还帮洗了澡之后躺下正式开始。 口活不错,还问我会不会介意齿感,老师的脸没有照片上那么胖,还专门化了妆,长得感觉比照片可爱,身材也会有一点点微微胖但是特别软,并且在口的时候大胸还是会晃晃的,也给到很好的情绪价值点个赞,最后结束给微微的来了一点点的深喉,然后正式开始,可以女上一会儿,下面还会一吸一吸的,感觉很不错,胸特别敏感。 课表上的舔胸,口,再加舌吻等课表上基本都有。 总体来说好评,在这个价位里面很顶了,还会再去。 💁‍反馈人: JO

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

【时间】:2026-09-11 【老师】:欣欣 【留名】:神兜兜打洞洞 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:8.5 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.75 【过程】:约课,公寓遥控上楼,进门一眼人照基本相符20左右170,寒暄几句,态度好,帮洗,妹子微胖正常黄皮有点肚子,大屁股,较BBW来说胸不算大,上床简单服务舌吻,舔胸,口的蛮认真的,给调教了会儿口技,舒服多了😆造福后面狼友😄戴套开干,妹纸敏感型,舔了两下乳头就硬挺起来了,挑逗小豆豆痒的求饶,先后入大屁股臀浪视觉冲击力强,大力桩了一会儿,还是比较耐桩的,换正入,阴毛稀疏,屌感紧度一般,反馈真实,深入到底有收缩感,桩了一会儿,加速出货,总体满意,妹纸也蛮会聊天的. 【狼友大队】:点击入群

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海泡泡屋修车报告模版:https://t.me/shpaopaowujlq 【妹子艺名】:欣欣 【联系方式】:@xinxin1_12 【所在位置】:浦东 【上课水费】:300p工兵 【验证留名】:出击侠 【验证时间】:9.8 【体验评价】:8.5 【人照几成】:8.5 【身材描述】:BBW 【老师类型】: 嫩妹 【服务过程描述】:老小区,遥控进门,比较安全,进门好评,确实嫩妹 18 19岁的样子,聊了一下确实没到20,口活可以,无齿感,人工白虎。后入满分,肥臀非常哇塞,臀浪一波又一波,值得推荐。 【温馨提醒】:报告仅供参考,请理性选择,切勿对号入座 注:提交报告需要约课记录

18 Oct 2026, 12:57 UTC1 viewsread 18 October 2026
Forwarded from @shhxinxinpd

上海【喜茶】作业报告 👧艺名: #欣欣 ⛳位置: #浦东 上船大楼 🤖课表: https://t.me/xichalssh/30693 📒小作文: 今天空下来寻得欣欣老师。开门便是小甜妹一个。进门先洗澡,随后便进入老师的闺房。上床老师三点口后直接带套开干,第一发后入起手,老师的腰臀比也相当不错,扶着老师的大屁股开始猛干。过程中呻吟不断,从后方观赏着老师的腰臀和美腿让我性欲暴增。在冲刺下将第一发全部射入老师温暖的蜜穴中。中间老师会很温柔的聊天,女友感十足。第二发前老师做了服务,细致周到。时间稍久老师也没有催促,依旧十分配合。必定二刷! 💁‍反馈人: What

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @shhxinxinpj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“欣欣的评价” (@shhxinxinpj), 1 subscribers as measured 18 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shhxinxinpj.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.