Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shilpa Marga

Channel

Shilpa Marga

@shilpa_marga

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,826subscribers

-45 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001715175781
TypeChannel
Username@shilpa_marga
Created8 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shilpa_marga

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,8264,8724,8496 August 2026 — 4,871 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,872 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,859 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,849 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,848 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,843 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,838 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,828 subscribers31 August 2026 — 4,845 subscribers3 September 2026 — 4,843 subscribers9 September 2026 — 4,839 subscribers12 September 2026 — 4,832 subscribers16 September 2026 — 4,826 subscribers6 August 202616 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 41 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,819–4,879 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 10:214,826-6
12 Sept 2026, 18:014,832-7
9 Sept 2026, 00:194,839-4
3 Sept 2026, 23:164,843-2
31 Aug 2026, 21:564,845+17
28 Aug 2026, 18:184,828-10
25 Aug 2026, 10:524,838-5
22 Aug 2026, 01:464,843-5
19 Aug 2026, 02:244,848-1
16 Aug 2026, 06:254,849-10
9 Aug 2026, 16:214,859-13
6 Aug 2026, 21:454,872+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:034,871first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 10 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

521 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥15930.5%
13926.7%
🙏9117.5%
5610.7%
👍305.76%
🤩234.41%
😱142.69%
🤔91.73%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 521 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
17
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 18 we hold a reading for · 44%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shilpa_marga. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC286 views27 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​Буду понемногу выкладывать информацию по неварскому буддизму. Кое-кто успел вписаться в учебный курс у Праджавала Ваджраачарьи, о котором я предупреждал. Если и когда будет следующий набор - обязательно предупрежу. 🔥☸️Девять Дхарм☸️🔥 Символической репрезентацией Драгоценности Дхармы у неварских буддистов это Navagrantha — «Девять книг» или Navadharma, «Девять дхарм». 1. Aṣṭasāhasrikā Prajñāpāramitā Sūtra «Праджн

🔥118👍4🙏4

8 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC458 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​☠️Капала - продолжение текста☠️ Начало mahāguru sarva namo / vajradākinī sarva namo / Что касается краткого наставления, то следует различать пятнадцать характеристик черепа: количество частей; форма; цвет; толщина; рисунок сосудов; вес; твердость; мягкость; гладкость; собственная область; область богатства; область врага; мужской; женский; отверстия. Если череп целый, то проявятся драгоценности, а также все необ

🔥763🙏2

4 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC716 views34 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

​​​​☠️Откуда берутся божества?☠️ Мой любимый герой мира эзотерики это Бог Кузя. Не, ну серьезно) Чувак с, прямо скажем, отрицательной харизмой, даже не старающийся сделать свое "учение" хоть немного последовательным или правдоподобным. Называет себя вот непосредственно Богом. Типа: "Библию читали? Ну вот, там про меня". Не аватаром, пророком, новым пришествием - нет, никаких компромиссов. И он создает маленькую, но

🔥128👍4🤩43🤔3

1 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC759 views16 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

​​☠️Капала - исследование☠️ Как я уже писал, к выбору капал традиционно относились довольно придирчиво, особенно когда они были широко доступны. Обнаружил замечательную научную работу, перевод которой по частям приведу здесь. Если что - оригинал Thod pa brtag thabs «Руководства по исследованию черепов» Основная цель данного исследования — представить обзор ключевых текстов, принадлежащих к жанру тибетских краниологи

🔥94🙏3

28 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC825 views58 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

​​☸️👹🔥Во вторник, день планеты Марс, вроде уместно немного позлобствовать)) Дхармическая информационная гигиена. Нас окружает плотный поток всевозможной информации по эзотерическим доктринам и, в частности, дхармическим религиям. И если вы не очень в теме (или очень не в теме) разобраться в достоверности сведений практически невозможно. Ситуация с буддизмом в этом смысле, особенно в последние годы, стала получше. По

38🔥107🤔3

27 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC754 views32 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

☸️🔯🔥Друзья!🔥🔯☸️ Как я и предупреждал, начинают актуализироваться всякие учебные дхармические инициативы)) В частности. Знакомый Баджраачарья Пра Джавала Нанда (не путать с Праджавлом Баджраачарьей, живущим в Портленде) собирает небольшую онлайн группу для занятий медитацией в традиции неварского буддизма. Поскольку инициатива совершенно новая, что это из себя будет представлять мне сказать сложно) Ну и потребует опре

10🔥9🙏85

25 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC691 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

☠️Иллюстрация☠️ Металлическая капала - отдельно и на столике практикующих. #kapala Shilpa Marga - Путь художника. Мифология и иконография.

11🔥4🙏2👍1

25 Jul 2026, 12:01 UTC764 views23 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​☠️Капала - практические вопросы☠️ Чтобы немного передохнуть от научных сведений, давайте разберемся, а нужна ли капала современному практику Ваджраяны. И если да - где же ее взять? 1. Модель. В ритуальных тантрических практиках чаще всего используются маленькие металлические "модели" капалы. Используются они для так называемого "внутреннего подношения" - что это такое мы обсудим позже, но если вы это делаете, то

11🔥9🙏2👍1

21 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC848 views32 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💀Немного капалического юмора💀 О непростом труде добывателей капал - читайте в субботу) #kapala Shilpa Marga - Путь художника. Мифология и иконография.

13🔥11🤩61🙏1

18 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,050 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​​☠️Капала - с чего все началось☠️ Согласно легенде, описанной в индуистских пуранах, все началось с конфликта между Шивой и Брахмой. Вот один из наиболее ранних вариантов (согласно Курма-пуране, (вероятно, первые века I тыс. н. э., окончательная редакция — около VIII–IX вв.)): Риши спрашивают Брахму, кто является Высшей Реальностью. Ослепленный гордыней, Брахма объявляет высшим самого себя. Тогда появляется Шива.

🔥1814👍7🙏4🤔1

16 Jul 2026, 08:40 UTC≈1,060 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

💀Немного капалического юмора💀 Дионисий Парижский и Пиат Турнезский хвастают собственными капалами. ("Книга картинок мадам Мари", Франция, XIII c.) «Подгон» от @a_public_notes #kapala Shilpa Marga - Путь художника. Мифология и иконография.

🔥21🤩1210😱4🤔2🙏1

11 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC≈1,230 views35 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🔥☸️🕉🔯🔥Всем привет!🔥☸️🕉🔯🔥 Как и обещал, после небольшой "этнической чистки" блога - возвращаюсь к его ведению. Формат, думаю, немного изменится, но это мы еще посмотрим. Как бы то ни было, мне представляется полезным подробно разгрызть какую-либо тему (возможно - с использованием материалов, которыми любезно поделятся читатели🙏🏻) - так будет проще ориентироваться, и будет больше практической пользы. 💀В связи с этим,

🔥19🙏7👍54

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @shilpa_marga. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,207
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shilpa Marga” (@shilpa_marga), 4,826 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shilpa_marga.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.