Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 39 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,511–5,547 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Sept 2026, 17:57
5,515
-3
5 Sept 2026, 12:38
5,518
-3
1 Sept 2026, 11:18
5,521
+5
29 Aug 2026, 00:43
5,516
-4
26 Aug 2026, 09:33
5,520
-14
23 Aug 2026, 15:56
5,534
-9
19 Aug 2026, 15:46
5,543
+6
16 Aug 2026, 06:35
5,537
+1
12 Aug 2026, 19:13
5,536
-2
10 Aug 2026, 00:29
5,538
+8
7 Aug 2026, 09:32
5,530
+1
6 Aug 2026, 18:48
5,529
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
2,815 reactions across 12 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
955
33.9%
😁
347
12.3%
❤🔥
312
11.1%
🔥
295
10.5%
💯
290
10.3%
😭
187
6.64%
💔
114
4.05%
🤯
77
2.74%
🤩
50
1.78%
👍
41
1.46%
😱
34
1.21%
😍
31
1.10%
👀
26
0.924%
🎉
20
0.71%
🐳
12
0.426%
💋
8
0.284%
🤝
7
0.249%
🕊
5
0.178%
🙈
2
0.071%
🤬
2
0.071%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,815 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
8.33%
1 of 12 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
2,410
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
3,220
over 11 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5yNBeqG
1
20 July 2026
20 July 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 25 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
и тут же поделюсь кусочками впечатлений потому что а че мне сделают эт от меня далеко 🌚
Сделал вид, что я человек широких взглядов и прочитал-таки «Скованных»
надо же было узнать шо все так ссут кипятком
ну и LADNA
Мне понравилось.
Это первое и единственное произведение, которое я читал по драмионе. Я знаю что это чуть ли не самый популярный пейринг в мире, но мне никогда не была понятна природа его популярности. …
Неожиданный писательский совет, необязательный, впрочем, к исполнению, но — весьма полезный на моем опыте.
Пишите сочинения по литературе.
Да-да. Вот прям как в школе. Дочитали книгу — и вперед по откатанному: что хотел сказать автор? Какава мотивация героя? Какая у произведения управляющая идея? Какие литературные и нарративные приемы были использованы.
В школе я писал такие сочинения пачками: за себя и за Сашку,…
А еще отдельно от рекламы злой микроспич про спорт.
Меня очень бесит когда люди говорят про «спортивность», «заниматься спортом» и вот это вот все, потому что спорт — это залупа коня.
Спорт — это разъебанные в сопли колени, порушенная психика, истрепанные тела со сроком годности до сорока лет, а потом пожизненный абонемент к ортопеду. Спорт — это фигуристки с РПП, футболисты, которые не могут наступать за собственны…
Ииии снова ежемесячный повод потрепаться про фитнес под рекламу Fitstars и на этот раз о том, как этот самый фитнес очень опосредованно связан с похудением.
Ассоциация фитнеса и самой идеи контроля веса очень плотно застолбилась в массовом сознании. Худоба всегда подается под соусом «спортивности», а тренировки почти всегда продаются в связке с похудением.
Нюанс в том, что вещи эти связаны очень… не очень. Первая …
всю жизнь считал, что эта надпись на зеркалах машин очень… зловещая
объекты в зеркале ближе, чем кажутся
ну скажите, что это не звучит как лайн из мистического хоррора
Мне тут донесли, что население думает, что закрытый чат МЗЭ это что-то для избранных, а не для кривозубых крестьян и народ стесняется туда стучаться, и я понял, что накрутил какой-то интриги на пустом месте.
Нет там никакой интриги, сплошная паранойя.
Мои книги издаются в цензуре, это ни для кого не новость. Раньше был бусти для оригинала, но бусти индексируется поисковиками а мне вот не упало шоб меня мог найти кто…
Знаете этот мем: низкий голос = красивый голос? Если он низкий, то сразу «бархатистый», «успокаивающий» и внушающий доверие. И неважно, какую дичь человек несет — ты просто киваешь и соглашаешься, таешь как пломбир под июльским солнцем. Низкий голос — авторитетный, низкий голос — желательный. И тут часто начинают ломать копья: а это у нас опять патриархат играет или че за дискриминация происходит?
Ииии — да. Наш моз…
Итак какие же сцены остались от первой фабулы?🌚
❤ спойлеры первого тома
✴️Смерть Кастора, понятное дело. Парень родился, чтобы умереть, СМЕРТЬ ТВИНКА ЭТО КАНОНИЧНОЕ СОБЫТИЕ, СОУ КОЛД АВТОРСКИЙ ПОЧЕРК
✴️Сцена, в которой Орхо уходит, калечит Лучика и сжигает его хату. Этот перелом присутствовал в базе.
✴️Не сцена, потому что это не на виду, но общий концепт того что Талия убивает Праймуса. И кто такая Талия — тоже …
влетаю с абсолютно очаровательным и нахуй никому не нужным фактом
майка-алкоголичка на английском называется wifebeater
ну то есть СУТЬ ЦА МЫ ВЕЗДЕ УЛОВИЛИ
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @shimanskayaaaa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Это нормально @vintovkina_arina · 68,394 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 20 August 2026
Доктор Галеева @doctor_galeeva · 28,614 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шиманская орёт | «Мертвые земли Эдеса»” (@shimanskayaaaa), 5,515 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shimanskayaaaa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.