Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ✨Shiny English🇺🇸

Channel

✨Shiny English🇺🇸

@shiny_eng

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,013subscribers

-124 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001956742714
TypeChannel
Username@shiny_eng
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shiny_eng

Growth

7,0137,1377,0757 August 2026 — 7,137 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,137 subscribers11 August 2026 — 7,123 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,102 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers20 August 2026 — 7,076 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,062 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,046 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,039 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,025 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,013 subscribers7 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 29 days, net -124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,994–7,156 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 22:017,013-12
1 Sept 2026, 22:087,025-14
30 Aug 2026, 08:047,039-7
27 Aug 2026, 03:137,046-16
23 Aug 2026, 16:387,062-14
20 Aug 2026, 09:347,076-7
17 Aug 2026, 18:287,083-19
14 Aug 2026, 14:347,102-21
11 Aug 2026, 05:527,123-14
7 Aug 2026, 19:017,137no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:527,137first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 18 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.99%
avg views ÷ 7,013 subscribers
Avg views / post
210
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held21 (18 July 202617 August 2026)
Views total210
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
820.5%
🔥820.5%
👍717.9%
👌615.4%
🤩615.4%
💯25.13%
🙏25.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC210 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Я приехал в США с полной головой английского — и молчал. Учил как все: учебники, списки слов, диалоги из книжек. Внутри всё это лежало. Но когда впервые пришлось отвечать живому человеку в темпе разговора — достать не смог почти ничего. Знал — и молчал. Заговорил я не от нового учебника. Заговорил, когда стал говорить: криво, простыми словами, каждый день. Через пару недель заметил закономерность. Фразы, которые я

💯2👍1

30 Jul 2026, 17:02 UTC471 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Английский я учил как все — по учебникам. Знал грамматику, времена, читал без словаря. Был уверен, что готов. Заговорил я не после учебников. Заговорил в США, когда язык пришлось катать каждый день — в магазине, на работе, на улице. Первые недели собирал каждую фразу в голове и мучился. Потом однажды поймал себя на том, что отвечаю не задумываясь. Ничего нового я в тот месяц не «выучил». Просто накатал то, что уже з

🤩2👌1

28 Jul 2026, 17:00 UTC409 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026

«Вот подтяну грамматику — и заговорю». Это ловушка, в которой люди сидят годами. Звучит-то ответственно: сначала фундамент, потом стены. Сначала все правила, потом разговор. Логично. Только с языком порядок обратный. Я 15 лет помогаю людям заговорить и вижу одно и то же. Человек знает времена лучше меня, разберёт предложение по членам, сдаст тест на высокий балл. А в кафе проще ткнуть пальцем в меню, чем сказать сл

🔥2👍1

27 Jul 2026, 17:01 UTC382 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ты не выучишь английский до автоматизма. Его можно только натренировать. Звучит странно, но вот в чём разница. Уроки дают знание: правила, слова, времена. А автоматизм — это когда слово приходит само, пока ты занят мыслью, а не грамматикой. Знание учат. Автоматизм — накатывают. Поэтому можно пройти пятьдесят уроков «до автоматизма» и всё равно зависать в разговоре. Ты копил объяснения, а речь на скорости требует др

👍2

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC329 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

10/10 · Что бы тебе помогло больше всего прямо сейчас?

  1. Безопасная среда для практики29%
  2. Конкретные техники говорения29%
  3. Разбор своих ошибок без осуждения7%
  4. Просто начать и не бросить36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👌2

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC289 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

9/10 · Где тебе чаще всего нужен разговорный английский?

  1. Работа / карьера18%
  2. Переезд / жизнь за границей18%
  3. Путешествия25%
  4. Общение, контент, интерес25%
  5. Пока не нужен, но хочу быть готов(а)14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC242 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

8/10 · Ты проходил(а) курсы / учил(а) английский в школе или вузе?

  1. Да, и не раз61%
  2. Да, что-то было21%
  3. Нет, сам(а)18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC238 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

7/10 · Как думаешь, чего тебе не хватает, чтобы заговорить?

  1. Словарного запаса23%
  2. Грамматики3%
  3. Практики разговора47%
  4. Уверенности / смелости20%
  5. Не знаю7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC222 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

6/10 · Бывало, что проще показать пальцем / промолчать, чем сказать словами?

  1. Да, регулярно46%
  2. Пару раз было38%
  3. Нет15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC201 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

5/10 · Что пугает больше всего, когда надо заговорить? (можно несколько)

  1. Сказать с ошибкой44%
  2. Что не поймут из-за акцента11%
  3. Что не найду слов вовремя78%
  4. Что буду выглядеть глупо33%
  5. Не пугает ничего11%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC178 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

4/10 · Ловишь себя на том, что репетируешь фразу в голове, прежде чем сказать вслух?

  1. Постоянно38%
  2. Часто33%
  3. Иногда21%
  4. Почти нет8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTC180 viewsread 20 August 2026
Poll

3/10 · Сколько лет ты в сумме учишь английский?

  1. Меньше года12%
  2. 1–3 года35%
  3. 4–7 лет12%
  4. Больше 7 лет42%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @shiny_eng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

10/10 · Что бы тебе помогло больше всего прямо сейчас?

  1. Безопасная среда для практики29%
  2. Конкретные техники говорения29%
  3. Разбор своих ошибок без осуждения7%
  4. Просто начать и не бросить36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

9/10 · Где тебе чаще всего нужен разговорный английский?

  1. Работа / карьера18%
  2. Переезд / жизнь за границей18%
  3. Путешествия25%
  4. Общение, контент, интерес25%
  5. Пока не нужен, но хочу быть готов(а)14%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll28 voters

8/10 · Ты проходил(а) курсы / учил(а) английский в школе или вузе?

  1. Да, и не раз61%
  2. Да, что-то было21%
  3. Нет, сам(а)18%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

7/10 · Как думаешь, чего тебе не хватает, чтобы заговорить?

  1. Словарного запаса23%
  2. Грамматики3%
  3. Практики разговора47%
  4. Уверенности / смелости20%
  5. Не знаю7%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

6/10 · Бывало, что проще показать пальцем / промолчать, чем сказать словами?

  1. Да, регулярно46%
  2. Пару раз было38%
  3. Нет15%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Jul 2026, 17:03 UTCAnonymous Poll18 voters

5/10 · Что пугает больше всего, когда надо заговорить? (можно несколько)

  1. Сказать с ошибкой44%
  2. Что не поймут из-за акцента11%
  3. Что не найду слов вовремя78%
  4. Что буду выглядеть глупо33%
  5. Не пугает ничего11%

The shares total 177%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Easy English 😎
@english_easyly · 82,710
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 August 2026
State English
@state_english · 242,240
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
Викторины на Английском
@spaceofeng · 125,136
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 13 August 2026
АНГЛИЙСКИЙ ПО СЕРИАЛАМ
@seriesenglishhh · 97,919
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 16 August 2026
Real English. Таня Маркова
@bk_gko · 44,835
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 27 August 2026
English Academy🎓 | Академия Английского языка
@english_academys · 29,633
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 8 September 2026
VeryEnglish ☕️ | Очень по-английски
@veryenglink · 57,368
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 23 August 2026
Лиза Конева 🇬🇧| Pop-English
@popenglishLK · 30,738
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 6 September 2026
Английский на слух
@EnglishByEar · 41,974
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 29 August 2026
Английский с нуля
@anglyski_yazik_plus · 30,412
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Английский в картинках
@anglysky_yazyki · 58,232
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026
ENGLISH IN USE
@engl_use · 61,477
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“✨Shiny English🇺🇸” (@shiny_eng), 7,013 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shiny_eng.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.