🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 волшебный артик от @Qirjee 🐩 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 5359754289281511558246custom 5235553649081484077167custom 507347266864100282876custom 523598272060932298723custom 533240647157130480315
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡

Channel
@shizonyashka
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,559subscribers
-273 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001943263381 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shizonyashka |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 62 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shizonyashka |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 40% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 16,559 | -14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 20:11 | 16,573 | -3 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 21:57 | 16,576 | -10 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 22:51 | 16,586 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:21 | 16,590 | -2 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:46 | 16,592 | -8 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 15:40 | 16,600 | -1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:31 | 16,601 | -6 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 16,607 | -21 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 15:56 | 16,628 | -3 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 12:56 | 16,631 | -1 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 14:57 | 16,632 | -6 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 15:58 | 16,638 | -9 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 18:25 | 16,647 | -9 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 21:56 | 16,656 | +1 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 16,655 | +6 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:37 | 16,649 | -10 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 23:56 | 16,659 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 20:51 | 16,651 | -2 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:45 | 16,653 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 23 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 69 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (23 December 2025 – 7 November 2026) |
| Views total | 1,320 |
| Reactions total | 527 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Nov 2026, 16:40 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
57,184 reactions across 16 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5303397579554321580 | 9,299 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5253495724636652541 | 7,748 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5233449329854791683 | 5,560 | 9.72% | |
| custom 5238170770223435654 | 5,112 | 8.94% | |
| custom 5359358516635119886 | 3,628 | 6.34% | |
| custom 5424762609331087026 | 3,315 | 5.80% | |
| custom 5195228488902140564 | 2,963 | 5.18% | |
| custom 5361611171147292733 | 2,854 | 4.99% | |
| custom 5219838041622873944 | 2,553 | 4.46% | |
| custom 5210822574556088598 | 2,503 | 4.38% | |
| custom 5332664075119787821 | 2,254 | 3.94% | |
| custom 5235553649081484077 | 2,007 | 3.51% | |
| custom 5283228675125294277 | 1,929 | 3.37% | |
| custom 5240136825862916045 | 1,835 | 3.21% | |
| custom 5359754289281511558 | 1,147 | 2.01% | |
| custom 5463403004164069695 | 722 | 1.26% | |
| custom 5332406471571304803 | 604 | 1.06% | |
| custom 5204290375975471571 | 554 | 0.969% | |
| custom 5073472668641002828 | 468 | 0.818% | |
| custom 5235982720609322987 | 129 | 0.226% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57,184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 December 2025 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 волшебный артик от @Qirjee 🐩 🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀
custom 5359754289281511558246custom 5235553649081484077167custom 507347266864100282876custom 523598272060932298723custom 533240647157130480315
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡
у меня плохое зрение, но мой третий глаз видит даже без очков… 🎀
custom 52355536490814840771,840custom 5332406471571304803589custom 5073472668641002828392custom 5359754289281511558181custom 5235982720609322987106
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡
🎀🦴шизоняшка (U^ェ^U)🦴🎀 pinned «ПРОДАЮ СИГНЫ! ЦЕНА 400 РУБЛЕЙ 🩷 ПИШИТЕ МОЕЙ АДМИНКЕ @lolilol1»
мне так нравится это моё селфи, у меня давно небыло таких крутых фотографий
custom 5204290375975471571215custom 5240136825862916045108custom 536161117114729273350custom 521983804162287394427custom 521082257455608859810
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡
🤩 🌟🤩🤩 тропическая принцесса в сочи 🤩🌟
custom 52198380416228739441,890custom 5240136825862916045894custom 5361611171147292733471custom 5210822574556088598171custom 5204290375975471571122
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡
он висел здесь так долго, будто ждал именно меня🤩
custom 52108225745560885981,700custom 5361611171147292733713custom 5240136825862916045562custom 5219838041622873944164custom 5204290375975471571114
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺𝜗𝜚.༚♡
меня пугает, как легко мы начинаем видеть в людях не личность, а карикатуру из одного поступка меня ужасно расстраивает, когда человека начинают массово травить из-за одной мелкой оплошности или же просто додуманной клеветы, если он кажется слишком странным и не вписывается в стандарты, как это было со мной люди перестают видеть сложную многогранную личность, они делят весь мир на черно-белое мышление, навешивая яр…
custom 53616111711472927331,620custom 5210822574556088598622custom 5219838041622873944472custom 5240136825862916045271custom 5204290375975471571103
Signed ♡༚.𐂯⁺˳𝒮𝒽𝓊𝓇𝒶˳⁺✧.༚♡
🍀🤩чудесный артик от @isherashome ☆〜(๑❛ᴗ❛๑)💕
custom 53593585166351198861,500custom 5283228675125294277641custom 5332664075119787821427custom 5238170770223435654154custom 5359754289281511558104
Signed ♡ шура ♡
🎀✨да, я - куколка, но никогда не буду послушно стоять на чьей-то полочке🎵🌹
custom 53593585166351198861,930custom 5238170770223435654888custom 5332664075119787821537custom 5359754289281511558232custom 5283228675125294277115
Signed ♡ шура ♡
🌈 безумно милый артик от @shuryonaVsandalyah 🎀
custom 52381707702234356541,680custom 5283228675125294277652custom 5332664075119787821436custom 5359754289281511558152custom 535935851663511988686
Signed ♡ шура ♡
✨🍬✨🍦✨🎀✨🍦✨🍬✨ сегодня я сладкая, завтра - солёная, но всегда настоящая! (๑>◡<๑) ✨🍬✨🍦✨🎀✨🍦✨🍬✨
custom 52381707702234356542,390custom 5332664075119787821854custom 5283228675125294277521custom 5359754289281511558232custom 5359358516635119886112
Signed ♡ шура ♡
дикая дива… 🌸❤️
custom 52534957246366525413,040custom 5233449329854791683956custom 5195228488902140564723custom 5303397579554321580353custom 5463403004164069695137
Signed ♡ шура ♡
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @shizonyashka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 4 posts on @shizonyashka as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🎀🦴шизоняшка (U^ェ^U)🦴🎀” (@shizonyashka), 16,559 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shizonyashka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.