Channel
@shopirlar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
993,307subscribers
-8,757 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001388676547 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shopirlar |
| Created | 27 September 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 49 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shopirlar |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:38 | 993,307 | -3,105 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 19:16 | 996,412 | -3,120 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:56 | 999,532 | -3,386 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 1,002,918 | -4,284 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 07:46 | 1,007,202 | -3,987 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 04:58 | 1,011,189 | -2,820 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 05:47 | 1,014,009 | -3,360 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 06:26 | 1,017,369 | -3,210 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 06:35 | 1,020,579 | -3,684 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 05:30 | 1,024,263 | -3,841 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 1,028,104 | -4,833 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 01:50 | 1,032,937 | -11,825 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 07:18 | 1,044,762 | -29,775 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 23:38 | 1,074,537 | +85,195 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 00:18 | 989,342 | -20,272 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 11:01 | 1,009,614 | +2,103 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:20 | 1,007,511 | +3,132 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 11:21 | 1,004,379 | +2,309 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 1,002,070 | +6,549 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 23:19 | 995,521 | first reading |
2,551 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 167 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1,001 of 1,002 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,551 (5 August 2026 – 25 October 2026) |
| Views total | 67,887,315 |
| Reactions total | 222,533 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 25 Oct 2026, 16:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 645 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 338 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 297 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.0 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 36.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 77.7% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 86,300 views — 8.35% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 105,000).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /12441614 Oct 2026, 12:01 UTC | 27 minutes – 29 minutes old | 18,700 views ~426 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 12 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12441514 Oct 2026, 11:30 UTC | 325 minutes – 60 minutes old | 31,100 views ~58 reactions | 60 minutes: 31,100 | not yet at 24h | 25 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12441414 Oct 2026, 10:42 UTC | 438 minutes – 1.8 hours old | 48,000 views ~553 reactions | 60 minutes: 36,313 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 38 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12441314 Oct 2026, 10:41 UTC | 439 minutes – 1.8 hours old | 41,300 views ~93 reactions | 60 minutes: 31,303 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 39 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12441114 Oct 2026, 10:41 UTC | 439 minutes – 1.8 hours old | 34,600 views ~45 reactions | 60 minutes: 26,167 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 39 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12441014 Oct 2026, 10:15 UTC | 510 minutes – 2.3 hours old | 43,200 views ~52 reactions | 60 minutes: 28,602 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 43 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12440914 Oct 2026, 09:25 UTC | 6under a minute – 3.1 hours old | 53,200 views ~192 reactions | 60 minutes: 29,900 → 3.0 hours: 53,200still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /12440814 Oct 2026, 09:19 UTC | 66 minutes – 3.2 hours old | 54,300 views ~103 reactions | 60 minutes: 30,136 interp. → 3.0 hours: 53,181 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
222,153 reactions across 999 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 75,986 | 34.2% | |
| ❤ | 51,451 | 23.2% | |
| 😁 | 38,972 | 17.5% | |
| 🤬 | 34,826 | 15.7% | |
| 😢 | 11,407 | 5.13% | |
| 👏 | 9,511 | 4.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 999 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222,153 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 25 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @shopirlar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 26 September 2026 to 25 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Бугун дунё футболи иккига бўлинадиган кун, эл-классико хозирча умумий хисоб тенг хар икки жамоа 106 мартадан бир-бирини ютишган, Реалда 3 та гол кўп! Бугун ким ғалаба қозонса олдинга ўтиб кетади! Бугун тунда 01:00 да ўйин бошланади! Яқинларга юбориб қўямиз Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
❤12😁3👍2🤬2
100 долларликдаги одам Бенжамин Франклик ҳақида сиз билмаган маълумотлар, бу одам президент бўлмаган! Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
❤53👍25😁4👏2🤬1
#ДИҚҚАТ ‼️ТОШКЕНТНИНГ 6 ТА ТУМАНИДА СУВ ЎЧИРИЛАДИ! Эртага сув захирасини тайёрлаб қўйинг! 26 октябрь соат 09:00 дан 27 октябрь соат 14:00 гача таъмирлаш ишлари сабабли Тошкентнинг қуйидаги туманларида ичимлик суви вақтинча ўчирилади: 📍 Мирзо Улуғбек 📍 Яшнобод 📍 Бектемир 📍 Сергели 📍 Миробод 📍 Янгиҳаёт Шунингдек, ушбу туманларда иссиқ сув ҳам ўчирилиши мумкин. 🚚 Аҳолига ичимлик суви бепул равишда уйигача етказиб берил…
🤬31❤22😁10👍2👏1😢1
#ДИҚҚАТ ‼️Уй сизнинг, коммунал тўлов қилмоқчисиз, лекин иловада бошқа одамнинг исми чиқяптими? Буни тўғрилаш осон. Видеони кўриб, ўрганиб олинг! Яқинларга ҳам юбориб қўямиз, фойдали бўлади! Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
❤25👍6😁2
Буғдойга тонналаб қум аралаштириб сотишяпти экан😱 Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
🤬298😢22❤15😁10
🇳🇴 НОРВЕГИЯ | 🇩🇰 ДАНИЯ | 🇩🇪 ГЕРМАНИЯ 🇳🇴 НОРВЕГИЯДА ИШ 💶 Маош: 3200€ – 4500€ 🔨 Ишлар: 🏗 Қурилиш 📑 Қадоқлаш 🚛 Ҳайдовчилик 🐟 Балиқчилик 🇩🇪 ГЕРМАНИЯДА ИШ 💶 Маош: 3000€ гача 🔨 Ишлар: 🏗 Қурилиш 🌾 Қишлоқ хўжалиги 🚛 Ҳайдовчилик 📦 Омбор ишчиси 🇩🇰 ДАНИЯДА ИШ 💶 Маош: 3000€ – 4000€ 🔨 Ишлар: 🏗 Қурилиш 📑 Қадоқлаш 🚛 Ҳайдовчилик 🐄 Чорвачилик 💳 Фирма тўловлари: 💵 Бош тўлов: 8 500 000 сўм ✈️ Авиа чипта 🛡 Суғурта 📑 Консалтинг хизма…
❤32🤬7😁1
#ДИҚҚАТ ‼️Кечаси ишлаганлик учун 1,5 баробар кўп ҳақ тўланиши кераклигини билармидингиз? Видеони барча ҳамкасбларга ва ишхона гуруҳларига юбориб қўйинг! Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
😁45❤39👍12🤬4
#ДАҲШАТ ⚡️ЖАНУБИЙ КОРЕЯДА ЎЗБЕКИСТОНЛИК ЭРКАК ТАКСИ ҲАЙДОВЧИСИНИ КАЛТАКЛАШДА ГУМОНЛАНМОҚДА😨 Жанубий Кореянинг Хвасон шаҳрида ноқонуний такси хизмати кўрсатмоқчи бўлган Ўзбекистон фуқароси ўз қоидабузарлигини видеога олмоқчи бўлган маҳаллий ҳайдовчини калтаклашда гумонланмоқда. Ҳужум оқибатида 50 ёшли Корея фуқароси ҳушини йўқотган. Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
🤬137❤54👍28😁6👏2
#Диққат #Огоҳлик Бизнес-блогер Жахонгир Латипов инфаркт хавфи билан реанимацияга тушиб қолибди Яқинларга юбориб огоҳлантириб қўямиз, хали ёшману деб бефарқ бўлманг Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
😢105👍51❤42🤬2😁2
Бурундаги тукларни юлиш қанчалик хавфли эканини биласизми? 😳 Бу оддий кўринган одат жиддий асоратларга олиб келиши мумкин. Видеони охиригача кўринг ва яқинларингизга ҳам юбориб, огоҳлантириб қўйинг! Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
❤35👍20😁13😢6
#Диққат ⛔️Ўзгариш тарафда автобус полоса учун ремонт бошланибди, бу томонда энди пробка бўлиши мумкин, иложи бўлса бошқа йўллардан юринг! ❌ Яқинларга хам юборинг огоҳ бўлишсин! Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
🤬48❤26👍7😁4
#Диққат ⚡️Машина панелидаги белгилар нимани англатади барчасини билиб олинг! Янги шопирларга хам юборинг Катталар канали 👉 @SHOPIRLAR га обуна бўлинг, зўрлари бизда
👍51❤25🤬5😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,551 posts we hold for @shopirlar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@shopirlar edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 55 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@shopirlar named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
14 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shopirlar 🚗🚔| Tezkor xabarlar” (@shopirlar), 993,307 subscribers as measured 25 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shopirlar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.