Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Shraibman

Channel

Shraibman

@shraibman

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

11,586subscribers

-193 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001137503527
TypeChannel
Username@shraibman
Created26 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shraibman

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

11,58611,77911,682.55 August 2026 — 11,779 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,779 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,774 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,766 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,757 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,752 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,750 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,746 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,743 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,739 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,730 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,729 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,722 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,718 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,713 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,712 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,708 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,706 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,703 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,700 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,696 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,695 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,689 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,690 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,659 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,645 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,640 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,634 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,630 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,620 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,612 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,586 subscribers5 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net -193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,557–11,808 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 11:2011,586-26
17 Sept 2026, 01:1911,612-8
15 Sept 2026, 01:0211,620-10
13 Sept 2026, 11:5711,630-4
11 Sept 2026, 16:1911,634-6
9 Sept 2026, 03:2111,640-5
5 Sept 2026, 21:3911,645-14
3 Sept 2026, 18:3611,659-31
2 Sept 2026, 12:0711,690+1
1 Sept 2026, 10:0611,689-6
31 Aug 2026, 07:5311,695-1
30 Aug 2026, 05:5511,696-4
29 Aug 2026, 05:3411,700-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:0211,703-3
27 Aug 2026, 04:3911,706-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:1311,708-4
25 Aug 2026, 04:1911,712-1
23 Aug 2026, 22:0411,713-5
22 Aug 2026, 04:3611,718-4
19 Aug 2026, 21:5411,722first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 27 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.4%
avg views ÷ 11,586 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,180
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held21 (27 January 20252 September 2026)
Views total3,180
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 00:36 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 18:49 UTC≈3,180 viewsread 3 September 2026

Для тех, кто не любит видео, вот расшифровка моего последнего для Карнеги. https://storage.googleapis.com/crng/belarus-lukashenko-russia-visit.html

30 Jun 2026, 14:41 UTC≈11,100 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Почему Лукашенко выполнил ультиматум Киева? Нарастающее противостояние Украины и Беларуси вышло на новый уровень, когда Киев выдвигает Минску ультиматумы, а тот без лишнего шума их выполняет. 18 июня Владимир Зеленский потребовал, чтобы белорусские власти в течение недели отключили ретрансляторы на вышках мобильной связи вдоль украинской границы, которые помогали навигации российских дронов, или Киев сделает это сам

30 May 2026, 15:43 UTC≈13,700 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Что стоит за заявлениями о возвращении Беларуси в войну В мае на фоне застоя в российском наступлении неожиданно активизировались разговоры о том, что в войну с Украиной может вступить Беларусь. О таких планах Москвы несколько раз заявил Зеленский и другие украинские военачальники, а Макрон впервые с февраля 2022 года позвонил Лукашенко, чтобы предупредить о рисках эскалации. В самой Беларуси прошли совместные с Рос

28 Apr 2026, 09:30 UTC≈15,100 viewsread 3 September 2026

Последнее видео на Карнеги и расшифровка большей его части для староверов, которые любят читать https://t.me/carnegiepolitika/898

22 Apr 2026, 16:31 UTC≈17,400 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Почему Беларусь не следует за Россией по пути интернет-запретов Шутка Славы Комиссаренко о сериале, где белорусы давно посмотрели сезон, который сейчас смотрят россияне, стала общим местом. Но война Кремля с интернетом последних месяцев рискует сломать эту логику. Внезапно Беларусь превратилась для россиян в оазис свободного интернета: в сети всерьез обсуждают плюсы и минусы переезда в Минск. Разная философия закр

25 Mar 2026, 17:07 UTC≈15,800 viewsread 3 September 2026

А тут текстовая версия последнего эфира на Карнеги https://t.me/carnegiepolitika/867

24 Mar 2026, 09:00 UTC≈13,700 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Почему у США получается разговор с Лукашенко? США снова смягчают санкции против Беларуси, на этот раз — против двух госбанков, Минфина и компаний калийного сектора. Взамен Минск освободил еще 250 политзаключенных, впервые позволив большинству из них остаться в стране. Мало того, перед Александром Лукашенко замаячила еще более заманчивая перспектива — отмена большинства американских санкций и визит в США для личной

3 Feb 2026, 10:45 UTC≈16,500 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Что стоит за поворотом Украины к белорусской оппозиции? Украина неожиданно активизировала политику на белорусском направлении не через диалог с официальным Минском, а через сближение с его противниками в изгнании. До сих пор Киев стремился без необходимости не провоцировать Лукашенко, чтобы тот не стал активнее помогать России в войне. Но теперь от прежней сдержанности отказались в пользу поддержки белорусской оппо

17 Dec 2025, 11:07 UTC≈20,000 viewsread 3 September 2026

Пару моих копеек для Карнеги в разговор о самом главном сегодня «Дипломатический блицкриг Минска на американском направлении выглядит креативным и непомерно амбициозным. Но если присмотреться, Лукашенко использует в отношениях с Трампом тот же подход, который давно зарекомендовал себя с Путиным. Сначала надо найти чувствительные точки в эго старшего партнера, а затем активно их массировать — лестью, демонстративной

13 Sept 2025, 05:50 UTC≈24,600 viewsread 3 September 2026

Мы в действительно интересном, если не сказать шизофреническом моменте в отношениях Беларуси с Западом. Только за один день, 10 сентября, западную границу Беларуси в одну сторону пересекли российские дроны, а в другую — делегация США с новостями о снятии с Минска авиационных санкций в обмен на освобождение новой партии политзаключенных. В новом тексте на Карнеги делюсь мыслями по обоим сюжетам и о том, как они могут

19 Aug 2025, 14:26 UTC≈22,900 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @carnegiepolitikaPhoto

Что даст Лукашенко внимание Трампа? По пути на Аляску Трамп позвонил Лукашенко. Этот созвон вошел в историю внешней политики Беларуси — впервые за 31 год у власти Лукашенко говорил с президентом США. Разговор с Трампом стал прорывом пятилетней изоляции Минска, пусть пока лишь в части западного мира. Месяцы осторожных контактов с Вашингтоном, дозированных уступок, нужных посылов Лукашенко в разговорах с американским

4 Jul 2025, 08:44 UTC≈26,400 viewsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @sovbelarussiaPhoto

🇺🇸Дональд Трамп: "Я разочарован Путиным. Потому что, честно говоря, я не вижу, чтобы он хотел остановиться. И это очень плохо. Действительно. Мне придётся дать ему ещё две недели, чтобы он подумал над своим поведением, иначе моё терпение лопнет и тогда я обрушу на него ещё две недели сокрушительного ожидания!"

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @shraibman. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q104523426 on Wikidata, read 20 September 2026
LabelArtyom Shraibman
DescriptionBelarusian political scientist, journalist
X / Twitter@a_shraibman

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Шрайбман, Артём Геннадьевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…пояснил, что «добирался окольными тропами»{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/shraibman/313 |title=Артём Шрайбман о своей эмиграции в своём телеграм-канале…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Shraibman” (@shraibman), 11,586 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shraibman.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.