Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 情感树洞+爆料吃瓜

Channel

情感树洞+爆料吃瓜

@shudongbaoliao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,007subscribers

+90 since we began measuring on 24 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003869210465
TypeChannel
Username@shudongbaoliao
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 21 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded24 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shudongbaoliao

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9171,00796224 August 2026 — 917 subscribers24 August 2026 — 920 subscribers31 August 2026 — 956 subscribers10 September 2026 — 991 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,007 subscribers24 August 202619 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 26 days, net +90. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 904–1,021 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:181,007+16
10 Sept 2026, 05:38991+35
31 Aug 2026, 06:26956+36
24 Aug 2026, 18:57920+3
24 Aug 2026, 00:00917first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤24100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jul 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,510 views4 reactionsread 24 August 2026

求助!!鼠鼠为怎么跟人分手头疼,现在骑虎难下!!! 背景:(不感兴趣可跳过,不过很神可以当猎奇小故事看)我从高中入学开始便对一个女生有感觉,想要接近她即使是高一分班后,后面三年的依旧是舔和死缠烂打,也经常在微信被骂和冷暴力。再到高考,可以说就是在意淫她的部分帮助下狗运考到她家同一城市的211(她是上了民办本科)。 大学期间,我经常在跟她去玩,关系好了起来,不过还是经常会吵架被她骂(期间给她花了不少钱,还赞助她几千块买佳能单反和苹果手机,差不多加起来有一万吧,虽然也觉得有点不对) 关系的进展很扯,可以说是性关系转变到情侣关系。有次我不想只爆金币,加上小头控制大头,迫协她去开房,一番拉扯下她最终答应了,那晚我第一次在亲身体会了女生裸体的样子和味道。这会还没发生关系,不过后来发现她的欲望也挺强烈的,有一天在她家里破了处。后面她说脑子一热,答应我作她男朋友。 后面我们经常去做,有时去酒店,有时去她家(她父母上班的时候),在她家的时候顺便…

❤4

8 Jul 2026, 14:33 UTC≈2,590 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026

不知道什么时候开始,看 a 片开始会犯困,然后转向了看色情文字小说。上了 TG 之后发现了淫妻绿母这些相关的内容。发现自己非常喜欢看别人分享的绿母和淫妻的经历,觉得非常刺激和兴奋,奇怪的是我自己并没有这块癖好,也不会往自己身边人身上去想,但是对于别人的绿母和淫妻经历就特别刺激,会把自己代入进去,如果过程中还有强奸轮奸乱伦的内容,会更加兴奋。但是问题也逐渐凸显出来就是,就是阈值越来越高,看多了发现能让我感兴趣硬起来的越来越少了。 五月底开始上了纸飞机想找女人聊骚解闷,找了好多绿帽淫妻之类的裙加,喜欢听女的讲被强奸轮奸的经历然后代入进去,到现在感觉好像也就那么回事,因为很少有人能配合。 加多了淫妻绿帽的群,自己有点蠢蠢欲动,这几天开始尝试偷偷拍老婆的内衣裤照片发给别人看给别人意淫。老婆是良家,很传统。一开始给别人看感觉有点刺激,但是发现好像现在也不会很有什么波动(因为对方草不到),然后逐渐发现自己是个绿帽癖,发给别人是想别人侵犯我老…

❤2

5 Jul 2026, 05:10 UTC≈1,700 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

前几天亲姐喝醉了让我去接她 回来路上一直撩拨我 我也一两个月没做了 一路硬着回来 上电梯的时候有很大的身体接触 硬着弄上床的 稀里糊涂就跟她做了 都刚二十出头 已经好几天没说话了 投稿字数限制 有乱伦经验的哥留言一下 我加你

❤1

30 Jun 2026, 07:21 UTC≈1,910 viewsread 24 August 2026

#匿名 和老婆结婚有六年了,可以说是聚少离多,因为工作的关系每个月也就三五天在一起。 可就这短短的几天,还要照顾家里,兼顾朋友,照看小孩等等,基本上没有二人独处的时间。 最长的时候连续半年都不一定有一次夫妻生活。 虽然双方都很信任对方,可始终是个潜伏的危机。 可能是压抑,可能是一些其他的因素,YQ不绿的现象越来越明显,只要有独处的几分钟就会想要去揉揉胸,拍一拍屁股,甚至拍拍照片,脱她衣服啥的。 我们住在低楼层,浴室窗户打开就是小区花园,以前她不锁门时喜欢进去贱一下。 现在她老锁门,只要她去洗澡我就会去开窗,当然也没谁天天盯着别人家里,但是这种可能的露出还是会感到兴奋。 洗完澡去阳台晾衣服,只要敢抬手,下一秒身上的衣服就会被向上拉起蒙住头,整个人半裸在阳台上。 以前还总是反抗,现在老婆都有点习惯了,只是会打一下然后把衣服穿好。 做爱也不在床上了,理由是不能影响小孩,阵地转移到了阳台,飘窗,厨房,浴室和书房。 以前最多拍拍照然后马上…

29 Jun 2026, 00:50 UTC≈1,630 viewsread 24 August 2026

现在大学女生约炮情况普遍吗?和一个女同学相处了半年多,她给我的感觉是有边界感和高认知,性格比较外向。她自称酒吧通,但应该不是夜店club这些,这种情况约炮的可能性大不大?她谈过恋爱我没有,平时穿的衣服有露腿比较多的,感觉和前任发生过关系。我经常被可能不是处和担心出去约炮这两个问题困扰,情绪低落难受。我是不是占有欲控制欲太强了?我知道母单有处子情结正常,但我真心喜欢对方的话,该怎么应对这种情绪呢?

26 Jun 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,940 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

兄弟们我刚玩这个什么也不懂就知道找个地方很黄,刷到那个乌托邦同城约泡的频道说是88介绍费以为是真的就给了,给了后他说会给我匹配,然后发了张照片给他,之后他也给我匹配了一个女生,我和那个女生在飞机上面聊了聊感觉挺正常的,但是又怕被骗,现在约的是27号去见面,希望义父们帮忙给点意见针对这种事情,包括可能就是仙人跳之类的什么的

❤1

25 Jun 2026, 02:14 UTC≈1,860 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

我有一个埋在心里的故事/那一年我刚上初中差不多16多岁左右有一个女孩是从小学转过来的然后一直上到了初中可能是老天的眷顾从小到大都是分到了同一个班级关系变得越来越暧昧可是谁都没有捅破那张窗户纸我当时给他花了不少的钱然后他也会每天半夜来找我聊天打三四个小时的语音电话有什么事情都向我来倾诉我也会尽力的安慰着他每次把他约出来的时候从来没有拒绝过我再看看如今当年没有表白已经联系不到了

❤1

24 Jun 2026, 14:23 UTC≈1,720 views1 reactionsread 24 August 2026

匿名投个稿 本人今年24岁 211毕业 每个月到手一万左右吧 虽然不多 但是在西安这应该还可以 这辈子没谈过恋爱一直是母单 去年9月被我兄弟软磨硬泡拉下海 开始玩电报pc 到现在已经日了不下20个了 我朋友都劝我找个对象 但我始终都不想迈出这一步 因为我一个月pc也花不了多少钱 每个月还能稳定给我妈转5k给我存着 我害怕真谈恋爱之后钱不够花 最主要的是我已经没有耐心去舔这些女的了 不知道这辈子还能不能谈到恋爱了

❤1

24 Jun 2026, 02:19 UTC≈1,610 viewsread 24 August 2026

这不到一年,在网上约了不少年轻女孩,有点上头,可能图新鲜感吧,各种类型的都有,最近想找些少妇试试了

22 Jun 2026, 13:32 UTC≈1,630 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026

我是一名初三学生,平时的消遣就是看看片,尤其喜欢诱奸类型,我的性启蒙和大部分人一样,都是搜东西时偶然搜到些不干净的,接住我就一发不可收拾了。 本来看看片也没有什么,但看多了就有点实践的心思了,这里插一下我的家庭,家里人经常不在家,妹妹年幼,然后家里非常排斥性教育,所以我和我妹妹都没有过正经性教育,这可能也是这一切发展的推手吧。 事情起因是有一天妹妹回家说有个大哥哥说她体型适合学舞蹈,追问下才知道她是被诱骗着猥亵了。 我没想到这种事情居然真的发生在我的身边,还是我的亲人身上,当时是感觉愤怒的,但随着妹妹的讲述,我却无可救药的有感觉了。 随后我把她拉进厕所,说是帮她确认一下是不是真的有天赋,让她脱裤子看看,后面的事情你们应该猜到了。 事后我感到有些后悔,这简直太不是人了,我不仅没有好好教导她,还教她不要告诉其他人(我也不知道为什么要这样做),甚至借这个机会猥亵了她,可能会有人觉得我精虫上脑编故事,但我可以证明不是假的,因为我拍了些照…

❤2

15 Jun 2026, 03:27 UTC≈1,840 views2 reactionsread 24 August 2026

有一个问题,最近和以前单位的一个护士聊起来,已经亲嘴摸过奶,确认关系了,还帮我打过飞机,她最近去健身房遇到了个皮肤白的小奶狗,有告诉我,然后她闺蜜帮她拿了微信,后面才知道是闺蜜以前小时候邻居玩过的,我这个女生是98的,那个奶狗04年的,她就说太小了不忍心或者啥的意思,他妈的和我聊天还表明对他有喜欢感觉,我当时觉得她开玩笑,谁知道今晚她说出来喝酒和她们闺蜜,我刚和约朋友宵夜,她也牛逼的告诉了我她喝酒的地点,我问她几个人,她说五个,我就问她有男的吧,她说你怎么知道,我说我过去看了,其实还没,她以为开玩笑,我说不给别的男的加你之类微信,后面吃完出于好奇就看到了,在外面窗口,妈的男的搂着她,后面她搂着男的,男的靠着她就是那个健身小奶狗,怎么说我看她背面纹身就知道会玩的,其实我也就想玩玩她的,搞了再说,但是不爽的点就是占有欲吧,凭啥那个男的想吃她比我早,后面女的搭男的到她楼下,聊了一会还听到女的说回家记得告诉我。所以兄弟们,你们怎么看,反…

❤2

10 Jun 2026, 06:29 UTC≈2,150 viewsread 24 August 2026

有没有兄弟吃过达泊西丁的,副作用大吗会不会影响体验和性欲,还是说延时套套会好一点

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shudongbaoliao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“情感树洞+爆料吃瓜” (@shudongbaoliao), 1,007 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shudongbaoliao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.