Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 静安水仙🏠个人自聊

Channel

静安水仙🏠个人自聊

@shuixianbo

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

799subscribers

+26 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003923107759
TypeChannel
Username@shuixianbo
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 19 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/shuixianbo

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

77381579417 August 2026 — 773 subscribers18 August 2026 — 792 subscribers26 August 2026 — 815 subscribers1 September 2026 — 813 subscribers9 September 2026 — 810 subscribers19 September 2026 — 799 subscribers79917 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 767–821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 08:40799-11
9 Sept 2026, 23:17810-3
1 Sept 2026, 12:58813-2
26 Aug 2026, 05:29815+23
18 Aug 2026, 10:57792+19
17 Aug 2026, 11:30773first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 04:06 UTC178 viewsread 17 August 2026

【体验评分】:9 【人照几成】:8 【验证留名】: 【验证时间】:2026-08-17 【妹子艺名】:水仙 【联系方式】:@shuixiandabo 【上课水费】:700 【位置环境】:静安 【罩杯手感】:d 【身材描述】:9 【服务类型】:9 【服务态度】:9 【屌感紧度】:9 【个人总结】:水仙姐姐身材顶级,天然大胸q弹,屁股翘,会所出身,冰火口活暴爽,完全无齿感,女上功力深厚,各种姿势娴熟,性价比拉满

4 Aug 2026, 15:54 UTC834 views1 reactionsread 17 August 2026

💃芳名:水仙(介绍⬅️) ✈️直连:@shuixiandabo ⏰日期:2026-08-04 👔男神:小飛哥 颜值:7 | 身材:8 | 服务:9 |态度:9 —————————————— 体验细节: 💃艺名:水仙 ⛳️位置: #静安区 🙍‍♂️学生:小飛哥 今天刚到上海,看到老师在学校,果断约个p上次看到她还是一个月前了,到了小区地方,是一个高档小区,ls遥控上楼,一进门还是那么温柔,客厅是相当的高档,装饰的很漂亮,交了水费,沙发抱着LS聊会天,聊了差不多10分钟,近了浴室鸳鸯浴,还是那一套诱人的流程,开点音乐,简直就是热血沸腾,AB面yyy,直接女上,声音还是那么销魂,sw还是一如既往的丝滑,奈何自己能力有限,还是扛不住,课表的服务都有,不会偷工减料,临走的时候来了一个热情的拥抱,说了一句路上注意安全,心里还是暖暖的,只要她在我会一直刷,水仙还是值得cj不管颜值还是服务,都值得信赖!价格也是比较实惠。

❤1

21 Jul 2026, 08:09 UTC≈1,420 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

💃艺名:水仙 ✈️资料:https://t.me/shxyls/27219 ⛳️位置: #静安区 🙍‍♂️学生:DandanDandan ———————————————— 已经是二刷了,老师依然敬业,课表上有的都有,性格温柔,身材好,之前老师搬家一直没机会来,今天总算是又约上了老师了,满意非常满意,还会在刷

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @shuixianbo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“静安水仙🏠个人自聊” (@shuixianbo), 799 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shuixianbo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.