رســالـة لـك اخـتــار رقــم وشــوف ❤.

Channel
رزَّة
@shw_51
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,105subscribers
-210 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001574852396 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @shw_51 |
| Description | هواجيس ناعمه |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 24 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/shw_51 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:35 | 7,105 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 19:31 | 7,112 | -7 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 7,119 | -6 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:45 | 7,125 | +13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 7,112 | +26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 21:10 | 7,086 | +1 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 05:37 | 7,085 | -6 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:01 | 7,091 | -2 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:40 | 7,093 | -7 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 02:38 | 7,100 | -38 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 7,138 | -22 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 7,160 | -22 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 7,182 | -39 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 7,221 | -28 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 06:18 | 7,249 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 7,247 | -22 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 7,269 | -26 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:09 | 7,295 | -25 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 7,320 | +6 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 7,314 | first reading |
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 4 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.14%
- avg views ÷ 7,105 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 223
- 9 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 9
- of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 75 (4 March 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,009 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 14:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 423
- Videos
- 10
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 9 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
💰بِـسْـمِ اللَّـهِ الرَّحْـمَــٰنِ الرَّحِـيـمِ 💰 📌الخدمـات الموجـودة بالمتـجـر ⬇️ 💰تفعيـل تلجـرام مميـز ⭐ 💰https://t.me/Busines_02/13 💰بيـع نجـوم تلجـرام 🌟 💰https://t.me/Busines_02/15 💰بيـع تعزيـزات قنـوات 🧡 💰https://t.me/Busines_02/80 💰بيـع مقتنيـات تلجـرام 💰 💰https://t.me/Busines_02/114?single 💰بيـع دعـم قنـوات حقيقـي مڪفول👤 💰https://t.me/Busines_02/17 💰بيـع أرقـام لتفعيـل ڪافة البرامـج 📝 💰https://t.me/Busi…
- أنا بحب أوي العلاقات اللي هي بنلف نلف و ملناش غير بعض مهما زعلنا، بس بنتخانق و عارفين إن لازم حد مننا يحن ويلم الموضوع ❤️❤❤❤❤❤🍒""."
ماذا لو عاد معتذرًا؟! - لو عاد سيراً على رموشِ عينيه حامِلاً قلبهُ على كفَّيه، - لو قرعَ الموتُ طبولهُ عليهِ وَ جاءَ مُحمَّلاً بثقلِ الأرضِ ندماً، - فَ والله: قراءة المزيد:📇:
كروب دردشه للكبار فقط ❤️🔥❤️🔥❤️🔥. ✑ 𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗸 https://t.me/addlist/fGNvEmpzFVE0MDg0
ما معنى كلمة Sad.
وثق حساب التيلجرام بتاعك ببلاش من هنا بسرعة ❤❤❤🔥.
اقلب الموازين من اجلي يا الله وإن استحالت فإنها بأمرك تكون🤍
" من يهمل النعم يجازى بفقدها "
أنا ما اقول بسنينك تهنّى ,, أنا اقول السنين أنت هناها🤍.
إما توّردها مواريد الأبطال ولا استريح وخل المعارك لاهلها ،،
متصل الان ؟ تعال خاص بسرعة‼️❣️.
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @shw_51. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@AnaHyem · 13,5929 postsحَـاير
@l5aia · 13,0329 postsرَهيّف
@lmmm505 · 20,6759 posts/
@ncqp7 · 15,7068 postsَ
@QlliilI · 9,2315 postsمسّهاج .
@yy1418 · 12,5254 postsقافّ .
@llle74 · 15,8912 postsذرىَ .
@Uvii39 · 13,5372 postsᅠ
@BinFahid · 1,5671 postبَـوح
@cili23 · 2,4511 postدانه.
@dniix11 · 1,1481 post%
@iinv5 · 4,9381 post᷂اجّـر .
@Ui_9ll · 9,8641 postالوعّد
@uii718 · 3,5661 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@iinv5 · 4,9382 postsهايـَم
@AnaHyem · 13,5921 postللخدمـات الإلكترونـية 𝔹𝕌𝕊𝕀ℕ𝔼𝕊𝕊 ♡
@Busines_02 · 4081 postبَـوح
@cili23 · 2,4511 postدانه.
@dniix11 · 1,1481 post᷂قمّـاري
@eu2ti · 2,7281 postمُش ممكن!
@l2cvij · 17,0501 post
@l4iix · 4,5031 postحَـاير
@l5aia · 13,0321 post
@lio7y · 2,4171 postرَهيّف
@lmmm505 · 20,6751 post/
@ncqp7 · 15,7061 post𝕏
@oooilili · 9321 postَ
@QlliilI · 9,2311 post⚘
@ua3is · 3,2501 postالوعّد
@uii718 · 3,5661 post
@VIV4P · 3,5641 postمسّهاج .
@yy1418 · 12,5251 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@shw_51 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026 · confirmed gone 5 November 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@na27eim · 24,418
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 14 September 2026
@ltv8l · 28,553
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
@BC_O707 · 22,762
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 18 September 2026
@BC_ah13 · 25,376
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رزَّة” (@shw_51), 7,105 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/shw_51.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.