Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Сибирский

Channel

Сибирский

@sibirskytg

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

82,955subscribers

+2,511 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001141039802
TypeChannel
Username@sibirskytg
DescriptionКанал: youtube.com/sibirsky Нашли контент или идею для видео? @sibirskycontent_bot Скинуть мем и арт в предложку? https://t.me/sibirskymeme Реклама? [email protected] Чат для общения https://t.me/sibirskychatek Реестр: https://clck.ru/3FwxYj
Created10 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sibirskytg

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

59,600 average views per post against 82,955 subscribers — an engagement rate of 71.9%. Across the 8,386 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.05% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.5%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured24 of 24 published in the window (0 exact, 24 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,431,300
Mature posts only71.9% over 24 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers82,955 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,386 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.05% · p50 10.5% · p75 21.0% · p90 35.8%
Position in cohort99.010th percentile · 6.8× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.022% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

80,44482,95581,699.56 August 2026 — 80,444 subscribers6 August 2026 — 80,504 subscribers7 August 2026 — 80,653 subscribers8 August 2026 — 80,718 subscribers9 August 2026 — 80,750 subscribers10 August 2026 — 80,821 subscribers11 August 2026 — 80,856 subscribers12 August 2026 — 80,923 subscribers13 August 2026 — 80,949 subscribers14 August 2026 — 80,980 subscribers16 August 2026 — 81,038 subscribers17 August 2026 — 81,056 subscribers18 August 2026 — 81,106 subscribers19 August 2026 — 81,149 subscribers20 August 2026 — 81,190 subscribers21 August 2026 — 81,246 subscribers23 August 2026 — 81,295 subscribers24 August 2026 — 81,315 subscribers25 August 2026 — 81,343 subscribers27 August 2026 — 81,373 subscribers28 August 2026 — 81,513 subscribers29 August 2026 — 81,556 subscribers30 August 2026 — 81,561 subscribers31 August 2026 — 81,562 subscribers31 August 2026 — 81,570 subscribers2 September 2026 — 81,592 subscribers5 September 2026 — 81,630 subscribers8 September 2026 — 81,614 subscribers11 September 2026 — 82,552 subscribers13 September 2026 — 82,766 subscribers14 September 2026 — 82,837 subscribers16 September 2026 — 82,923 subscribers18 September 2026 — 82,955 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +2,511. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80,067–83,332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:2082,955+32
16 Sept 2026, 09:1982,923+86
14 Sept 2026, 13:1582,837+71
13 Sept 2026, 01:2082,766+214
11 Sept 2026, 05:3682,552+938
8 Sept 2026, 10:5781,614-16
5 Sept 2026, 02:3881,630+38
2 Sept 2026, 00:4481,592+22
31 Aug 2026, 22:2981,570+8
31 Aug 2026, 00:1581,562+1
30 Aug 2026, 02:2381,561+5
29 Aug 2026, 03:5381,556+43
28 Aug 2026, 03:4881,513+140
27 Aug 2026, 01:5481,373+30
25 Aug 2026, 23:0581,343+28
24 Aug 2026, 20:0581,315+20
23 Aug 2026, 08:2381,295+49
21 Aug 2026, 20:1881,246+56
20 Aug 2026, 16:0681,190+41
19 Aug 2026, 15:5481,149first reading

Engagement

66 posts held, back to 10 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 99 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
72.3%
avg views ÷ 82,955 subscribers
Avg views / post
60,000
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 66 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held66 (10 July 202621 September 2026)
Views total1,439,700
Reactions total120,501
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 23:47 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
469
Videos
185
Links
129

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
3m 39s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

322,740 reactions across 66 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💋234,74372.7%
😱69,12621.4%
🥱18,8715.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322,740 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1,226
across the posts below
Posts paid on
53
of 66 we hold a reading for · 80%
Most on one post
493
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sibirskytg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 10 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

21 Sept 2026, 16:35 UTC≈25,900 views4,625 reactions3 Starsread 23 September 2026

Нет, чеснок убрать нельзя даже за 10млн+ Исключительно авторский продукт

😱3,380💋940🥱305

21 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC≈27,900 views4,804 reactions4 Starsread 23 September 2026

Кто голосует за копейки (от 200к и ниже), имейте в виду что пицца на домашнем кетчунезе с чесноком

💋3,680😱763🥱361

21 Sept 2026, 16:21 UTC≈28,300 views2,484 reactions16 Starsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

💋2,060😱282🥱142

21 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC≈28,300 views2,636 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

💋2,180😱297🥱159

21 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC≈31,600 views4,756 reactions11 Starsread 23 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💋4,090😱431🥱235

17 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈53,000 views4,523 reactions2 Starsread 23 September 2026
Video

Чел бреется улиткой Почему я целевая?

💋3,680😱639🥱204

15 Sept 2026, 17:07 UTC≈54,000 views1,803 reactions1 Starread 23 September 2026
Photo

здравствуйте. извините за опоздание, можно войти? собака съела будильник пока я бабушку через дорогу переводил а так я всегда вовремя. вот сейчас, например, самый удачный момент начать готовиться к ЕГЭ/ОГЭ, потому что сами понимаете время летит… как время. получить хорошие баллы и при этом не сойти с ума от стресса помогут преподаватели из онлайн-школы Умскул. подпишись на их бесплатные тг-каналы, там матриалы к э

😱1,240💋402🥱161

13 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC≈55,400 views3,790 reactions9 Starsread 23 September 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

💋3,290😱361🥱139

13 Sept 2026, 13:03 UTC≈56,400 views2,523 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Posted without readable text

💋2,050🥱301😱172

13 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈51,100 views5,708 reactionsread 23 September 2026

А вы заметили как слово зумер в интернет лексике перетекло от обозначения поколения, вроде ген х, миллениалы и тп, к общему обозначению типа "молодежь"? Я ща когда вижу как кого то в инетах называют зумерами, те по факту зачастую являются как миинимум ген альфа уже Но в то же время, я думаю, что просто не сложилось более удобного слова чем зумеры, вот и прижилось так А вообще, на такое обратили бы обратили внимание т

😱4,150💋1,200🥱358

9 Sept 2026, 19:27 UTC≈69,500 views8,426 reactions50 Starsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Истинное число зверя

💋6,910😱1,060🥱456

9 Sept 2026, 14:30 UTC≈70,900 views3,540 reactions6 Starsread 23 September 2026

Началось.

💋3,010😱343🥱187

Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @sibirskytg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

здесь живет броен
@br1anm7ps · 1,089,215
#1
Данила Кашен
@DKNASASAL · 391,493
#2
mzlff
@mazellovvv · 421,504
#3
Олёша
@etoolesha · 29,533
#4
ВПШ
@pravdadirty · 1,368,903
#5
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 98,549
#6
Неприятный канал
@unpleasent · 492,735
#7
sndk
@sndkgram · 357,088
#8
КК
@petrovtel · 525,264
#9
T2x2
@t2xtwitch · 333,968
#10
Милс Кел (Play)
@meels_kel · 326,323
#11
Подвал Стинта
@thestint · 264,709
#12
bebrina ❔
@beebrah · 62,477
#13
Соня Хромова
@khromovasonya · 75,127
#14
персик
@anthonyuly · 233,890
#15
ЮГ 404
@ug_404 · 74,328
#16
дипинс 🤢
@deepinstv · 502,219
#17
СЛАВА КПСС \ АНТИХАЙП
@antihype_kpss · 173,967
#18
Геншин Импакт | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_genshin · 110,463
#19
Логово Внизу
@nebudetgg · 494,419
#20
Genshin Media
@genshinmedia · 158,040
#21
PETROVA
@milanapetrovaqueen · 202,336
#22
Хонкай: Стар Рейл | Бледная
@blednayaleaks_hsr · 66,649
#23
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬
@kanalnekiy · 181,387
#24
Testsapo: Тесты и квизы
@testsapo · 110,553
#25
Поднебесный
@underskystar · 24,274
#26
4ch
@why4ch · 1,045,447
#27
художка
@risovanie_referensy · 66,944
#28
STREAM INSIDE
@streaminside · 264,826
#29
Эвелинушка
@eveliinushka · 79,599
#30
memeladze
@memeladze_tg · 2,698
#31
Amoral
@amoral2288 · 69,068
#32
Снайкс
@sniksefly · 28,387
#33
МЭЙБИ БЭЙБИ
@maybebaby · 172,353
#34
Kuplinov ► Play
@Kuplinov_Telegram · 913,893
#35
Легушенька
@legushenkatg · 10,410
#36
Тесты и точка.
@test_dot · 519,044
#37
Винди31🤝
@windy31room · 541,748
#38
nerds
@nerds · 415,438
#39
Премиум эмодзи | стикеры | Premium Emoji
@TgEmojis · 1,673,928
#40
Екатерина Мизулина
@ekaterina_mizulina · 935,690
#41
Ванильные Сливки | Genshin Impact
@vanileaks · 664,562
#42
Utopia Show
@topapopa · 368,504
#43
дед инсайд блонд
@deadblonde · 155,294
#44
Genshin Impact RU
@genshin_impact_ru_off · 478,239
#45
Honkai: Star Rail RU
@honkaistarrailofficial · 234,304
#46
плм
@polmamki · 107,350
#47
Шота что-то пишет
@annashouta · 48,258
#48
Астапов Павел
@astapov_pavel · 62,373
#49
Лололошка ФУ НОВОСТИ
@LololoshkaUSE · 514,948
#50
Ванильный Хонкай | Honkai: Star Rail
@vanihsr · 247,650
#51
Клуб Романтики — Мои Истории
@official_romanceclub · 737,665
#52
Дима Масленников
@maslennikovliga · 2,142,158
#53
твиттота
@twitt_ota · 332,521
#54
Философия Букера
@fedyabooker · 79,200
#55
Zenless Zone Zero | iNFO
@Zenless_Zone_Zero_Info · 104,516
#56
Genshin Impact [RC]
@GenshinRC · 220,825
#57
Honkai: Star Rail | iNFO
@honkai_star · 115,726
#58
Юлик
@juliusspeak · 111,891
#59
дикие собачьи посиделки
@wildsobaka · 13,796
#60
Фикбук
@ficbook_official · 295,457
#61
Telegram Stickers | Стикеры
@tgsticker · 792,397
#62
Егор Украинец Турбо
@egorafullhd · 41,959
#63
[BadComedian]
@TheBadComedian · 600,761
#64
Clapp Snap!
@KateClappTelegram · 171,826
#65
Пекарня
@pekagame · 1,091,300
#66
Подслушано Бьюти Бомб
@beautybomb · 52,659
#67
Веронисистый блог
@vallletttik · 69,412
#68

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Олёша
@etoolesha · 29,533
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 8 September 2026
НОСТЯ
@danonetnostya · 69,353
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 20 August 2026
James Alone Official Entertainment System
@jamesaloneteam · 38,108
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 31 August 2026
Снайкс
@sniksefly · 28,387
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 9 September 2026
Уголок Акра
@akropub · 21,395
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
в гостях у али бридж
@bridge_ew · 219,031
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 24 August 2026
Боярова
@boyarovayulya · 98,549
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 15 August 2026
Amoral
@amoral2288 · 69,068
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
Берлога BVS
@bvsyt · 73,780
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 August 2026
Вестник Чака
@tele_chuck · 33,662
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 September 2026
Каменный клоун
@pebbliestpebble · 53,206
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 24 August 2026
олежка
@singantoleg · 27,784
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 10 September 2026
МАРМАЖ
@maxmarmazh · 61,561
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 22 August 2026
1hp
@unohp · 203,597
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
Olga Mantro
@olgamantro · 35,440
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 2 September 2026
Егор Украинец Турбо
@egorafullhd · 41,959
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
Съемки Милс Play
@meelskesemla · 37,650
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 46 here — alongside 45 others — read 31 August 2026
VNNV — криминал и новости
@vnnva4 · 44,167
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
TheRudyGames
@therudygroup · 44,299
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 28 August 2026
Ингосстрах
@ingosofficial · 76,912
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 20 August 2026
Мужское Женское. Редакция
@dorogoemj · 21,823
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 22 September 2026
Астапов Павел
@astapov_pavel · 62,373
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 21 August 2026
Капитан Вульф
@happywolf69 · 110,722
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 August 2026
Мирби
@mirby22 · 52,071
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 24 August 2026

This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сибирский” (@sibirskytg), 82,955 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sibirskytg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.