Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for сидишь такой думаешь

Channel

сидишь такой думаешь

@sidiw_dumaew

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,108subscribers

-253 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001589621799
TypeChannel
Username@sidiw_dumaew
Created25 March 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sidiw_dumaew

Growth

8,1088,3618,234.56 August 2026 — 8,361 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,361 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,358 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,338 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,318 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,301 subscribers19 August 2026 — 8,275 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,245 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,224 subscribers28 August 2026 — 8,194 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,171 subscribers4 September 2026 — 8,156 subscribers9 September 2026 — 8,108 subscribers6 August 20269 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 34 days, net -253. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,070–8,399 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 19:398,108-48
4 Sept 2026, 13:018,156-15
1 Sept 2026, 02:338,171-23
28 Aug 2026, 23:238,194-30
25 Aug 2026, 17:038,224-21
22 Aug 2026, 20:048,245-30
19 Aug 2026, 15:418,275-26
16 Aug 2026, 07:358,301-17
13 Aug 2026, 02:338,318-20
10 Aug 2026, 02:178,338-20
7 Aug 2026, 00:038,358-3
6 Aug 2026, 10:188,361no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:448,361first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 25 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

268 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12747.4%
😁6524.3%
🔥2710.1%
💯197.09%
👍124.48%
🙏103.73%
🥰51.87%
🤝31.12%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 268 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2025 to 9 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 May 2025, 06:32 UTC≈2,330 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Всех с ДНЕМ ПОБЕДЫ!🔥

12😁7🙏6🔥3🥰1

8 May 2025, 12:21 UTC≈2,560 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Всегда кажется, что нас любят за то, что мы так хороши. А не догадываемся, что любят нас оттого, что хороши те, кто нас любит. Лев Толстой

18👍6🤝3🥰2

7 May 2025, 07:08 UTC≈2,250 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥104

5 May 2025, 13:23 UTC≈1,820 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Подумай, как трудно изменить себя самого, и ты поймёшь, сколь ничтожны твои возможности изменить других. Вольтер

15🙏4

5 May 2025, 07:21 UTC≈1,810 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Иногда только промахнувшись, понимаешь, как ты попал. Михаил Жванецкий

12😁6💯4

4 May 2025, 13:44 UTC≈1,780 views20 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

14😁6

4 May 2025, 07:41 UTC≈1,620 views15 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥94😁2

2 May 2025, 13:07 UTC≈1,470 views9 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁9

2 May 2025, 07:31 UTC≈1,160 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Чудо, на которое ты рассчитываешь находится в работе, которую ты избегаешь...

💯11

1 May 2025, 12:44 UTC≈1,240 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Не хмурь бровей из-за ударов рока, Упавший духом гибнет раньше срока. Омар Хайям

🔥5

1 May 2025, 06:43 UTC≈1,170 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Из каких же элементов слагается счастье? Только из двух: спокойная душа и здоровое тело. Михаил Булгаков

7

30 Apr 2025, 12:59 UTC≈1,260 views10 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Как жаль, что мы встречаем «не тех» задолго до того, как встречаем «тех». Габриэль Гарсиа Маркес

10

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sidiw_dumaew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

когда нечего ответить
@nechegotvetit · 54,979
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“сидишь такой думаешь” (@sidiw_dumaew), 8,108 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sidiw_dumaew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.