Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Оу щитПосты Сида

Channel

Оу щитПосты Сида

@sidyxart

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

40subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003781263335
TypeChannel
Username@sidyxart
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 12 June 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged3 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sidyxart

Growth

404140.59 August 2026 — 40 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40 subscribers9 August 202630 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 22 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 40–41 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 17:0840-1
16 Aug 2026, 22:2441+1
10 Aug 2026, 18:3240no change
9 Aug 2026, 03:0340first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 12 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

222 reactions across 16 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8739.2%
7533.8%
👍3415.3%
👏104.50%
❤‍🔥31.35%
💘31.35%
🤯31.35%
😁20.901%
🤝20.901%
🥰20.901%
😍10.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 222 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 18:53 UTC34 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Держите контентика на ночь😏

11👍3😁2

1 Aug 2026, 11:18 UTC58 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Было принято волевое решение перерисовать все с нуля, так как первоначальный вариант сильно отошел от того что я задумывал

8🔥2👍1

29 Jul 2026, 09:18 UTC72 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чёт много геев на канале🤔 Ну да ладно, работаем над вторым вариантом. С рукой тут пока проблемы, не обращайте на нее внимания😀

🔥6👍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTC65 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Какой Варик лучше?

  1. 113%
  2. 233%
  3. Цифра между 2 и 427%
  4. 427%
  5. Я гей53%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Jul 2026, 08:58 UTC48 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Это чтоооо? Рисункииии на художественном канале??😱 Кароч, по тихоньку вспоминаю как рисовать. Тут конечно совсем хуйня нарисована, но пока хоть так. Если б я не ебался с фотошопом ЧЕТЫРЕ дня😱, чтобы он заработал, было бы побольше Я снова подсел на доту, поэтому пока буду рисовать по ней😀

🔥62👍1

26 Jul 2026, 11:46 UTC48 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ёхуху, зааносили 4 сезон Коносубы😳. Выйдет в 2027 году😎, ждем всем селом😎 Необычный постер для этого аниме, как будто этот сезон будет не таким веселым. Интересненько 🤔

👍21

22 Jul 2026, 04:57 UTC56 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Ку гайс👋. Кароч, рассказываю)) Контента не было, ибо я собирал себе новый компухтер. Уже больше года хотел это сделать и наконец дошли руки (цены на оперативку это боль😭). Ну и просто дел хватало еще, плюс на работе за двоих ща хуячу и рисовать не могу. В общем, комп уже собран, всё работает😎, так что на днях начну вспоминать как рисовать✒️. Еще в планах снова попробовать стримить🤔, но это по настроению😀 Большое сп

🔥83🤝2👍1

15 Jul 2026, 11:35 UTC66 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

И снова спойлер😋 Скоро уже начну нормально контента наваливать, а то пока времени нет как-то. Фоткал специально так хуёво 😀(блик это цензура! Чтобы вы не узнали персонажа). Кто угадает сколько времени на это ушло, получит «внеочередное заебись!»

🔥8🤯3💘2

9 Jul 2026, 10:44 UTC63 views15 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Контента нет, но есть скетчи😐 Всё рисовалось без рефов😒

🔥103👏2

6 Jul 2026, 11:14 UTC59 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sidyxacasePhoto

Я тут опять ультую🤬 Арт пипец какой сложный😱. Из-за этого я в начале сильно сомневался, получится нарисовать его или нет, и дважды предупреждал заказчика, что может выйти не похоже. Но, видимо, он больше разбирается, че я могу нарисовать, и оставил этот рисунок😀. Ну и вот результат🥰 Аниме: Человек-бензопила - Демон Ангела😇 📱Samsung s25 fe

👍8🔥73❤‍🔥1

2 Jul 2026, 09:14 UTC78 views20 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Пупупу, жара душит🥴 и чет рисование совсем туго идет. Поэтому нате вам хоть спойлер будущего чехла, я тут ультую опять😎

🔥114❤‍🔥2👍2😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sidyxart. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 08:59 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Какой Варик лучше?

  1. 113%
  2. 233%
  3. Цифра между 2 и 427%
  4. 427%
  5. Я гей53%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оу щитПосты Сида” (@sidyxart), 40 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sidyxart.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.