Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SIGNAL⚡️SGX ⭕️

Channel

SIGNAL⚡️SGX ⭕️

@signal_sgx

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

1,418subscribers

+68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003821994292
TypeChannel
Username@signal_sgx
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/signal_sgx

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 17 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,3321,4191,375.56 August 2026 — 1,350 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,350 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,352 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,339 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,335 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,332 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,345 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,347 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,350 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,365 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,419 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,417 subscribers19 September 2026 — 1,418 subscribers1,4186 August 202619 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 44 days, net +68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,319–1,432 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:411,418+1
15 Sept 2026, 02:211,417-2
6 Sept 2026, 15:571,419+54
2 Sept 2026, 14:141,365+15
30 Aug 2026, 21:341,350+3
28 Aug 2026, 03:481,347+2
24 Aug 2026, 18:041,345+13
21 Aug 2026, 01:531,332-3
17 Aug 2026, 20:271,335-4
14 Aug 2026, 17:281,339-13
10 Aug 2026, 22:231,352+2
7 Aug 2026, 17:331,350no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:321,350first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

173 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8046.2%
❤3822.0%
👍169.25%
❤‍🔥158.67%
🎉105.78%
👏74.05%
👌52.89%
🙏10.578%
🥰10.578%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC212 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🎥 Запись AMA Signal & SGX от 5 августа уже на YouTube! Если не успели присоединиться к эфиру — запись уже доступна на нашем канале. В этом выпуске обсудили: 🔹 запуск публичной альфа-версии Prediction в Signal Mini App; 🔹 как работает новый раздел Radar; 🔹 ближайшие этапы развития продукта и roadmap; 🔹 планы по закрытому и публичному тестированию; 🔹 развитие AI-функций и экосистемы Signal; 🔹 ответы команды на вопро…

❤5❤‍🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 10:49 UTC220 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

https://builders.polymarket.com/ Благодарим каждого, за выбор, поддержку и доверия, маленькими шажочками, двигаемся вверх. 88 позиция ✅️⚡️🏆

🔥12❤2❤‍🔥2👍1

5 Aug 2026, 16:51 UTC293 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://us06web.zoom.us/j/6549391296?pwd=VUlvalBWcUtvc3M0aU1IbzJYUUdHUT09

5 Aug 2026, 15:06 UTC281 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🔴 Встречаемся через 2 часа на большой AMA по SIGNAL (20:00 киев/мск) Ссылка появится здесь перед встречей ⚡️

👍3👌1

5 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC302 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📈 Polymarket торгуется за оценку выше $20 млрд Площадка предсказательных рынков ведёт переговоры о раунде примерно на $1 млрд при оценке больше $20 млрд — сообщает Bloomberg. В октябре компанию оценивали в $9 млрд, в апреле — в $15 млрд (тогда $600 млн вложил владелец Нью-Йоркской биржи). За год выручка в годовом выражении перевалила за $1,2 млрд. Соперник Kalshi, по данным рынка, метит и вовсе в $40 млрд. Ставки н…

🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 13:25 UTC283 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026

⚡ ОБНОВЛЕНИЕ SIGNAL Команда проделала большую работу. Мы продолжаем каждый день улучшать приложение, чтобы сделать торговлю быстрее, удобнее и понятнее. Что нового? 🚀 Более быстрые сделки Мы оптимизировали процесс открытия позиций. Теперь ставки отправляются быстрее, а реакция на движение рынка стала ещё оперативнее. ⚡ Повышена стабильность платформы Мы серьёзно оптимизировали внутреннюю архитектуру приложения. Э…

🔥6🎉3👍3❤‍🔥2👏1

5 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC315 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Приложение уходит на обновление и тех работы. Сообщим позднее здесь по результатам

👌4👍2🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC333 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2👍1

4 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC358 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026

🚀 Большая AMA-сессия SIGNAL Друзья, приглашаем вас на большую AMA-сессию, которая состоится завтра в 20:00 (Киев / МСК) За последние недели команда проделала огромную работу, и нам есть чем поделиться. На встрече мы расскажем: • результаты закрытого тестирования и первые цифры; • ключевые достижения проекта за последнее время; • что нас ждёт в ближайшие недели; • как будут работать премиальные функции SIGNAL; • …

🔥9❤2🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 13:33 UTC342 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🧩 Красивый интерфейс не спасает от плохого решения В крипте давно научились делать красивые экраны. График выглядит активно. Кнопка “действовать” на месте. Карточка аккуратная. В чате обсуждение. Кажется, что перед тобой “возможность”. Но внешний слой не отвечает на главные вопросы: ⚠️ что внутри контракта? ⚠️ кто держит основную часть supply? ⚠️ насколько устойчива ликвидность? ⚠️ нет ли искусственного шума вокр…

🔥5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @signal_sgx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 14:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz73 voters

Какие варианты обычно выбирают на рынках предсказаний?

  1. 🔘 Купить или продать38%
  2. 🔘 «Да» или «Нет»59%
  3. 🔘 Быстро или медленно0%
  4. 🔘 Дорого или дёшево3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTCAnonymous Quiz78 voters

Что такое Polymarket?

  1. 🔘 Интернет-магазин5%
  2. 🔘 Рынок прогнозов на реальные события91%
  3. 🔘 Социальная сеть0%
  4. 🔘 Криптокошелёк4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SIGNAL⚡️SGX ⭕️” (@signal_sgx), 1,418 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signal_sgx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.