https://youtube.com/shorts/FEc1d06xjeE?si=jpL3Tu-BJocIuBpB
❤2

Channel
@signalacademy_org
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,321subscribers
-72 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002101873557 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @signalacademy_org |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/signalacademy_org |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 23:18 | 3,321 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:15 | 3,328 | -12 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 02:01 | 3,340 | -2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:25 | 3,342 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 22:08 | 3,347 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 3,353 | -5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 3,358 | -9 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 13:29 | 3,367 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 3,373 | -21 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 3,394 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 23:30 | 3,393 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
114 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 90 | 78.9% | |
| 👍 | 16 | 14.0% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 4.39% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 1.75% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.877% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://youtube.com/shorts/FEc1d06xjeE?si=jpL3Tu-BJocIuBpB
❤2
من دوساله اینستاگرام نرفتم ولی این گاوی که الان داره خبرای جنگ رومیده دوسال پیش سیگنال بده بود وکیف پول چندصدهزار دلاری نشون میداد و ویلای لاکچری وماشین و... حالا 1.2 میلیون فالور این فالورا به نظرتون یکیشون آموزش دیده یابهتره بگیم درست آموزش دیده؟ معلومه که نه همشون طفلیکا فک میکنن این یارو یه چیزی بارشه ومثلا استاده
❤8
دوستانیکه میخوان توی بورس ایران وارز دیجیتال سبد بچینن برای مشاوره وسبدگردانی راه ارتباطی به آیدی خودم پیام بدین @signalacademya
😍5
طرف تهه استادای rtm وict هست تریدره وتحلیگره قدرتمندیه توی اینستا فعالیت میکنه بخدا 2000 فالور داره کسی تحلیلاشو نمیفهمه فالو نمیکنن اونوقت یکی که فقط حرف میزنه هیچی از چارت ونمودار نمیدونه اصلا هیچ تخصصی نداره صرفا چهارتا حرف ازاینور اونور برمیداره میاد برای ملت حرف میزنه خیلی فالور داره میدونین چرا چون اون فردی که تخصص زیادی داره ملت حرفاشو تحلیلاشو متوجه نمیشن شو من که نیست میاد تخصصی تحلیل میکنه وبعضی وقتا حرفا…
❤10👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤6
Seiusdt اگر بخواد طبق این کانال حرکت کنه میتونید درکف کانال ناحیه 0.02 ورود خوبی داشته باشید حداقل سودی که بده 1000 درصد
❤3🤩1
دوسال پیش که پیج من فعال بود من خیلی از ارزها رو تحلیل کردم وگفتم قیمتشون یک دهم یا کمتر میشه نمونه همین FTM که روی 2 الی 3 دلار بود گفتم میرسه به 0.06 وخیلی از ارزهای دیگه اونموقع مثلا اساتید به اصطلاح شاخ اینستا هی سیگنال خرید میدادن یکیشون یه کانال داشت به اسم بیت سول 😂این گاو شانسی شیبا خریده بود پولدارشده بود رفته بود دبی شده بود استاد وآموزش میداد وسیگنال میداد واونموقع کیف پولشو نشون میداد وماشین لاکچری و ویلا…
❤6🤔1
ارزهای دیجیتال اینه بچه ها اگر تحلیل تکنیکال درست بلد باشی بتونی نمودارهای اصلی روپیدا کنی وبلندمدتی تحلیلشون کنی پولت رومیتونی هزاران برابربکنی اگر بلد نباشی پولت یک هزارم میشه 😁
❤5
صحبت من بایکی ازدوستان👆
❤3
مثلا ارز ada یا کاردانو تکنیکال میگه طبق نمودار من باید برگرده نهایت تا 10 سنت بیاد پایین اما اگر این کانالی که کشیدم شکسته بشه این تحلیل ازاعتبار خارج میشه ومجدد باید تحلیل کنیم واحتمالات دیگه رو بررسی کنیم
❤5
iota این ارز رو ببین دور قبل از 6 دلار ریخته تا 0.06 باز رفته بالا تا 2.7 دلار باز الان ریخته تا 0.03 یعنی قیمتش یک هزارم شده😂
❤4
بیتکوین سناریوی اصلاحی دوم خیلی کشیده تر
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @signalacademy_org. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“💎 سیگنال آکادمی” (@signalacademy_org), 3,321 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signalacademy_org.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.