Channel
@silovikbelarus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,223subscribers
-95 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001205965709 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @silovikbelarus |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/silovikbelarus |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 5,223 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 5,234 | -8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 14:41 | 5,242 | -11 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:00 | 5,253 | -8 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 5,261 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 5,264 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 5,272 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 5,275 | -16 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 08:43 | 5,291 | -5 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:03 | 5,296 | -11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:53 | 5,307 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 5,308 | -10 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 5,318 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 5,318 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 11 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 11 December 2025 to 12 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Америка готовится к войне с Венесуэлой США наращивают силы для операции "Южное копьё" в Карибском бассейне, размещая самолёты радиоэлектронной борьбы, боевые спасательные вертолёты, топливозаправщики и истребители F-35 на базах в Пуэрто-Рико и Доминиканской Республике. @belarusian_silovik
🤣1
Трамп, кстати, подтвердил, что Штаты готовы гарантировать безопасность Украине и подписать с ними соглашение. @belarusian_silovik
Дональд «миротворец» Трамп пожаловался, что в Киеве только Зеленскому не нравится мирный план США. @belarusian_silovik
Если у вас спросят о том, что такое Украина последних лет, то вот вам шаблонный пост видео. Украина — это когда стоит бус, вокруг пять-семь ТЦКашника, затягивающие мужика в бус на фоне чьих-то писков и крика самого бусифицированного со словами «помогите» или «отпустите». @belarusian_silovik
Литовские военные вдоль границы с Беларусью разместили батальоны противовоздушной обороны, заявил представитель армейского командования республики полковник Лютаурас Багочюнас. Всех перебросили туда для борьбы с метеозондами контрабандистов. Пока 1:0 в войне Шаров и Литвы. @belarusian_silovik
❤1😁1
Кадры дороги от лбс к Краматорску с украинской стороны. Автор видео показывает натянутые антидроновые сетки и подготовку линии обороны с рвами, зубами дракона. Даже по самым худшим раскладам (украинским), расстояние от лбс до Краматорска составляет менее 14 км. @belarusian_silovik
❤1
Массированная атака российских ударных девонов по Павлограду Днепропетровской области. @belarusian_silovik
Одна из причин сложности сделки между Россией и Украиной — взаимная ненависть Путина и Зеленского, уровень которой огромен — Трамп @belarusian_silovik
Урсула фон дер Ляйен через интервью (?) Politico предупредила Трампа, чтобы тот не вмешивался в дела Европы. @belarusian_silovik
Даже по упоротым украинским картам до Славянска осталось менее 30 км от лбс. Это, конечно, будет тяжелый бой за каждый миллиметр. @belarusian_silovik
Просто оцените частоту проведенных Путиным публичных совещаний с представителями МО. Это говорит о том, что Россия через публичную плоскость душит позиции Киева в переговорах о мире, параллельно оказывая давление и на ЕС, и на позицию Вашингтона. Все в ответ на заявления России сделать ничего не могут, козырей нет, апеллировать не к чему. С другой стороны, на фронте все чаще стали проявлятся случаи "войны в долг", …
Медведев подначивает американцев заявляя, что "наркоман-фюрер показал Белому дому средний палец" Все понимают, что референдум по вопросу территорий на Украине затормозит переговоры. Именно этого и добивается киевский клоун. Сколько еще ты будешь терпеть это, Америка? @belarusian_silovik
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @silovikbelarus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Белорусский силовик🇧🇾” (@silovikbelarus), 5,223 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silovikbelarus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.